From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C3DA0598;
	Sat, 18 Apr 2020 12:05:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93751E92D;
	Sat, 18 Apr 2020 12:05:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-il1-f194.google.com (mail-il1-f194.google.com
 [209.85.166.194]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247331C29D
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 12:05:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-il1-f194.google.com with SMTP id s10so3996427iln.11
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 03:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=1vmft9WKNlZg/crcuOoHu2QUSBI4IVaZlwOxtNbeH18=;
 b=Gq8QPUTkMw8SOBkMGXpaAqnC0YPyBd5KwE/gCnRHqonP0CII6KRwFkTEZFssNbrGky
 5NcaJEK+Q8WEAPjd8Qro2irh8KkP+08sPGDoxyXiLp4X+HVQddUY2pZrseFGmwsBtdZ+
 7uJmxY7+Rfc+1AJPJ9DFgaJJ2cri5e0Stw+e0XmJo9Hsf9fHnsHTe+lfGjq85bWes429
 BvlwQfTiZfvX3Vt4rJUPx2ikSL2xKg0ZiE7XzDIBAxYovYMmDHPopefOh1WjBEcstAtJ
 zSjKs0ZZ7SeV+Q2iOMlnOr2JadLY9D3OFyFNAjbK3jXQUFuuJuxL9aT/HZ6HxFtZp+4E
 P9nw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=1vmft9WKNlZg/crcuOoHu2QUSBI4IVaZlwOxtNbeH18=;
 b=qAYluZNgHNxKISVDESvE/6Fnka3MAAMagXpraIu1F1jwdmGexsUC1W2ZGS0wONVvXe
 AsKF1Uxo55B2ea7/dO/gnR0+fkIeIt82Oeb8ievCay/0mL93TSh8UUgzWfHK5WrOCNet
 Qb2BMChhcVrbED2FeWGgPQJSb1a48kEOUYoCsUB7Lgkb1UnXzkbxm93tA1zPTWOzVl4c
 JwHYdRyKHCTpNB/swEMKL7X19MYDwvgeVY5lw7lF+Buqs84fmM84iXdM+Y3hGKpSsizQ
 2VllspV95q4OCLS6Ekuca2/pirOGfeH1KAbu+3e9sDKP8pbyfhrSsF5fKkTH7rBcgMyD
 NpWg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Puag35SvSkAaNrAcWRq4V+pThBbE/FlinkVIhDkFTHOSEZPHCDB5
 iVm9/jVvHbeMvYLTh8uvJzc7iElG8i1Vqi0fMeg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypL5Z6//CaMOPgcVJWoMCV0e6hcoCde/0O7fEBCoyVIMHFOYXLhZ9tCyTnOvgcDnCSi9CFydUWLZ4j3aV8U8zNQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:9edb:: with SMTP id s88mr7455226ilk.294.1587204328342; 
 Sat, 18 Apr 2020 03:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200417215739.23180-1-l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>
 <20200417215739.23180-5-l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>
 <BYAPR18MB2424D1BD5D8F027B8E782CBFC8D60@BYAPR18MB2424.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
 <4136788.dT8XKq9c71@thomas>
In-Reply-To: <4136788.dT8XKq9c71@thomas>
From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 15:35:12 +0530
Message-ID: <CALBAE1MgjfmnDjTKmTUhTRx0tV2+yQytDr_Ad417wJ5uWQLiZA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>,
 Nikhil Rao <nikhil.rao@intel.com>, 
 Erik Gabriel Carrillo <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>,
 Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>, 
 "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v1 04/17] eventdev: replace library
 debug flag with global one
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 3:23 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> 18/04/2020 11:41, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran:
> > From: Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>
> > > Use global debug flag RTE_DEBUG instead of RTE_LIBRTE_EVENTDEV_DEBUG.
> > > The old define is completely removed from source code and config.
> >
> >
> > May I know the rational for this change?
>
> You know the rationale, it was discussed several times in Technical Board:

If I already know the rationale, Why should I ask in ml?


> we are limiting the number of compilation options, and meson config does
> not propose them.
>
> > Other subsystem like ethdev still have CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ETHDEV_DEBUG=n.
>
> No, look at the other patches in the series.
>
> > If we decide to make RTE_DEBUG then please submit the patch for all subsystem
> > across the DPDK.
>
> Yes, this is what Lukasz did.

I missed the series. I just thought it is a single email due to email
filters. My bad.


>
>
>