* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] net/thunderx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux @ 2021-10-04 12:01 Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula 2021-10-04 12:49 ` Ferruh Yigit 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula @ 2021-10-04 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ferruh Yigit, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran, Maciej Czekaj [C]; +Cc: dev >On 10/4/2021 12:34 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: >>> On 10/4/2021 11:02 AM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: >>>>> On 10/4/2021 6:56 AM, pbhagavatula@marvell.com wrote: >>>>>> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> Due to Linux kernel AF(Admin function) driver dependency, only >>>>> enable >>>>>> build for 64-bit Linux. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Pavan, >>>>> >>>>> Isn't it possible to provide a commit log in the kernel side etc, that >let >>>>> others to verify why only 64 bit is required, or if someone want to >>>>> support >>>>> 32bit that may help them to investigate the source of the >restriction. >>>> >>>> Arch 32 support is not implemented on ThunderX, so 32bit will not >>> run. >>>> >>> >>> I see, is following correct: >>> All thunderx, octeonx & octeontx2 only supports VF in the DPDK, >and PF >>> is >>> supported by Linux kernel driver. And Linux kernel driver doesn't >>> support arch32. >> >> AF != PF, AF is something that manages all the shared resources >between PF/VF. >> > >I see, I though AF is part of PF functionality. Are there two different >kernel >modules for PF and AF? > >So can DPDK driver drive PF? In a way, PF by DPDK, VF by DPDK, AF by >Linux >kernel driver. Yup that’s correct. > >>> >>> Is something changed in kernel driver side to drop the 32bit support? >>> If it was not supported at all, what is the motivation to disable the >DPDK >>> drivers now? >>> >> >> It was never supported to begin with, motivation is that build will fail if >we try to >> compile with 32b. >> > >If there is no plan to support 32bit in the kernel side, that is reasonable >to >disable 32bit build, please provide above details in the commit log. > >And after above said, how much maintenance cost to support 32bit, if >the build >error is on the logging format "%lx" etc .. (as we mostly have 32bit build >errors), it is better to fix them using 'PRIx64' which is more proper way >anyway. If there is more logical issue with 32bit pointers, I agree with >you to >disable it. >Can you please provided the build error in the commit log as record? > Apologies, I meant that all the functions that don’t fall under 64b are stubbed out so the driver wouldn’t work. >>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com> >>>>>> Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> v5 Changes >>>>>> - s/fuction/function. >>>>>> >>>>>> v4 Changes: >>>>>> - Update commit message regarding dependency on AF driver. >>>>>> >>>>>> drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build | 4 ++-- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build >>>>> b/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build >>>>>> index 4bbcea7f93..da665bd76f 100644 >>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build >>>>>> @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ >>>>>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause >>>>>> # Copyright(c) 2017 Cavium, Inc >>>>>> >>>>>> -if is_windows >>>>>> +if not is_linux or not dpdk_conf.get('RTE_ARCH_64') >>>>>> build = false >>>>>> - reason = 'not supported on Windows' >>>>>> + reason = 'only supported on 64-bit Linux' >>>>>> subdir_done() >>>>>> endif >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> 2.17.1 >>>>>> >>>> >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] net/thunderx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux 2021-10-04 12:01 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] net/thunderx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula @ 2021-10-04 12:49 ` Ferruh Yigit 2021-10-04 12:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2021-10-04 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran, Maciej Czekaj [C] Cc: dev On 10/4/2021 1:01 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: >> On 10/4/2021 12:34 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: >>>> On 10/4/2021 11:02 AM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: >>>>>> On 10/4/2021 6:56 AM, pbhagavatula@marvell.com wrote: >>>>>>> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Due to Linux kernel AF(Admin function) driver dependency, only >>>>>> enable >>>>>>> build for 64-bit Linux. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Pavan, >>>>>> >>>>>> Isn't it possible to provide a commit log in the kernel side etc, that >> let >>>>>> others to verify why only 64 bit is required, or if someone want to >>>>>> support >>>>>> 32bit that may help them to investigate the source of the >> restriction. >>>>> >>>>> Arch 32 support is not implemented on ThunderX, so 32bit will not >>>> run. