DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
To: Robin Jarry <rjarry@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	 Kiran Kumar K <kirankumark@marvell.com>,
	Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>,
	 Zhirun Yan <yanzhirun_163@163.com>,
	Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] graph: expose node context as pointers
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:29:44 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALBAE1O1gMgXV5CWPno1jnsNk6mx+UaFSRiUxTazvATL8_q7kw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240325100500.694748-2-rjarry@redhat.com>

On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 3:35 PM Robin Jarry <rjarry@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> In some cases, the node context data is used to store two pointers
> because the data is larger than the reserved 16 bytes. Having to define
> intermediate structures just to be able to cast is tedious. Add two
> pointers that take the same space than ctx.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Jarry <rjarry@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
>     v3:
>
>     * Added __extension__ to the unnamed struct inside the union.
>     * Fixed C++ header checks.
>     * Replaced alignas() with an explicit static_assert.
>
>     v2:
>
>     * Added __extension__ (not sure where it is needed, I don't have access to windows).
>     * It still fails the header check for C++. It seems not possible to align an unnamed union...
>       Tyler, do you have an idea about how to fix that?
>     * Added static_assert to ensure the anonymous union is not larger than RTE_NODE_CTX_SZ.
>
>  lib/graph/rte_graph_worker_common.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/graph/rte_graph_worker_common.h b/lib/graph/rte_graph_worker_common.h
> index 36d864e2c14e..722e9dac0d36 100644
> --- a/lib/graph/rte_graph_worker_common.h
> +++ b/lib/graph/rte_graph_worker_common.h
> @@ -12,7 +12,9 @@
>   * process, enqueue and move streams of objects to the next nodes.
>   */
>
> +#include <assert.h>
>  #include <stdalign.h>
> +#include <stddef.h>
>
>  #include <rte_common.h>
>  #include <rte_cycles.h>
> @@ -112,7 +114,19 @@ struct __rte_cache_aligned rte_node {
>         };
>         /* Fast path area  */
>  #define RTE_NODE_CTX_SZ 16
> -       alignas(RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE) uint8_t ctx[RTE_NODE_CTX_SZ]; /**< Node Context. */
> +       /*
> +        * alignas(RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE) cannot be used for ctx since it is part of an unnamed union.
> +        * The compiler shifts the next field on the next cache line which is not what we want.
> +        * The alignment is enforced via a explcicit static asserts below.
> +        */
> +       union {
> +               uint8_t ctx[RTE_NODE_CTX_SZ];
> +               /* Convenience aliases to store pointers without complex casting. */
> +               __extension__ struct {
> +                       void *ctx_ptr;
> +                       void *ctx_ptr2;
> +               };
> +       }; /**< Node Context. */
>         uint16_t size;          /**< Total number of objects available. */
>         uint16_t idx;           /**< Number of objects used. */
>         rte_graph_off_t off;    /**< Offset of node in the graph reel. */
> @@ -130,6 +144,11 @@ struct __rte_cache_aligned rte_node {
>         alignas(RTE_CACHE_LINE_MIN_SIZE) struct rte_node *nodes[]; /**< Next nodes. */
>  };
>
> +static_assert(offsetof(struct rte_node, ctx) % RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE == 0,
> +       "rte_node ctx must be aligned on a cache line");


This will fail in 32bit machine.
https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2024-March/623806.html

I can think of following solution to add before ctx.
RTE_MARKER fastpath __rte_cache__aligned;


> +static_assert(offsetof(struct rte_node, size) - offsetof(struct rte_node, ctx) == RTE_NODE_CTX_SZ,
> +       "rte_node context union cannot be larger than RTE_NODE_CTX_SZ");
> +
>  /**
>   * @internal
>   *
> --
> 2.44.0
>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-25 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-25 10:05 Robin Jarry
2024-03-25 10:59 ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2024-03-25 11:02   ` Robin Jarry
2024-03-25 11:08     ` Jerin Jacob
2024-03-25 11:15       ` Robin Jarry
2024-03-25 11:35         ` Jerin Jacob
2024-03-25 12:07           ` Bruce Richardson
2024-03-25 12:08           ` David Marchand
2024-03-25 15:20           ` Robin Jarry
2024-03-25 15:47             ` Jerin Jacob
2024-03-25 15:51               ` Robin Jarry
2024-03-25 15:56                 ` Jerin Jacob
2024-03-25 16:31 ` [PATCH v4] " Robin Jarry
2024-03-25 16:50   ` Jerin Jacob
2024-03-27  9:14 ` [PATCH v5] " Robin Jarry
2024-05-29 17:54   ` Nithin Dabilpuram
2024-06-18 12:33   ` David Marchand
2024-06-25 15:22     ` Robin Jarry
2024-06-26 11:30       ` Jerin Jacob

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALBAE1O1gMgXV5CWPno1jnsNk6mx+UaFSRiUxTazvATL8_q7kw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=kirankumark@marvell.com \
    --cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
    --cc=rjarry@redhat.com \
    --cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=yanzhirun_163@163.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).