DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
To: Marat Khalili <marat.khalili@huawei.com>
Cc: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>,
	 Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] bpf: fix signed shift overflows in ARM JIT
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 22:01:13 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALBAE1OW-zbiJKQOgTOeEyE6R6CtGAfF__okaEypWMkt7hBENA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e99e848a439e46c4bf9092c2c83de2a8@huawei.com>

On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 3:40 PM Marat Khalili <marat.khalili@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 9:01 PM Marat Khalili <marat.khalili@huawei.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Left shifts of integer literals and bool values overwriting the sign bit
> > > were used multiple times in bpf_jit_arm64.c. E.g.:
> > >
> > >     insn = (!!is64) << 31;
> > >
> > > where is64 has type bool (double bang is a no-op here). The operand of
> > > left shift was promoted to type int, which when 32-bit wide cannot
> > > represent the result. Similarly literal integers have int type by
> > > default.  Sanitizer produced the following diagnostic during runtime
> > > (for various lines):
> > >
> > >     lib/bpf/bpf_jit_arm64.c:241:18: runtime error: left shift of 1 by 31
> > >     places cannot be represented in type 'int'
> >
> > Wonder why none of the tests in app/test/test_bpf.c able to catch
> > this? The generated ARM opcode looks OK (otherwise tests wont pass).
> > Could you check what is missing in the app/test/test_bpf.c?
>
> That tests do trigger it.
>
> RTE>>bpf_autotest
> ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_arm64.c:320:18: runtime error: left shift of 1 by 31 places cannot be represented in type 'int'

This is when ASAN is enabled. Right? Is it really generating BAD
opcode(i.e emiter generating bad OPcode) and test fails?


>     #0 0x22bf59c in mov_imm ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_arm64.c:320
>     #1 0x22bfae0 in emit_mov_imm ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_arm64.c:378
>     #2 0x22c3bfc in emit ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_arm64.c:1321
>     #3 0x22c4314 in __rte_bpf_jit_arm64 ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_arm64.c:1414
>     #4 0x22775c0 in __rte_bpf_jit ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf.c:44
>     #5 0x228fbdc in rte_bpf_load ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf_load.c:115
>     #6 0x6312f8 in run_test ../../src/app/test/test_bpf.c:3225
>     #7 0x631848 in test_bpf ../../src/app/test/test_bpf.c:3269
> [...]
>
> RTE>>bpf_convert_autotest
> ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_arm64.c:241:18: runtime error: left shift of 1 by 31 places cannot be represented in type 'int'
>     #0 0x22bf04c in emit_add_sub_imm ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_arm64.c:241
>     #1 0x22bf270 in emit_mov ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_arm64.c:267
>     #2 0x22bf2a4 in emit_mov_64 ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_arm64.c:273
>     #3 0x22c1a68 in emit_prologue_no_call ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_arm64.c:884
>     #4 0x22c1c9c in emit_prologue ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_arm64.c:904
>     #5 0x22c327c in emit ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_arm64.c:1136
>     #6 0x22c4314 in __rte_bpf_jit_arm64 ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_arm64.c:1414
>     #7 0x22775c0 in __rte_bpf_jit ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf.c:44
>     #8 0x228fbdc in rte_bpf_load ../../src/lib/bpf/bpf_load.c:115
>     #9 0x631e7c in test_bpf_match ../../src/app/test/test_bpf.c:3328
>     #10 0x632ce8 in test_bpf_filter_sanity ../../src/app/test/test_bpf.c:3376
>     #11 0x6331c4 in test_bpf_convert ../../src/app/test/test_bpf.c:3487
> [...]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-11 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-10 15:30 [PATCH 0/3] bpf: simple tests and fixes Marat Khalili
2025-11-10 15:30 ` [PATCH 1/3] bpf: fix signed shift overflows in ARM JIT Marat Khalili
2025-11-11  6:25   ` Jerin Jacob
2025-11-11  7:53     ` Morten Brørup
2025-11-11 10:10     ` Marat Khalili
2025-11-11 16:29       ` Jerin Jacob
2025-11-11 16:31       ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2025-11-11 16:39         ` Marat Khalili
2025-11-12  5:23           ` Jerin Jacob
2025-11-10 15:30 ` [PATCH 2/3] bpf: disallow empty program Marat Khalili
2025-11-10 16:40   ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-10 16:46     ` Marat Khalili
2025-11-10 15:30 ` [PATCH 3/3] bpf: make add/subtract one program validate Marat Khalili

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALBAE1OW-zbiJKQOgTOeEyE6R6CtGAfF__okaEypWMkt7hBENA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
    --cc=marat.khalili@huawei.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).