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I see, is following correct: >>>> All thunderx, octeonx & octeontx2 only supports VF in the DPDK, >> and PF >>>> is >>>> supported by Linux kernel driver. And Linux kernel driver doesn't >>>> support arch32. >>> >>> AF != PF, AF is something that manages all the shared resources >> between PF/VF. >>> >> >> I see, I though AF is part of PF functionality. Are there two different >> kernel >> modules for PF and AF? >> >> So can DPDK driver drive PF? In a way, PF by DPDK, VF by DPDK, AF by >> Linux >> kernel driver. > > Yup that’s correct. > >> >>>> >>>> Is something changed in kernel driver side to drop the 32bit support? >>>> If it was not supported at all, what is the motivation to disable the >> DPDK >>>> drivers now? >>>> >>> >>> It was never supported to begin with, motivation is that build will fail if >> we try to >>> compile with 32b. >>> >> >> If there is no plan to support 32bit in the kernel side, that is reasonable >> to >> disable 32bit build, please provide above details in the commit log. >> >> And after above said, how much maintenance cost to support 32bit, if >> the build >> error is on the logging format "%lx" etc .. (as we mostly have 32bit build >> errors), it is better to fix them using 'PRIx64' which is more proper way >> anyway. If there is more logical issue with 32bit pointers, I agree with >> you to >> disable it. >> Can you please provided the build error in the commit log as record? >> > > Apologies, I meant that all the functions that don’t fall under 64b are stubbed out > so the driver wouldn’t work. > so is there build error or not? >>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com> >>>>>>> Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> v5 Changes >>>>>>> - s/fuction/function. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> v4 Changes: >>>>>>> - Update commit message regarding dependency on AF driver. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build | 4 ++-- >>>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build >>>>>> b/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build >>>>>>> index 4bbcea7f93..da665bd76f 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build >>>>>>> @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ >>>>>>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause >>>>>>> # Copyright(c) 2017 Cavium, Inc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -if is_windows >>>>>>> +if not is_linux or not dpdk_conf.get('RTE_ARCH_64') >>>>>>> build = false >>>>>>> - reason = 'not supported on Windows' >>>>>>> + reason = 'only supported on 64-bit Linux' >>>>>>> subdir_done() >>>>>>> endif >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> 2.17.1 >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] net/thunderx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux 2021-10-04 12:49 ` Ferruh Yigit @ 2021-10-04 12:54 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula 2021-10-08 15:30 ` Ferruh Yigit 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula @ 2021-10-04 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ferruh Yigit, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran, Maciej Czekaj [C]; +Cc: dev >On 10/4/2021 1:01 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: >>> On 10/4/2021 12:34 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: >>>>> On 10/4/2021 11:02 AM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: >>>>>>> On 10/4/2021 6:56 AM, pbhagavatula@marvell.com wrote: >>>>>>>> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Due to Linux kernel AF(Admin function) driver dependency, >only >>>>>>> enable >>>>>>>> build for 64-bit Linux. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Pavan, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Isn't it possible to provide a commit log in the kernel side etc, >that >>> let >>>>>>> others to verify why only 64 bit is required, or if someone want >to >>>>>>> support >>>>>>> 32bit that may help them to investigate the source of the >>> restriction. >>>>>> >>>>>> Arch 32 support is not implemented on ThunderX, so 32bit will >not >>>>> run. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I see, is following correct: >>>>> All thunderx, octeonx & octeontx2 only supports VF in the DPDK, >>> and PF >>>>> is >>>>> supported by Linux kernel driver. And Linux kernel driver doesn't >>>>> support arch32. >>>> >>>> AF != PF, AF is something that manages all the shared resources >>> between PF/VF. >>>> >>> >>> I see, I though AF is part of PF functionality. Are there two different >>> kernel >>> modules for PF and AF? >>> >>> So can DPDK driver drive PF? In a way, PF by DPDK, VF by DPDK, AF >by >>> Linux >>> kernel driver. >> >> Yup that’s correct. >> >>> >>>>> >>>>> Is something changed in kernel driver side to drop the 32bit >support? >>>>> If it was not supported at all, what is the motivation to disable the >>> DPDK >>>>> drivers now? >>>>> >>>> >>>> It was never supported to begin with, motivation is that build will >fail if >>> we try to >>>> compile with 32b. >>>> >>> >>> If there is no plan to support 32bit in the kernel side, that is >reasonable >>> to >>> disable 32bit build, please provide above details in the commit log. >>> >>> And after above said, how much maintenance cost to support 32bit, >if >>> the build >>> error is on the logging format "%lx" etc .. (as we mostly have 32bit >build >>> errors), it is better to fix them using 'PRIx64' which is more proper >way >>> anyway. If there is more logical issue with 32bit pointers, I agree with >>> you to >>> disable it. >>> Can you please provided the build error in the commit log as record? >>> >> >> Apologies, I meant that all the functions that don’t fall under 64b are >stubbed out >> so the driver wouldn’t work. >> > >so is there build error or not? > No build error. