From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dorgreen1@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-la0-f50.google.com (mail-la0-f50.google.com
 [209.85.215.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B3029ADC
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:54:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: by laae1 with SMTP id e1so24015533laa.2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 03:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=VzTUo7D422qqUHqSW2u78uJd/ltGUdPOdDvnYRtQxW4=;
 b=WzlxOC75RwbYFWvkfE2l2ETvemtQYHj/amWNeYG9b68Qftrt1zyHZJT7wGvTfPRtUH
 DRE+TBO/bBUpdjxH+hz1ni9RpMDhSgyl4IMJ2+A0ZA55yKlOuK5SRfswIdHvoOCVLuAr
 PjhAgKabej/SeSvF1NVIDenxWBvRV+8Q4rTZJxH8Um7h/gsB8PsZ94VbYd9TiFeBU6+n
 crU0f3ZsEuLZ432yLnS/lhaUwMW1pN9CJYNy6q61o87bWIkxTmN//ArsaB9gqcQ1SJq8
 3PGRv9DH14e+TpO1Zwae8YW70gOE0InUVQpwcq2nViaV0zeADwYh2xlu9aL/9PwqV1k8
 x9oA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.17.68 with SMTP id m4mr3266323lbd.50.1427194454820; Tue,
 24 Mar 2015 03:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.41.194 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 03:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKedurwgpc6tgmZcc1wxKQKf-HU5fH9AvDSWzj+w3XJAn7F=iA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKedurxdjBt5FiCo0J=2V9d4=GEac6cBAxtWuXfwJ4hMX83L9w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150323145958.GA12720@bricha3-MOBL3>
 <CAMfgp3fXKRjjpLe72Muf5f+dtufZBKZ0Gq2Uj-SE=cDOQvFJRA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150323212459.GA5502@mhcomputing.net>
 <CAKedurwgpc6tgmZcc1wxKQKf-HU5fH9AvDSWzj+w3XJAn7F=iA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:54:14 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKedury9tLggYfH2Tgcxjf7AfFKgNkibHpMYNscSovhAuVSB5Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dor Green <dorgreen1@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Hall <mhall@mhcomputing.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Packet data out of bounds after rte_eth_rx_burst
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:54:15 -0000

I've managed to fix it so 1.8 works, and the segmentation fault still occurs.

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Dor Green <dorgreen1@gmail.com> wrote:
> I tried 1.8, but that fails to initialize my device and fails at the pci probe:
>     "Cause: Requested device 0000:04:00.1 cannot be used"
> Can't even compile 2.0rc2 atm, getting:
> "/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/include/emmintrin.h:701:1: note:
> expected '__m128i' but argument is of type 'int'"
> For reasons I don't understand.
>
> As for the example apps (in 1.7), I can run them properly but I don't
> think any of them do the same processing as I do. Note that mine does
> work with most packets.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Matthew Hall <mhall@mhcomputing.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 05:19:00PM +0200, Dor Green wrote:
>>> I changed it to free and it still happens. Note that the segmentation fault
>>> happens before that anyway.
>>>
>>> I am using 1.7.1 at the moment. I can try using a newer version.
>>
>> I'm using 1.7.X in my open-source DPDK-based app and it works, but I have an
>> IGB 1-gigabit NIC though, and how RX / TX work are quite driver specific of
>> course.
>>
>> I suspect there's some issue with how things are working in your IXGBE NIC
>> driver / setup. Do the same failures occur inside of the DPDK's own sample
>> apps?
>>
>> Matthew.