DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dor Green <dorgreen1@gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] rte_ring's dequeue appears to be slow
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 15:18:21 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKedurzQLk-gJCJw4uM6ObZwj+J+vPrZwBb7K22box-s-iFrzA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

I have an app which captures packets on a single core and then passes
to multiple workers on different lcores, using the ring queues.

While I manage to capture packets at 10Gbps, when I send it to the
processing lcores there is substantial packet loss. At first I figured
it's the processing I do on the packets and optimized that, which did
help it a little but did not alleviate the problem.

I used Intel VTune amplifier to profile the program, and on all
profiling checks that I did there, the majority of the time in the
program is spent in "__rte_ring_sc_do_dequeue" (about 70%). I was
wondering if anyone can tell me how to optimize this, or if I'm using
the queues incorrectly, or maybe even doing the profiling wrong
(because I do find it weird that this dequeuing is so slow).

My program architecture is as follows (replaced consts with actual values):

A queue is created for each processing lcore:
      rte_ring_create(qname, swsize, NUMA_SOCKET, 1024*1024,
RING_F_SP_ENQ | RING_F_SC_DEQ);

The processing core enqueues packets one by one, to each of the queues
(the packet burst size is 256):
     rte_ring_sp_enqueue(lc[queue_index].queue, (void *const)pkts[i]);

Which are then dequeued in bulk in the processor lcores:
     rte_ring_sc_dequeue_bulk(lc->queue, (void**) &mbufs, 128);

I'm using 16 1GB hugepages, running the new 2.0 version. If there's
any further info required about the program, let me know.

Thank you.

             reply	other threads:[~2015-04-06 12:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-06 12:18 Dor Green [this message]
2015-04-06 20:43 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-04-14 11:58   ` Dor Green

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKedurzQLk-gJCJw4uM6ObZwj+J+vPrZwBb7K22box-s-iFrzA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dorgreen1@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).