From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD40A0547; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:48:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579A84111F; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:48:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-yb1-f172.google.com (mail-yb1-f172.google.com [209.85.219.172]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15787410E1 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:48:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-yb1-f172.google.com with SMTP id v7so24497390ybq.0 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 06:48:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=maV+FvTn3mX36VD7hES7lh8HSmPd8UvYn/uZmfRyK/g=; b=XtpiCIIn7xj2tKJdDxQ240UiLi71IWD5PF1WD9RRnAaVg6nFLXjZZUjAVVnda3yGGc X0kH9C6/IJAk/MGxa1hmCPjpeO3fVWNqMt1zgWB7PyD57kJLq8lNRGPQaE5jDJvg7UjR bmK9SHQFMjwnY0vAW/al9VY2kO81T+ISllOM77EPF87QhcKyDJBh/LYMvpFgyL2jBQBk 06DP/Ha2cTfh7/fTiY/r+I6a07ucGsdiQUOAaoRaNb1Www98YA79XYhmsZGnEPiynjBJ 8Yxx3r4xVsSTBKcq2syhqLGTsz1E2TQI4Sk3RYhT6WLEDqL5Ke35Fw5L0ehJyRO8MNU/ LmSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=maV+FvTn3mX36VD7hES7lh8HSmPd8UvYn/uZmfRyK/g=; b=Y+xVn6vNOvIY1u+E0O6GhEvvM4JzyeSlj/417ZbX6y30hvYtgmNPgH72usIB+LtkuP dz/enWRPB5BNEOuEezRoIC4/qp8oRmG0bD0lhZ+f+l/R05RU1pCAMU0dFIK7hU9K7rGN bwpwp2KJ0RWQ72S4uad/s9MiiSp/NH7HiDKcgBliZ/DvzJk/KoQTI0J5zjN0z+Kflt6R KgVtadzegKdpWaozbBoHSRLFBJI8TGX75dAUq257Ie+9lHnO+sWJvb63t4QPn2T2xM5v YpyahGIMRUoVCQr863JvTYTt5B2ogQchurasC+VwO1YwLEuuXeIc4VumkAfhUFFTB2FX UlVw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ECbWCo1Rod8MUvTVsn5PG/XoQzERr3zBrtUh6tZdhLJPmAgPT Q82tKPiczzJJbjifbmCLjqb48DKDEut1fY7vDNTAdTO6 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyFWjorHGt7eEg/XPkCE3Et8++OnXkPB2VG30t4U4DCaj7cvBJxVEeZ+rbH96ae+djfMKuJKyuLakR79qHXsuU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:1142:: with SMTP id p2mr12774664ybu.279.1635515321138; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 06:48:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Magistro Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:48:30 -0400 Message-ID: To: dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: [dpdk-dev] Overriding rte_config.h X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" With the transition to meson, what is the best way to provide custom values to parameters in rte_config.h? When using makefiles, (from memory, I think) we used common_base as a template that was copied in as a replacement for defconfig_x86.... Our current thinking is to apply a locally maintained patch so that we can track custom values easier to the rte_config.h file unless there is another way to pass in an overridden value. As an example, one of the values we are customizing is IP_FRAG_MAX_FRAG. Cheers, Ben Magistro