From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com (mail-lb0-f174.google.com [209.85.217.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15BECDE0 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 15:00:03 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-lb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id w7so8607338lbi.19 for ; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 06:00:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=kVpfVtSCoiwsNaqbzlfgicGDUWobPrRMhmTBWFCVZDs=; b=NpHOe9t9d5rEdgWPEl9IztArMZOtRQ1l8ahbzWOT4315h3aXtrV51i3GJYCxe1VvG7 sAvr++IdnQGzNzC3gZRa09eb0N8h9rayhwzzD/dHWkDB6nKSmmabCIjbyzz+8+ZXuN1l X8Jz6lDw+2+wwaPjqjmfSSc7l/GyUMOGOJ7Aw4a9dbgoC/79j/bDx5QpXXMKZG4ev4im NH4di1yeWVwOgz4IrusbyhM2RTmS7lv9sYgcqEzB9V7lL2HWcu0Qrm78mJCvXyOjaGO7 CDVeJiXARsPUww0NIAo7/kNoCXsQVF6n1l97E06P4RSOUX7xjFeXUeUPHolQbkmMyIFC nOlA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmBWyBzCCHUtI4qKanLAPOmKkyofAXqp7PbuIv7caGRKZWRo2+LuW9EBSidTBukMCSTkhOS MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.56.134 with SMTP id a6mr57297402lbq.25.1417442402610; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 06:00:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.215.208 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 06:00:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 16:00:02 +0200 Message-ID: From: Alex Markuze To: "dev@dpdk.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] i40 on dpdk 1.7 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 14:00:03 -0000 Hi, We are currently using dpdk 1.7, and I've seen lots of patches for the i40 pmd adding features and bug fixes. How much functionality for the xl-710 vf exists in dpdk 1.7 Thanks Alex