From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2512E46A58; Thu, 26 Jun 2025 05:34:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEFDC40A8A; Thu, 26 Jun 2025 05:34:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ej1-f42.google.com (mail-ej1-f42.google.com [209.85.218.42]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897144060F; Thu, 26 Jun 2025 05:34:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ej1-f42.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-adb4e36904bso113331566b.1; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 20:34:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1750908852; x=1751513652; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fSlpKloX2vhTWwlU3moTEaGtJU9uNL5MxpWH6IbOqco=; b=MZXFSUJLLMt82mxHPe2RCQ9S3qfQdrLYQpeFAqzYtJFIiJ3uUga5n7o0dde0VGCgPn yxQcGoecIi3wBYgaHLV7gl5gr/JkWzDZFjDobd/dQx/pYKD3I3jAWcXRY3em82smJcla B8p6vOolD+UQcGM5ZjASGbV9AEN55iS5n8pOVZ6NEL1+dv8LN6rMaWkCb+yvV91YEOwA mSKwpmls2JWFHZv1xysW9HASIJXd0CtZObG+2m/2FdGEQDhXP4EabMNrrUUal7EPoGT1 wE3vPmenjtqkqXCykMZ0r0IEqjw+KBORchelSimi2GvVK7kbb96ee5LPbeOCBpfi1dpb piYA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1750908852; x=1751513652; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=fSlpKloX2vhTWwlU3moTEaGtJU9uNL5MxpWH6IbOqco=; b=vfokNaAHY4NoJhNfISaq+AY+/I4BJkTaGlvVK4VcSUQVBC9z9TSIj4GvN/vyJ3ESI1 AnCBf1efzXMVJu/5GJ3lHWRom7/1i7xV7dy9H8EqWybZaQ6lx9OUf57KZoO7oQpIn/// bY1MuGE+66oYaDIKLFmVo9W0togKkJWShYfnIT8om03QEK1U4hr2V4Llg5uK8BDlVK8d k24bxZG9OT3cwRj6s13Mo4qIXTa3NSwNnTifBCWbFNRsUNSJo2B3HcTF+OmeyrhLrDk5 uWkyud7jML+gLas42sv9Ke+oZLo6hWJoMxV0MeW1IRL3k47F9MAV6KjsjREkOnmPkDtX 3QBQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW1lHxm7nSxLnzZFFZS+NhRq5RRjvcuIlWxETlrb9nyDRUtEWD9IaIL4GiYCwoKjiq5Z7Q=@dpdk.org, AJvYcCXU6FFOjn6M3557w8loNZ00U/G/k2JgbidAXGo4/OlKU+oC8Jrg62ZA76dnECnHJk1V7HhxTzCP@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwJNEn7eMdwXdD62bV/pWOO20VHRY8JlzqcWqRJlJkQpkuYztdE E8f9HVKZ5Ewosb6RSif5qglXDTQqDo0rfEt2WC9bn/e0i9fiGSrOdySvwrYPZb/mUpRKllynWRZ 2FRVTwrjc/dYM8kHPT5yj8ovdwU3ptzZtrA== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuELwUhh5weVecyX38ZsmtaA5Eks46o6+GTyAKcfwsY8LOJw2WXUHeeKv8e8Pf huUrNZgkwJnPTyR29SFYUL2Gl76DOY/4MNVQ+ldubBwxZuzqP8fs/g3ZgqTHO5fEoPSWfy4nrft 03/bsFjOiA3oYQj4fw3HIY4SdeEqkfjxOENy2lWCBjIg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGplPINaERwo1XIWu8txRrt204Uo8I8DdTXWSlK+2a1Tajolf2SPxKaFrWiUzP6u0+ccu6EQKuWC+DAKDMbohE= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6a0c:b0:ae0:5137:fc44 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-ae0be85f47bmr613940766b.18.1750908851655; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 20:34:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20250621015624.35284-1-amiyaranjan.mohakud@gmail.com> <20250623181136.48239-1-amiyaranjan.mohakud@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Amiya Ranjan Mohakud Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 09:04:00 +0530 X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXz6c1dMHNoF8Vb_u3mptQXoED3FEnRzhMCB351vg9hDIFPz27oUE_q3FXA Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/iavf: fix VLAN offload strip flag To: Bruce Richardson Cc: "Loftus, Ciara" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "stable@dpdk.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002318820638713c63" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org --0000000000002318820638713c63 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Thanks Bruce and Ciara for the review/acceptance of the patch. Thanks Amiya On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 at 21:31, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 02:01:15PM +0000, Loftus, Ciara wrote: > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Just wanted to know - what are the next steps of the review and > approval > > > process? > > > > > > There is a test suite "ci/intel-Testing" failing now with v2 which > passed in v1. ( > > > We know for sure, there is absolutely no code change between v1 and v2 > > > except the commit message). Is there a way to trigger the test suite > again? > > > > Hi Amiya, > > > > There is no further action required on your end since the failure seems > like an issue with the test infrastructure. If the maintainer for the intel > next-net tree is happy with the patch they will pull it into the tree. > > > > Thanks, > > Ciara > > > Agree test failures look like false positives, as they are errors with the > PF driver and virtio driver, while this patch changes the VF driver. > > Patch applied to dpdk-next-net-intel. > > Thanks, > /Bruce > --0000000000002318820638713c63 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks=C2=A0Bruce and Ciara for the = review/acceptance of the patch.

Thanks
Amiya


On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 at 2= 1:31, Bruce Richardson <br= uce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 02:01:15PM +0000, Loftus, C= iara wrote:
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Just wanted to know=C2=A0 - what are the next steps of the review= and approval
> > process?
> >
> > There is a test suite "ci/intel-Testing" failing now wi= th v2 which passed in v1. (
> > We know for sure, there is absolutely no code change between v1 a= nd v2
> > except the commit message). Is there a way to trigger the test su= ite again?
>
> Hi Amiya,
>
> There is no further action required on your end since the failure seem= s like an issue with the test infrastructure. If the maintainer for the int= el next-net tree is happy with the patch they will pull it into the tree. >
> Thanks,
> Ciara
>
Agree test failures look like false positives, as they are errors with the<= br> PF driver and virtio driver, while this patch changes the VF driver.

Patch applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.

Thanks,
/Bruce
--0000000000002318820638713c63--