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com> >>>>>>>> Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com> >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> v5 Changes >>>>>>>> - s/fuction/function. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> v4 Changes: >>>>>>>> - Update commit message regarding dependency on AF >driver. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build | 4 ++-- >>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build >>>>>>> b/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build >>>>>>>> index 4bbcea7f93..da665bd76f 100644 >>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build >>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build >>>>>>>> @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ >>>>>>>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause >>>>>>>> # Copyright(c) 2017 Cavium, Inc >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -if is_windows >>>>>>>> +if not is_linux or not dpdk_conf.get('RTE_ARCH_64') >>>>>>>> build = false >>>>>>>> - reason = 'not supported on Windows' >>>>>>>> + reason = 'only supported on 64-bit Linux' >>>>>>>> subdir_done() >>>>>>>> endif >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> 2.17.1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] net/thunderx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux 2021-10-04 12:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula @ 2021-10-08 15:30 ` Ferruh Yigit 2021-10-10 9:38 ` Jerin Jacob 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2021-10-08 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran, Maciej Czekaj [C] Cc: dev, Bruce Richardson On 10/4/2021 1:54 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: >> On 10/4/2021 1:01 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: >>>> On 10/4/2021 12:34 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: >>>>>> On 10/4/2021 11:02 AM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: >>>>>>>> On 10/4/2021 6:56 AM, pbhagavatula@marvell.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Due to Linux kernel AF(Admin function) driver dependency, >> only >>>>>>>> enable >>>>>>>>> build for 64-bit Linux. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Pavan, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Isn't it possible to provide a commit log in the kernel side etc, >> that >>>> let >>>>>>>> others to verify why only 64 bit is required, or if someone want >> to >>>>>>>> support >>>>>>>> 32bit that may help them to investigate the source of the >>>> restriction. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Arch 32 support is not implemented on ThunderX, so 32bit will >> not >>>>>> run. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I see, is following correct: >>>>>> All thunderx, octeonx & octeontx2 only supports VF in the DPDK, >>>> and PF >>>>>> is >>>>>> supported by Linux kernel driver. And Linux kernel driver doesn't >>>>>> support arch32. >>>>> >>>>> AF != PF, AF is something that manages all the shared resources >>>> between PF/VF. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I see, I though AF is part of PF functionality. Are there two different >>>> kernel >>>> modules for PF and AF? >>>> >>>> So can DPDK driver drive PF? In a way, PF by DPDK, VF by DPDK, AF >> by >>>> Linux >>>> kernel driver. >>> >>> Yup that’s correct. >>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Is something changed in kernel driver side to drop the 32bit >> support? >>>>>> If it was not supported at all, what is the motivation to disable the >>>> DPDK >>>>>> drivers now? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It was never supported to begin with, motivation is that build will >> fail if >>>> we try to >>>>> compile with 32b. >>>>> >>>> >>>> If there is no plan to support 32bit in the kernel side, that is >> reasonable >>>> to >>>> disable 32bit build, please provide above details in the commit log. >>>> >>>> And after above said, how much maintenance cost to support 32bit, >> if >>>> the build >>>> error is on the logging format "%lx" etc .. (as we mostly have 32bit >> build >>>> errors), it is better to fix them using 'PRIx64' which is more proper >> way >>>> anyway. If there is more logical issue with 32bit pointers, I agree with >>>> you to >>>> disable it. >>>> Can you please provided the build error in the commit log as record? >>>> >>> >>> Apologies, I meant that all the functions that don’t fall under 64b are >> stubbed out >>> so the driver wouldn’t work. >>> >> >> so is there build error or not? >> > > No build error. > Just trying to clarify, Linux kernel AF kernel driver only build for 64-bit Linux. And mentioned DPDK drivers have a dependency to this kernel module. But DPDK drivers are userspace application, can't 32-bit application run on 64-bit Linux? Can you please clarify what exactly is not supported? