From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7F046A5C; Thu, 26 Jun 2025 06:34:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3DD24067E; Thu, 26 Jun 2025 06:34:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ed1-f52.google.com (mail-ed1-f52.google.com [209.85.208.52]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0886F4060F; Thu, 26 Jun 2025 06:34:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ed1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-607ec30df2bso1070980a12.1; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 21:34:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1750912451; x=1751517251; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=UKdddVCTy85iXd1E+Ay+pg9YOz4UHG7hfftqffOBdS0=; b=A6ggHxsImcH8Hla9mvjhy91PhVzuIkoacUiZhm5PM6v+D4xgrk4QUUSF5BzZRqaHnv BUFkrmtYjqL7KVHo97jgg7/yoc8pD4XTq64eNpXSqwnODIepQLKEW6cMDZC/YugmIM6H oAWWmLG4W1emletkcSMmBtntlZqogEsljrDWXJsPb2HeNIjjIc7K+ZpyothjTfvLYlVb QN0kSl7DnHN3nFZJApJqp8mFPOWBms/ZJ/PcV1O59FiZlrfM8U8wU2T2q/I/Vg43cfB3 SH7Jdmnuyw0S73aP8UeTykhBRFRrcbByPW6gd/I4IN/ouDRp/4ah2UHsPOafXJJKrNAx v6qw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1750912451; x=1751517251; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=UKdddVCTy85iXd1E+Ay+pg9YOz4UHG7hfftqffOBdS0=; b=EJBgYeJow6UaV4m0WAlFHdEnLKSXlkjf4Bl/DaxBJXaMVAFXMpW2lVhuqKqHBRPnOU gF+XNo9mcs6YJw3a6VyKKLj4MpPIInav5Yvr/Ay/msTR0GJL2+OHySego2VbayWJh7VD 5+/WYGqiIOSxVIx6cP8IthzlyPWk2X17ZfgZh/8SKGuBN8vIjfeV4HGVgYhQ1rL4F6Md 8TpROziCgmtusOzyw0Lgk3k5MWBq+J1AlhmrgAWB6IwoKUzRtSJR/O/dwOC1PoLGrWZA OH75eWCGjhFBS4wWgGL1EIxdRy8xRxDCVS30xXdIQA42RBKjpNJOrqWBnbmSw6nvYw1X FV1A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWNSFFuBCIBl7ndzaXs4DS3fhe5/ZwCNS9ZSLoDOLhqdKUW205AW3z653UtIS6eWRceRIym+/Kz@dpdk.org, AJvYcCXpbUtkPNs0hPO3GEMyPmrLvSFT+ADWwQMEJSZA9XKAsI92yhvPjujbcqG8t4I9VkM8dsg=@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy5MXkXNJDQpKaCZYwA5jDgVFjUpAMdYZ7hEnsPF1a3JKDXKe6J hkYRnzHPNHPmXWc3exTGdKBPcD5T9AUqb9uGZ1FDTjSbd31iA0+scLfvZsrtFk51HJipk7mCVJl CLzywLNLxIYRj/irMJgyNQYu0DmYX+rSTxA== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctUijjIFEgBBGt4r8K05ZNoDlnKv+b06IUbG5nSxtgs1C0bD8UwiYz2axk5qms gdTAmJf7KBjtfKgHWpowvEYMZ1K2Wv0oUtshxf5eBDu9Ssodg+gqX18ePfWeOdtcwfOub2mztZC 7v9/YlHHSSAzowR3HWsU/2jVrQUXKfUPCwIgkHL36k6zH3pUDYUkBU X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH+8A+QOZl4tfv08GAyBIX8kwv2Qz0TjIqpUdb+bPzPAWMKTk+5ZZQmeZhf71wQr6a1s87z4aM/YoZjGDcEKzo= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:db0a:b0:ae0:9fce:c578 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-ae0be86192cmr582922266b.18.1750912451181; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 21:34:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20250621015624.35284-1-amiyaranjan.mohakud@gmail.com> <20250623181136.48239-1-amiyaranjan.mohakud@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Amiya Ranjan Mohakud Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 10:04:00 +0530 X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXzD8Uyv7CM8uvovmFFLaaHLTRoVos_xCqxOxYCzn_w5h0oVnsXKbI-pcm8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/iavf: fix VLAN offload strip flag To: Bruce Richardson Cc: "Loftus, Ciara" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "stable@dpdk.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000af80b10638721281" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org --000000000000af80b10638721281 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Just an additional note: It needs to be back ported to all LTS releases till v22.11. Hope it will be taken care of. Thanks Amiya On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 at 09:04, Amiya Ranjan Mohakud < amiyaranjan.mohakud@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Bruce and Ciara for the review/acceptance of the patch. > > Thanks > Amiya > > > On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 at 21:31, Bruce Richardson > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 02:01:15PM +0000, Loftus, Ciara wrote: >> > > >> > > Thanks. >> > > >> > > Just wanted to know - what are the next steps of the review and >> approval >> > > process? >> > > >> > > There is a test suite "ci/intel-Testing" failing now with v2 which >> passed in v1. ( >> > > We know for sure, there is absolutely no code change between v1 and v2 >> > > except the commit message). Is there a way to trigger the test suite >> again? >> > >> > Hi Amiya, >> > >> > There is no further action required on your end since the failure seems >> like an issue with the test infrastructure. If the maintainer for the intel >> next-net tree is happy with the patch they will pull it into the tree. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Ciara >> > >> Agree test failures look like false positives, as they are errors with the >> PF driver and virtio driver, while this patch changes the VF driver. >> >> Patch applied to dpdk-next-net-intel. >> >> Thanks, >> /Bruce >> > --000000000000af80b10638721281 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Just an additional note: It needs to= be back ported to all LTS releases till v22.11. Hope it will be taken care= of.

Thanks
Amiya

On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 at 09:04, Amiya Ranjan Mohakud &= lt;amiyaranjan.mohakud@gma= il.com> wrote:
Thanks=C2=A0Bruce and Ciara fo= r the review/acceptance of the patch.

Thanks
Amiya

On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 at 21:31, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>= wrote:
On Wed, = Jun 25, 2025 at 02:01:15PM +0000, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Just wanted to know=C2=A0 - what are the next steps of the review= and approval
> > process?
> >
> > There is a test suite "ci/intel-Testing" failing now wi= th v2 which passed in v1. (
> > We know for sure, there is absolutely no code change between v1 a= nd v2
> > except the commit message). Is there a way to trigger the test su= ite again?
>
> Hi Amiya,
>
> There is no further action required on your end since the failure seem= s like an issue with the test infrastructure. If the maintainer for the int= el next-net tree is happy with the patch they will pull it into the tree. >
> Thanks,
> Ciara
>
Agree test failures look like false positives, as they are errors with the<= br> PF driver and virtio driver, while this patch changes the VF driver.

Patch applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.

Thanks,
/Bruce
--000000000000af80b10638721281--