From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A71A0588; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 15:31:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C951DCA8; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 15:31:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-il1-f193.google.com (mail-il1-f193.google.com [209.85.166.193]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B133E1DC8E for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 15:31:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-il1-f193.google.com with SMTP id b18so6899637ilf.2 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 06:31:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=z8ifj9QQjoeB75tTEgTP4TaBf/CXfH06el9plh7y1Ic=; b=GEvMfXo4XN0NhCcXJjj2GckZhPxkJ2+ix+ChllrLHHCB7Bl9xqOqJGK9mMEd282MH0 bc2VFiFi0eltpRNoPEjg1hljNnjkBowki/24c77yqHVEHA1WE+hRhD6AFG3AE2ccijbA ebe4S5oEk6ppSW0HrNFnz/xxgtW8mV20Lj7m+K809+cUpspFE51w2EMYwoWX8nB7mIt/ 61JSjgDuKhWmtcU/wq4A/pW4Zant+CZ3FkKgwZDu7gMb0V1BNtrdohyHVK3IYv1jwIBh Wa341ZgEPXQ0RvXulvCuecfiogFBaPrsy7y9wFn3HMt9ddxS0FBLCuHbsF1HOIzP9M8Y toCA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=z8ifj9QQjoeB75tTEgTP4TaBf/CXfH06el9plh7y1Ic=; b=XjytGcVdSRiERzAVvDEzJOE8tUf6RSK3I23SV5RDE6lVH5dyjYnkvNBOWX3G5eGDxW +FjsHANPx8RK7MqP9Q7LsqGbzfisQwKtaaU4m13nLfw5TLdOrVpUQueq0aDqxmThV5MD IdNnAtqtb6q5gQiK5NdvU3Z35JaZBIPEUF4nGDEXfgcfJIsnbJkV8bUMG2v0xUmdOkqn RQGKrPrqqKPTIfsuz2gLOJNXzN3zgSiucJqhmskbLsIV5Ow6ACevBi+4MDaoDv1JExxS AyV+ZIE3Lgg6jq7ql3fK2DxwpawscGItwfKWvRWwsGjzM3pkvHL6h8O3e1as4m3SE1kf 3gWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuacmXlSEFfnTc77IdlA+RwXUa2cHuV4o2alpSZsytjnkTdJyMVt IxGyBZDEGDeM2iNVtrCipgKq4JkBFCv4AVhkubM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJJ3BMycE2QqSv9/iO3eEQy/PWpSTRGvBExNSlN1dSG56IK1FH+4luzTG+hD4yJypjZ+mVIZPcCQbpx7XJAmNc= X-Received: by 2002:a92:9942:: with SMTP id p63mr1197289ili.130.1587043863022; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 06:31:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200416110053.2547791-1-thomas@monjalon.net> In-Reply-To: From: Jerin Jacob Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:00:47 +0530 Message-ID: To: Aaron Conole Cc: Thomas Monjalon , dpdk-dev , David Marchand , "Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" , Gavin Hu , Honnappa Nagarahalli , Michael Santana Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ci: remove aarch64 from Travis jobs X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 6:14 PM Aaron Conole wrote: > > Thomas Monjalon writes: > > > Travis is not reliable for native Arm and PPC: > > https://travis-ci.community/t/disk-quota-exceeded-on-arm64/7619/6 > > > > In order to get reliable Travis reports, > > the use of Arm machines is removed until Travis fixes it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > > --- > > We should add back the cross-build if we do this - at least then we > could have a reliable compilation test of Arm64 code. Does it make > sense? +1 >