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com> >>>>>>>>> Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com> >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> v5 Changes >>>>>>>>> - s/fuction/function. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> v4 Changes: >>>>>>>>> - Update commit message regarding dependency on AF >> driver. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build | 4 ++-- >>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build >>>>>>>> b/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build >>>>>>>>> index 4bbcea7f93..da665bd76f 100644 >>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build >>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build >>>>>>>>> @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ >>>>>>>>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause >>>>>>>>> # Copyright(c) 2017 Cavium, Inc >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -if is_windows >>>>>>>>> +if not is_linux or not dpdk_conf.get('RTE_ARCH_64') >>>>>>>>> build = false >>>>>>>>> - reason = 'not supported on Windows' >>>>>>>>> + reason = 'only supported on 64-bit Linux' >>>>>>>>> subdir_done() >>>>>>>>> endif >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> 2.17.1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] net/thunderx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux 2021-10-08 15:30 ` Ferruh Yigit @ 2021-10-10 9:38 ` Jerin Jacob 2021-10-11 11:41 ` Ferruh Yigit 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Jerin Jacob @ 2021-10-10 9:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran, Maciej Czekaj [C], dev, Bruce Richardson On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 9:00 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote: > > On 10/4/2021 1:54 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: > >> On 10/4/2021 1:01 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: > >>>> On 10/4/2021 12:34 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: > >>>>>> On 10/4/2021 11:02 AM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 10/4/2021 6:56 AM, pbhagavatula@marvell.com wrote: > >>>>>>>>> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Due to Linux kernel AF(Admin function) driver dependency, > >> only > >>>>>>>> enable > >>>>>>>>> build for 64-bit Linux. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi Pavan, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Isn't it possible to provide a commit log in the kernel side etc, > >> that > >>>> let > >>>>>>>> others to verify why only 64 bit is required, or if someone want > >> to > >>>>>>>> support > >>>>>>>> 32bit that may help them to investigate the source of the > >>>> restriction. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Arch 32 support is not implemented on ThunderX, so 32bit will > >> not > >>>>>> run. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I see, is following correct: > >>>>>> All thunderx, octeonx & octeontx2 only supports VF in the DPDK, > >>>> and PF > >>>>>> is > >>>>>> supported by Linux kernel driver. And Linux kernel driver doesn't > >>>>>> support arch32. > >>>>> > >>>>> AF != PF, AF is something that manages all the shared resources > >>>> between PF/VF. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> I see, I though AF is part of PF functionality. Are there two different > >>>> kernel > >>>> modules for PF and AF? > >>>> > >>>> So can DPDK driver drive PF? In a way, PF by DPDK, VF by DPDK, AF > >> by > >>>> Linux > >>>> kernel driver. > >>> > >>> Yup that’s correct. > >>> > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Is something changed in kernel driver side to drop the 32bit > >> support? > >>>>>> If it was not supported at all, what is the motivation to disable the > >>>> DPDK > >>>>>> drivers now? > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> It was never supported to begin with, motivation is that build will > >> fail if > >>>> we try to > >>>>> compile with 32b. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> If there is no plan to support 32bit in the kernel side, that is > >> reasonable > >>>> to > >>>> disable 32bit build, please provide above details in the commit log. > >>>> > >>>> And after above said, how much maintenance cost to support 32bit, > >> if > >>>> the build > >>>> error is on the logging format "%lx" etc .. (as we mostly have 32bit > >> build > >>>> errors), it is better to fix them using 'PRIx64' which is more proper > >> way > >>>> anyway. If there is more logical issue with 32bit pointers, I agree with > >>>> you to > >>>> disable it. > >>>> Can you please provided the build error in the commit log as record? > >>>> > >>> > >>> Apologies, I meant that all the functions that don’t fall under 64b are > >> stubbed out > >>> so the driver wouldn’t work. > >>> > >> > >> so is there build error or not? > >> > > > > No build error. > > > > Just trying to clarify, > > Linux kernel AF kernel driver only build for 64-bit Linux. > And mentioned DPDK drivers have a dependency to this kernel module. > > But DPDK drivers