From: Nicholas Pratte <npratte@iol.unh.edu>
To: Luca Vizzarro <luca.vizzarro@arm.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu>,
Paul Szczepanek <paul.szczepanek@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/7] dts: revamp Topology model
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:42:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKXZ7ejE83ODLObphUZ6i-n+CW-TmE+hes75t6wM0Q3fV+wAxw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250203151613.2436570-4-luca.vizzarro@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Pratte <npratte@iol.unh.edu>
On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 10:17 AM Luca Vizzarro <luca.vizzarro@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Change the Topology model to add further flexility in its usage as a
> standalone entry point to test suites.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Vizzarro <luca.vizzarro@arm.com>
> ---
> dts/framework/testbed_model/topology.py | 85 +++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/dts/framework/testbed_model/topology.py b/dts/framework/testbed_model/topology.py
> index 814c3f3fe4..cf5c2c28ba 100644
> --- a/dts/framework/testbed_model/topology.py
> +++ b/dts/framework/testbed_model/topology.py
> @@ -9,10 +9,12 @@
> """
>
> from collections.abc import Iterator
> +from dataclasses import dataclass
> from enum import Enum
> from typing import NamedTuple
>
> -from framework.config.node import PortConfig
> +from typing_extensions import Self
> +
> from framework.exception import ConfigurationError
>
> from .port import Port
> @@ -43,35 +45,32 @@ class PortLink(NamedTuple):
> tg_port: Port
>
>
> +@dataclass(frozen=True)
> class Topology:
> """Testbed topology.
>
> The topology contains ports processed into ingress and egress ports.
> - If there are no ports on a node, dummy ports (ports with no actual values) are stored.
> - If there is only one link available, the ports of this link are stored
> + If there are no ports on a node, accesses to :attr:`~Topology.tg_port_egress` and alike will
> + raise an exception. If there is only one link available, the ports of this link are stored
> as both ingress and egress ports.
>
> - The dummy ports shouldn't be used. It's up to :class:`~framework.runner.DTSRunner`
> - to ensure no test case or suite requiring actual links is executed
> - when the topology prohibits it and up to the developers to make sure that test cases
> - not requiring any links don't use any ports. Otherwise, the underlying methods
> - using the ports will fail.
> + It's up to :class:`~framework.test_run.TestRun` to ensure no test case or suite requiring actual
> + links is executed when the topology prohibits it and up to the developers to make sure that test
> + cases not requiring any links don't use any ports. Otherwise, the underlying methods using the
> + ports will fail.
>
> Attributes:
> type: The type of the topology.
> - tg_port_egress: The egress port of the TG node.
> - sut_port_ingress: The ingress port of the SUT node.
> - sut_port_egress: The egress port of the SUT node.
> - tg_port_ingress: The ingress port of the TG node.
> + sut_ports: The SUT ports.
> + tg_ports: The TG ports.
> """
>
> type: TopologyType
> - tg_port_egress: Port
> - sut_port_ingress: Port
> - sut_port_egress: Port
> - tg_port_ingress: Port
> + sut_ports: list[Port]
> + tg_ports: list[Port]
>
> - def __init__(self, port_links: Iterator[PortLink]):
> + @classmethod
> + def from_port_links(cls, port_links: Iterator[PortLink]) -> Self:
> """Create the topology from `port_links`.
>
> Args:
> @@ -80,34 +79,40 @@ def __init__(self, port_links: Iterator[PortLink]):
> Raises:
> ConfigurationError: If an unsupported link topology is supplied.
> """
> - dummy_port = Port(
> - "",
> - PortConfig(
> - name="dummy",
> - pci="0000:00:00.0",
> - os_driver_for_dpdk="",
> - os_driver="",
> - ),
> - )
> -
> - self.type = TopologyType.no_link
> - self.tg_port_egress = dummy_port
> - self.sut_port_ingress = dummy_port
> - self.sut_port_egress = dummy_port
> - self.tg_port_ingress = dummy_port
> + type = TopologyType.no_link
>
> if port_link := next(port_links, None):
> - self.type = TopologyType.one_link
> - self.tg_port_egress = port_link.tg_port
> - self.sut_port_ingress = port_link.sut_port
> - self.sut_port_egress = self.sut_port_ingress
> - self.tg_port_ingress = self.tg_port_egress
> + type = TopologyType.one_link
> + sut_ports = [port_link.sut_port]
> + tg_ports = [port_link.tg_port]
>
> if port_link := next(port_links, None):
> - self.type = TopologyType.two_links
> - self.sut_port_egress = port_link.sut_port
> - self.tg_port_ingress = port_link.tg_port
> + type = TopologyType.two_links
> + sut_ports.append(port_link.sut_port)
> + tg_ports.append(port_link.tg_port)
>
> if next(port_links, None) is not None:
> msg = "More than two links in a topology are not supported."
> raise ConfigurationError(msg)
> +
> + return cls(type, sut_ports, tg_ports)
> +
> + @property
> + def tg_port_egress(self) -> Port:
> + """The egress port of the TG node."""
> + return self.tg_ports[0]
> +
> + @property
> + def sut_port_ingress(self) -> Port:
> + """The ingress port of the SUT node."""
> + return self.sut_ports[0]
> +
> + @property
> + def sut_port_egress(self) -> Port:
> + """The egress port of the SUT node."""
> + return self.sut_ports[1 if self.type is TopologyType.two_links else 0]
> +
> + @property
> + def tg_port_ingress(self) -> Port:
> + """The ingress port of the TG node."""
> + return self.tg_ports[1 if self.type is TopologyType.two_links else 0]
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-10 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-03 15:16 [RFC PATCH 0/7] dts: revamp framework Luca Vizzarro
2025-02-03 15:16 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] dts: add port topology configuration Luca Vizzarro
2025-02-07 18:25 ` Nicholas Pratte
2025-02-03 15:16 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] dts: isolate test specification to config Luca Vizzarro
2025-02-10 19:09 ` Nicholas Pratte
2025-02-03 15:16 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] dts: revamp Topology model Luca Vizzarro
2025-02-10 19:42 ` Nicholas Pratte [this message]
2025-02-03 15:16 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] dts: improve Port model Luca Vizzarro
2025-02-03 15:16 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] dts: add runtime status Luca Vizzarro
2025-02-03 15:16 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] dts: add global runtime context Luca Vizzarro
2025-02-03 15:16 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] dts: revamp runtime internals Luca Vizzarro
2025-02-04 21:08 ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] dts: revamp framework Dean Marx
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKXZ7ejE83ODLObphUZ6i-n+CW-TmE+hes75t6wM0Q3fV+wAxw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=npratte@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=luca.vizzarro@arm.com \
--cc=paul.szczepanek@arm.com \
--cc=probb@iol.unh.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).