From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD964A2EEB for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:34:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9FE1E9CE; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:34:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-io1-f65.google.com (mail-io1-f65.google.com [209.85.166.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3AC91E933; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:34:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-io1-f65.google.com with SMTP id d17so32138392ios.13; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 05:34:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=URHQtOTshW/wr9HlVZacwA1W8+b9Mpuk34EUFpa4clg=; b=AHkt0ek9uxx4gE6D18Qrw85WSiOjGA0ihwibm/g6cdgGpywWtqSqrtjjzo4aJ6Ymft NuS9Uuu5whc3pYFNAhy5U08SDC6HNTKhyvfsthCh/VHgSsLnUgt/zkCS6nOQ8CSrnhWs CQJ7MqPjy0fqnw3M7zJb2eXUdfG6s+3GieNC38+dwTTpR6i8r32qeCInBLvSGUb7vb+N E/VnZqW54GibU54Qudg8ulPE/vI6cEpBdRSx+766Kk0ySFGK37EsjYv9l8LWKNSf0zxQ puYdbHwtj4ouZKeLRtOyZyGE2er182yRkzqexMD2v5lkEuKggQEYdRl5QHhjsvKppz7n 4QHA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=URHQtOTshW/wr9HlVZacwA1W8+b9Mpuk34EUFpa4clg=; b=HFW4Tz9+FlArquIg3NElCyN+pq1kVHYtt20BazQ70ifqk9nFvYPwZVNpKGpQT772QD kQNYSQrrzLyx5mK4ZkyrCkbOLZnp9HCWxLtdeN5VEeEiYrp87kwkxUWcqFKnbjTDfupP HUKwgISv+bn61CdyIz+jHAdn/RiuRObOfDzVeQdMAYfPS7WNjyq+BZowgjQJeznZyiOv C/y9732vgllf6lKGIy3Y/300Ft3P6Sky072M7Y0pVvXNE+KTdfxxeaMgFHQLkIhSdZgg eadjpjGdR2IpTOsBX6w/sOJXADQaUfk4T24dpYzBoV9icpRt1I+WJZsWb7yMHw6TzpsP 6uiA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVaIfCTuXoFz6hneZoN3xGp1gUnjRwweSy3f5TxMOIWpoFSYR2T 455J0iNHrfrpVh0XpA4iyvVlRUBlJ+ewrKdj2/R6th7rShwoyg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqycZl/AmAtJlsyrG+zKuctEKG4ix0AQJ0hMKSCKaLLNI5BFPi9ebRy1F96J3+UKsC7ui59IePCl2iuM4RdFDjI= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9714:: with SMTP id h20mr4501521iol.294.1568291676811; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 05:34:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190906073217.13873-1-shshaikh@marvell.com> <20190906073217.13873-2-shshaikh@marvell.com> In-Reply-To: <20190906073217.13873-2-shshaikh@marvell.com> From: Jerin Jacob Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 18:04:25 +0530 Message-ID: To: Shahed Shaikh Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Rasesh Mody , Jerin Jacob , GR-Everest-DPDK-Dev@marvell.com, stable@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/5] net/qede: refactor Rx and Tx queue setup X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 1:10 PM Shahed Shaikh wrote: > > This patch refactors Rx and Tx queue setup flow required to allow > odd number of queues to be configured in next patch. > > This is the first patch of the series required to fix an issue > where qede port initialization in ovs-dpdk fails due to 1 Rx/Tx queue > configuration. Detailed explaination is given in next patch. > > Fixes: 2af14ca79c0a ("net/qede: support 100G") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Shahed Shaikh > --- This series looks good to me. Looks like there is genuine compilation issue from qede driver. http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2019-September/096256.html Please confirm in either case.