are userspace application, can't 32-bit application > run on 64-bit Linux? > > Can you please clarify what exactly is not supported? armv8 specification has two operating modes, 1) AArch32 mode, where a 32 bit application can run on armv8 2) AArch64 mode, where it is native 64bit support. In Thunderx and Octeon families, AArch32 mode is not implemented to save the power and RTL cost. So it can never use AArch32 32bit mode. There was an attempt to emulate 32bit mode in 64 bit like X32_ABI, it is called IPL32 in arm64, that never became mainstream. So 32bit application can not run on ThunderX/Octeontx so we would like to remove building this option to avoid removing the cost of maintaining it. > > > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com> > >>>>>>>>> Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com> > >>>>>>>>> --- > >>>>>>>>> v5 Changes > >>>>>>>>> - s/fuction/function. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> v4 Changes: > >>>>>>>>> - Update commit message regarding dependency on AF > >> driver. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build | 4 ++-- > >>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build > >>>>>>>> b/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build > >>>>>>>>> index 4bbcea7f93..da665bd76f 100644 > >>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build > >>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build > >>>>>>>>> @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ > >>>>>>>>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause > >>>>>>>>> # Copyright(c) 2017 Cavium, Inc > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -if is_windows > >>>>>>>>> +if not is_linux or not dpdk_conf.get('RTE_ARCH_64') > >>>>>>>>> build = false > >>>>>>>>> - reason = 'not supported on Windows' > >>>>>>>>> + reason = 'only supported on 64-bit Linux' > >>>>>>>>> subdir_done() > >>>>>>>>> endif > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>> 2.17.1 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] net/thunderx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux 2021-10-10 9:38 ` Jerin Jacob @ 2021-10-11 11:41 ` Ferruh Yigit 2021-10-11 11:44 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2021-10-11 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jerin Jacob Cc: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran, Maciej Czekaj [C], dev, Bruce Richardson On 10/10/2021 10:38 AM, Jerin Jacob wrote: > On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 9:00 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote: >> >> On 10/4/2021 1:54 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: >>>> On 10/4/2021 1:01 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: >>>>>> On 10/4/2021 12:34 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: >>>>>>>> On 10/4/2021 11:02 AM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 10/4/2021 6:56 AM, pbhagavatula@marvell.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Due to Linux kernel AF(Admin function) driver dependency, >>>> only >>>>>>>>>> enable >>>>>>>>>>> build for 64-bit Linux. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Pavan, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Isn't it possible to provide a commit log in the kernel side etc, >>>> that >>>>>> let >>>>>>>>>> others to verify why only 64 bit is required, or if someone want >>>> to >>>>>>>>>> support >>>>>>>>>> 32bit that may help them to investigate the source of the >>>>>> restriction. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Arch 32 support is not implemented on ThunderX, so 32bit will >>>> not >>>>>>>> run. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I see, is following correct: >>>>>>>> All thunderx, octeonx & octeontx2 only supports VF in the DPDK, >>>>>> and PF >>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>> supported by Linux kernel driver. And Linux kernel driver doesn't >>>>>>>> support arch32. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> AF != PF, AF is something that manages all the shared resources >>>>>> between PF/VF. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I see, I though AF is part of PF functionality. Are there two different >>>>>> kernel >>>>>> modules for PF and AF? >>>>>> >>>>>> So can DPDK driver drive PF? In a way, PF by DPDK, VF by DPDK, AF >>>> by >>>>>> Linux >>>>>> kernel driver. >>>>> >>>>> Yup that’s correct. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is something changed in kernel driver side to drop the 32bit >>>> support? >>>>>>>> If it was not supported at all, what is the motivation to disable the >>>>>> DPDK >>>>>>>> drivers now? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It was never supported to begin with, motivation is that build will >>>> fail if >>>>>> we try to >>>>>>> compile with 32b. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If there is no plan to support 32bit in the kernel side, that is >>>> reasonable >>>>>> to >>>>>> disable 32bit build, please provide above details in the commit log. >>>>>> >>>>>> And after above said, how much maintenance cost to support 32bit, >>>> if >>>>>> the build >>>>>> error is on the logging format "%lx" etc .. (as we mostly have 32bit >>>> build >>>>>> errors), it is better to fix them using 'PRIx64' which is more proper >>>> way >>>>>> anyway. If there is more logical issue with 32bit pointers, I agree with >>>>>> you to >>>>>> disable it. >>>>>> Can you please provided the build error in the commit log as record? