From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB83A0524;
	Sat, 20 Mar 2021 14:17:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5FB1410B7;
	Sat, 20 Mar 2021 14:17:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-il1-f175.google.com (mail-il1-f175.google.com
 [209.85.166.175])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C9F1410B6
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 14:17:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-il1-f175.google.com with SMTP id t14so754948ilu.3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 06:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=Fwln00riWAMCVkuRYlMiBUudjUS5cF0M8djkXP1/I7o=;
 b=NJosnwcCDrVYtnOrw1HX/NB2jAMw0CoVk/KECfrmkF00J1V+26dO35u1P2T60ikyBJ
 ijelraHtjBMBgQKxhKY7OurjkUhPW24OU1pbuWKWisgzH0r2fHfdx4ZuyJGKuwcXAXo3
 DasaFxINI8B2Ezt6xisVz1r4vjy40qAifO4M/zCwgmhChZNNrnblgz337lqPl9iFC7Vn
 SYWq4Bc6gNS5sKTM45HBF/fuQTFj663Dm3JboNlIwKBq6stUsyk+HpjhP46+jCkBLEa6
 eOgUUj1MRzV5+sfVbWWnyHYhKm054ir0+7ewfh9yBLEaJ7jW6m8Yjsmg9DIRAwKInmcC
 HpWQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=Fwln00riWAMCVkuRYlMiBUudjUS5cF0M8djkXP1/I7o=;
 b=iZvGaf2hS59HfWqgPoHc5dk85GmUN26U9qoZy+Tncvqn9RxZDWDnD44+zw1StV3dTh
 u8i5ymmnvvrjxDT5jKyW1InjTiLfNKQfLMWjj4T447A1FpCBnpRvqU89WggKiQkbAjCE
 e0ks/vHeM9/SgUAG994kQ9QgP7rw1C+WqXd7bsSittqrPaAvqHlQoo3NJi7EF67O3p1L
 ddOP1z4dEb/K3ZKIftpSXMjhFaip7+nSQ4LMfgyowbJr772guAOa9rsjWJ43QPMlEBIR
 /e/kAhuFfPJjOJyQMIEZO2I+ksl53X+KJkP6clm2N7BfBfNZKX3/NLc5q/4YOUh6L3c2
 EoUA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533/fh/frh01S4BleLwzmiI657uXQkEB80F4mmgrFSrCVtd65af8
 03Hqdbb9UKuSA+K7FHIAhJ09MGsWQTXdHSxXO+o=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyENlEHuwJBhlMF3rRc/dFApdnUBKdB87jQTUK6+HfqNSn8kkxsYCU3NezYvls4wp+Jo3T2nS++zT/9FY8Brvw=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:d28b:: with SMTP id p11mr2607618ilp.130.1616246225773; 
 Sat, 20 Mar 2021 06:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1614938727.git.bnemeth@redhat.com>
 <CALBAE1Pdrw3RTy+WVJaMgMAS64F8Ys-B+YEteWPwjvjLfk=geQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20ca527e-0a85-72ca-4bd0-9c129170262c@marvell.com>
In-Reply-To: <20ca527e-0a85-72ca-4bd0-9c129170262c@marvell.com>
From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 18:46:49 +0530
Message-ID: <CALBAE1NzQBWj8RLka37hFpTGMcy-yXUpr5XJgBDRBxLckrLZYg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@marvell.com>
Cc: Balazs Nemeth <bnemeth@redhat.com>, Rasesh Mody <rmody@marvell.com>, 
 Devendra Singh Rawat <dsinghrawat@marvell.com>, dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH 0/8] Optimize qede use of
 rx/tx_entries
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 12:13 PM Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@marvell.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 6:44 PM Balazs Nemeth <bnemeth@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> This patch set optimizes qede_{rx,tx}_entry and introduces
> >> rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk in qede_process_tx_compl. The overall performance
> >> improvement depends on the use-case; in a physical-virtual-physical test
> >> on a ThunderX2 99xx system with two SMT threads used in ovs,
> >> and two cores used in a vm, an improvement of around 2.55% is observed
> >> due to this patch set.
>
> Hi Balazs, thanks for posting, quickly reviewed it, looks reasonable.

Waiting for the review/ack to merge this series

> Doing a detailed review.
>
> > Cc: rmody@marvell.com
> > Cc: shshaikh@marvell.com>
> > Hi Rasesh, Shahed
> > Could you review this series from Balazs?
>
> Shahed is not within marvell, adding Devendra from our DPKD support team.
>
> Igor