From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2209BA3201
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 15:57:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF243256;
	Sun, 20 Oct 2019 15:57:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-il1-f195.google.com (mail-il1-f195.google.com
 [209.85.166.195]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FDC02C2B
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 15:57:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-il1-f195.google.com with SMTP id y5so9606747ilb.5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 06:57:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=3rduo4AJym8SeQxT5fmj3jHxEtv+nqvv37zK6SXzjO0=;
 b=sOwVA1ZRRXdYKqMmAAS9h3Pha7+UKpMnJmabsc0ubhk7He99j2K3cujK6LLGswWvjj
 Cuz2sj5AnrpRq89bKhYrJYuMhreE6PevShAmWv9GHwIuKktMcD3XU3diKsJYyPoCv8Xr
 dnlBsbscy10jG3m4oSPYShnFl0zISlF2APMNT5tJAIl/2btrJJIAWXS6se3YyD7Vk9ah
 5bI4skUIe5fl3NMvK6dqQN+FsDsyQUFm1hCdSP6ow4Vb+CG7IoSRwv097Sy6seexPtzb
 VaEJs93wyNpJB+ilGl+fQmblkpG0c/gMVB00YO4hTwfsW270sfEC7YhDkIAuv9pcrrLO
 rsZw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=3rduo4AJym8SeQxT5fmj3jHxEtv+nqvv37zK6SXzjO0=;
 b=tyXh2pXV+g8moqnb7Q7L3GiwmDSwVPSJ+MH6bi4+xaReqfB7IbwODZfopypWFNrs4U
 qq3h9gX6qQiD1W83TM7OqoP+vuGXgi79ip6yQGVrH6P4B+qqpT3/v4aG3h3F3JsR40ew
 x4jDe82xuCgj0kHshg6g3umNrMR+fyuD1uOa345nnvkrs2UMxN5GsnJDeDCbafd561wN
 6vAXpnSR9VKsNYUB0b5g3NjVnA4W98pEiXfs97iFkEpZhPDfSaJgHAIi39KrfADQiRUN
 KOjprPtvoafJJomhVIcvREtrBzX1t30nPGRruN+9pvPd3EPCwq54Z/RPs88wuUgHSROR
 M7fw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWveOiv1/tfO+M1PkEka82zs3z491F2Dg9npI/Dfj22X+kKM/Cl
 WcewKvvsEsDiLxkiKILmnhodEALm2ZKuGxJalxo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxIQ9R9LukUFJNmGNBOn55QSEevIF+DPkG/5Q/5wv4vPgi7cUQW5XL7B/v2cds1ql0F6gzA1Ehg1dtBOxXr+D8=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:aa48:: with SMTP id j69mr1986670ili.162.1571579824561; 
 Sun, 20 Oct 2019 06:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20191019045657.399-1-kirankumark@marvell.com>
 <20191020045208.25069-1-kirankumark@marvell.com>
In-Reply-To: <20191020045208.25069-1-kirankumark@marvell.com>
From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 19:26:48 +0530
Message-ID: <CALBAE1PFSekbqVi72Mhz5RvVbOq4iObAfULNgbzpLbtXTPSU_w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kiran Kumar K <kirankumark@marvell.com>
Cc: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>,
 Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>, Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
 Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>, 
 John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
 Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>, 
 Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, 
 Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
 Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>, 
 dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] ethdev: add HIGIG2 key field to flow API
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 10:22 AM <kirankumark@marvell.com> wrote:
>
> From: Kiran Kumar K <kirankumark@marvell.com>
>
> Add new rte_flow_item_higig2_hdr in order to match higig2 header.
> It is a layer 2.5 protocol and used in Broadcom switches.
> Header format is based on the following document.
> http://read.pudn.com/downloads558/doc/comm/2301468/HiGig_protocol.pdf
>
> Signed-off-by: Kiran Kumar K <kirankumark@marvell.com>
> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>

The old 4.8.5 compiler doesn't like "opcode" under two structures with
the anonymous union.

http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2019-October/103432.html

Probably one can change to "opc" or something like that.

With 4.8.5 compiler fix,
Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>