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Apologies, I meant that all the functions that don’t fall under 64b are >>>> stubbed out >>>>> so the driver wouldn’t work. >>>>> >>>> >>>> so is there build error or not? >>>> >>> >>> No build error. >>> >> >> Just trying to clarify, >> >> Linux kernel AF kernel driver only build for 64-bit Linux. >> And mentioned DPDK drivers have a dependency to this kernel module. >> >> But DPDK drivers are userspace application, can't 32-bit application >> run on 64-bit Linux? >> >> Can you please clarify what exactly is not supported? > > > armv8 specification has two operating modes, > > 1) AArch32 mode, where a 32 bit application can run on armv8 > 2) AArch64 mode, where it is native 64bit support. > > In Thunderx and Octeon families, AArch32 mode is not implemented to save > the power and RTL cost. So it can never use AArch32 32bit mode. > > There was an attempt to emulate 32bit mode in 64 bit like X32_ABI, it > is called IPL32 in arm64, that never became mainstream. So 32bit application > can not run on ThunderX/Octeontx so we would like to remove building this option > to avoid removing the cost of maintaining it. > > Thanks for the clarification, so main motivation is not the AF driver dependency? Can you please put above description to the commit log in next version? Thanks, ferruh > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com> >>>>>>>>>>> Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com> >>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>> v5 Changes >>>>>>>>>>> - s/fuction/function. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> v4 Changes: >>>>>>>>>>> - Update commit message regarding dependency on AF >>>> driver. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build | 4 ++-- >>>>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build >>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build >>>>>>>>>>> index 4bbcea7f93..da665bd76f 100644 >>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build >>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build >>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ >>>>>>>>>>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause >>>>>>>>>>> # Copyright(c) 2017 Cavium, Inc >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -if is_windows >>>>>>>>>>> +if not is_linux or not dpdk_conf.get('RTE_ARCH_64') >>>>>>>>>>> build = false >>>>>>>>>>> - reason = 'not supported on Windows' >>>>>>>>>>> + reason = 'only supported on 64-bit Linux' >>>>>>>>>>> subdir_done() >>>>>>>>>>> endif >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> 2.17.1 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] net/thunderx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux 2021-10-11 11:41 ` Ferruh Yigit @ 2021-10-11 11:44 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula @ 2021-10-11 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ferruh Yigit, Jerin Jacob Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran, Maciej Czekaj [C], dev, Bruce Richardson >-----Original Message----- >From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> >Sent: Monday, October 11, 2021 5:11 PM >To: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com> >Cc: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>; Jerin >Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>; Maciej Czekaj [C] ><mczekaj@marvell.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Bruce Richardson ><bruce.richardson@intel.com> >Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] net/thunderx: enable >build only on 64-bit Linux > >On 10/10/2021 10:38 AM, Jerin Jacob wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 9:00 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> >wrote: >>> >>> On 10/4/2021 1:54 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: >>>>> On 10/4/2021 1:01 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: >>>>>>> On 10/4/2021 12:34 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 10/4/2021 11:02 AM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 10/4/2021 6:56 AM, pbhagavatula@marvell.com >wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Due to Linux kernel AF(Admin function) driver >dependency, >>>>> only >>>>>>>>>>> enable >>>>>>>>>>>> build for 64-bit Linux. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Pavan, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Isn't it possible to provide a commit log in the kernel side >etc, >>>>> that >>>>>>> let >>>>>>>>>>> others to verify why only 64 bit is required, or if someone >want >>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>> support >>>>>>>>>>> 32bit that may help them to investigate the source of the >>>>>>> restriction. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Arch 32 support is not implemented on ThunderX, so 32bit >will >>>>> not >>>>>>>>> run. