From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4DE7E80 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 18:15:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id z11so4121873lbi.41 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 09:24:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=iGm36wcLAS9626Xj8InpBNyN1YZ+hltf5DX3y4FeHtQ=; b=ASBnoypFr+mygQxb9Rl4xarqSKKlmKXYVnrvp5NEK9BuWMrPSQVu9a0KzX+OYh2vM8 wEvXi3YUAUUyy8TzZimEnOfWV10qsIlXfoWu/JnpXWnzG6Nc1VJ3WqZZHsdAXFviG6f1 koj5tvD5CYVWKQrsPNfzUmFk+VcBP5JF6AUeapWhTt3JEtlreMHHlCt4M0px32BR6HTR ngf3YeNRBKrMjOOk2g2BpZk4yUY6QafImetjDSwUEZevqFBKrneWAi+rL59JwZQVv2H9 BSSYvp3+sq5AJ/WsDtNz26IoziWQRIg6xhVah9uZUppg4YhErTLRS8uBUo7E+jghgLiU qp0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnZvXvxIqs7suTwoilwMEYXtSZVzINWVsXjeXMhK+4P1M7ONsKmOX8QNyu4/5F9Kl2kSIpf MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.156.168 with SMTP id wf8mr28713551lbb.28.1413822248031; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 09:24:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.215.141 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 09:24:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:24:08 +0300 Message-ID: From: Alex Markuze To: "dev@dpdk.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] nic loopback X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 16:15:57 -0000 Hi, I'm trying to send packets from an application to it self, meaning smac == dmac. I'm working with intel 82599 virtual function. But it seems that these packets are lost. Is there a software/hw limitation I'm missing here (some additional anti-spoofing)? AFAIK modern NICs with sriov are mini switches so the hw loopback should work, at least thats the theory. Thanks.