From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB722A0A02; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:01:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A677A40685; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:01:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-il1-f178.google.com (mail-il1-f178.google.com [209.85.166.178]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2AA4067B for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:01:18 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-il1-f178.google.com with SMTP id l5so4662760ilv.9 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 04:01:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Om5FgOK//Y3PlY9lW0s/FV2Xy29Tw3RS5vDe33n7LhY=; b=qnrMXgCJm/wjU5PqF/O+eiTzyuEUL+oz3WX7ZZt+F3ZMkJZwJj8j+ROXQkEzIzOdi8 G+EV5Eqs18I6fHwbtGgsVsoHn9cpf8ZLm2Io4pQlSQjIOCEQ00jR3l+rrhmAQMQalU3H kRZHax6NlCd4XyPMgKdWHEgtzvZhy8aNoWTcOt+NdVOFso8VU26QgnhgwJPVJZv0T7VU 631QJykWykeFtECzr7MhdA6GfLva9x/19qG5V1iDGtq0MDkCVhox06Bcgr6d1fvSXtC0 8x0eIpbCc3zTqCazhd11svDUx4Ipf8Ch1rlcDYuyfuHAMVutP3b3FfGIweJygOMJg7mV v8XA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Om5FgOK//Y3PlY9lW0s/FV2Xy29Tw3RS5vDe33n7LhY=; b=fQHOqPXWCI8kSLkTpKCSnl/VAwKvhaHTlEBw0qAstGF5c8/3vPglNW5Cyi2Ad83XGY y1prOGQpBB2pUNbjkth7SvvemtsP8xkAoQcCaGu1KvmIi14iCPzfkkKkICMQIMwSDgwj viBTJxhR+ZhYGQLo3y6vZrQ01NToNqB4YlOUR/zwUlVz+cOOItjwwb6/A9I4aERrC5Kf 4lYkcKuzGpLC8854XS64QjLfspClhxZZbCHh0UzUJJnKiBTxlm1cmqZ4Evk+CKYYdExV nThG8AYKwJoYMtHZ8PW3WZRqaqKtc4eMXkcD0jSGpCQoFEoaBXYJQpM9GzD6XDgSQdrX J6cw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Hwgii71Db3D79j/l0cU9pS33+7FxV3GxpiR5RHbYcgpClUzKU 5dRFizuf4GyDXnJ5en3AKrsO8c1BPsPSIiE6QX8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxcopLWwsNGmNL1CX8NfaKkc0+OzGffICSqyyfSSB9lgPT5kWLY/eeZx3t97ro1VgWVxq8UCVc5ZYRECN8vuyc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1a09:: with SMTP id s9mr8774130ild.60.1616756477936; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 04:01:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210316221857.2254-1-timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com> <20210316221857.2254-2-timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: Jerin Jacob Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 16:31:01 +0530 Message-ID: To: "McDaniel, Timothy" Cc: dpdk-dev , Jerin Jacob , "Van Haaren, Harry" , Ray Kinsella , Neil Horman , "Rao, Nikhil" , "Carrillo, Erik G" , "Gujjar, Abhinandan S" , Pavan Nikhilesh , Hemant Agrawal , "mattias.ronnblom" , "Mccarthy, Peter" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/25] event/dlb2: add dlb v2.5 probe X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 1:01 AM McDaniel, Timothy wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jerin Jacob > > Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 4:48 AM > > To: McDaniel, Timothy > > Cc: dpdk-dev ; Jerin Jacob ; Van Haaren, > > Harry ; Ray Kinsella ; Neil > > Horman ; Rao, Nikhil ; > > Carrillo, Erik G ; Gujjar, Abhinandan S > > ; Pavan Nikhilesh > > ; Hemant Agrawal ; > > mattias.ronnblom ; Mccarthy, Peter > > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/25] event/dlb2: add dlb v2.5 probe > > > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 3:49 AM Timothy McDaniel > > wrote: > > > > > > This commit adds dlb v2.5 probe support, and updates > > > parameter parsing. > > > > > > The dlb v2.5 device differs from dlb v2, in that the > > > number of resources (ports, queues, ...) is different, > > > so macros have been added to take the device version > > > into account. > > > > > > This commit also cleans up a few issues in the original > > > dlb2 source: > > > - eliminate duplicate constant definitions > > > - removed unused constant definitions > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Timothy McDaniel > > > --- > > > > > > > > -#define EVDEV_DLB2_NAME_PMD dlb2_event > > > +#define EVDEV_DLB2_NAME_PMD dlb_event > > > > Is this an intended change? why change the driver's name. > > Yes, This is an intentional change. We will be using the same driver name going forward, regardless of the hardware version. > Internally, we know which version of the hardware is present. Since the driver name is still driver/event/dlb2. Keep it as same prefix scheme with other drivers. > > Thanks, > Tim >