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I see, is following correct: >>>>>>>>> All thunderx, octeonx & octeontx2 only supports VF in the >DPDK, >>>>>>> and PF >>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>> supported by Linux kernel driver. And Linux kernel driver >doesn't >>>>>>>>> support arch32. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> AF != PF, AF is something that manages all the shared >resources >>>>>>> between PF/VF. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I see, I though AF is part of PF functionality. Are there two >different >>>>>>> kernel >>>>>>> modules for PF and AF? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So can DPDK driver drive PF? In a way, PF by DPDK, VF by DPDK, >AF >>>>> by >>>>>>> Linux >>>>>>> kernel driver. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yup that’s correct. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is something changed in kernel driver side to drop the 32bit >>>>> support? >>>>>>>>> If it was not supported at all, what is the motivation to >disable the >>>>>>> DPDK >>>>>>>>> drivers now? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It was never supported to begin with, motivation is that build >will >>>>> fail if >>>>>>> we try to >>>>>>>> compile with 32b. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If there is no plan to support 32bit in the kernel side, that is >>>>> reasonable >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> disable 32bit build, please provide above details in the commit >log. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And after above said, how much maintenance cost to support >32bit, >>>>> if >>>>>>> the build >>>>>>> error is on the logging format "%lx" etc .. (as we mostly have >32bit >>>>> build >>>>>>> errors), it is better to fix them using 'PRIx64' which is more >proper >>>>> way >>>>>>> anyway. If there is more logical issue with 32bit pointers, I >agree with >>>>>>> you to >>>>>>> disable it. >>>>>>> Can you please provided the build error in the commit log as >record? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Apologies, I meant that all the functions that don’t fall under 64b >are >>>>> stubbed out >>>>>> so the driver wouldn’t work. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> so is there build error or not? >>>>> >>>> >>>> No build error. >>>> >>> >>> Just trying to clarify, >>> >>> Linux kernel AF kernel driver only build for 64-bit Linux. >>> And mentioned DPDK drivers have a dependency to this kernel >module. >>> >>> But DPDK drivers are userspace application, can't 32-bit application >>> run on 64-bit Linux? >>> >>> Can you please clarify what exactly is not supported? >> >> >> armv8 specification has two operating modes, >> >> 1) AArch32 mode, where a 32 bit application can run on armv8 >> 2) AArch64 mode, where it is native 64bit support. >> >> In Thunderx and Octeon families, AArch32 mode is not implemented >to save >> the power and RTL cost. So it can never use AArch32 32bit mode. >> >> There was an attempt to emulate 32bit mode in 64 bit like X32_ABI, it >> is called IPL32 in arm64, that never became mainstream. So 32bit >application >> can not run on ThunderX/Octeontx so we would like to remove >building this option >> to avoid removing the cost of maintaining it. >> >> > >Thanks for the clarification, so main motivation is not the AF driver >dependency? > >Can you please put above description to the commit log in next version? Sure, I will send the next version. > >Thanks, >Ferruh Thanks, Pavan. > >> >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh ><pbhagavatula@marvell.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>> v5 Changes >>>>>>>>>>>> - s/fuction/function. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> v4 Changes: >>>>>>>>>>>> - Update commit message regarding dependency on >AF >>>>> driver. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build | 4 ++-- >>>>>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build >>>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build >>>>>>>>>>>> index 4bbcea7f93..da665bd76f 100644 >>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build >>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build >>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ >>>>>>>>>>>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause >>>>>>>>>>>> # Copyright(c) 2017 Cavium, Inc >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -if is_windows >>>>>>>>>>>> +if not is_linux or not dpdk_conf.get('RTE_ARCH_64') >>>>>>>>>>>> build = false >>>>>>>>>>>> - reason = 'not supported on Windows' >>>>>>>>>>>> + reason = 'only supported on 64-bit Linux' >>>>>>>>>>>> subdir_done() >>>>>>>>>>>> endif >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> 2.17.1 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-11 11:44 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-10-04 12:01 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] net/thunderx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula 2021-10-04 12:49 ` Ferruh Yigit 2021-10-04 12:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula 2021-10-08 15:30 ` Ferruh Yigit 2021-10-10 9:38 ` Jerin Jacob 2021-10-11 11:41 ` Ferruh Yigit 2021-10-11 11:44 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).