DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
To: "Kinsella, Ray" <mdr@ashroe.eu>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>,
	 Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>, dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>,
	 Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>,
	David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/7] common/octeontx: enable build only on 64bit Linux
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 18:28:41 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALBAE1P_znQGD7YzM5Tww-2nRrkRdc5zh7aFUkaOjPHVdpf84w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0564d636-3088-9b3e-1226-2767996d7f2a@ashroe.eu>

On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 6:17 PM Kinsella, Ray <mdr@ashroe.eu> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 25/03/2021 12:46, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 4:33 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> 25/03/2021 11:58, Kinsella, Ray:
> >>> On 25/03/2021 10:46, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>>> 25/03/2021 11:42, Thomas Monjalon:
> >>>>> 24/03/2021 11:55, Jerin Jacob:
> >>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:33 PM <pbhagavatula@marvell.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Due to Linux kernel dependency, only enable build for 64bit Linux.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Series Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I've reorganized the commits per family of drivers,
> >>>>> so it makes more sense than grouping per driver class
> >>>>> with "common/octeontx" for title for all:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> net/thunderx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux
> >>>>> common/octeontx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux
> >>>>> common/octeontx2: enable build only on 64-bit Linux
> >>>>>
> >>>>> and applied.
> >>>>
> >>>> Actually not applied yet.
> >>>> I'm not sure what to do for the ABI check which is broken
> >>>> because some drivers are not compiled anymore in 32-bit build.
> >>>> I've workarounded locally by removing the dump files in the reference build.
> >>>> Should we add an exception in libabigail.abignore?
> >>>>
> >>> In the past we said that depreciating HW support would be considered to be same as an ABI Breakage.
> >>>
> >>> From the policy ...
> >>> "Updates to the minimum hardware requirements, which drop support for hardware which was previously supported, should be treated as an ABI change."
> >>
> >> So the patches should wait 21.11.
> >> Everybody agree?
> >
> > Looks good to me to postpone.
> >
> > @Ray Kinsella @Thomas Monjalon  @McDaniel, Timothy @David Marchand @Neil Horman
> >
> > Currently, I merged DLB v1 driver removal patch to next-eventdev. Is
> > this ABI breakge[1]?
> >
> > http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210316210812.15614-1-timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com/
> >
> > [1]
> > From the policy ...
> > "Updates to the minimum hardware requirements, which drop support for
> > hardware which was previously supported, should be treated as an ABI
> > change."
>
> +1

Is +1 for not to remove the dlb driver or remove it?

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-25 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-25 17:02 pbhagavatula
2021-02-25 17:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/7] mempool/octeontx: " pbhagavatula
2021-02-25 17:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] net/octeontx: " pbhagavatula
2021-02-25 17:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/7] crypto/octeontx: " pbhagavatula
2021-02-25 17:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/7] event/octeontx: " pbhagavatula
2021-02-25 17:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/7] raw/octeontx2: enable build only for " pbhagavatula
2021-03-22 15:14   ` Radha Mohan
2021-02-25 17:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/7] compress/octeontx: " pbhagavatula
2021-02-26  5:52   ` Ashish Gupta
2021-03-24 10:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/7] common/octeontx: enable build only on " Jerin Jacob
2021-03-25 10:42   ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-25 10:46     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-25 10:58       ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-03-25 11:03         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-25 12:46           ` Jerin Jacob
2021-03-25 12:47             ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-03-25 12:58               ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2021-03-25 13:02                 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-03-26 10:50                   ` Jerin Jacob
2021-03-25 14:57             ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-25 15:01               ` David Marchand
2021-03-25 14:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 v2 0/3] octeontx build only on 64-bit Linux Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-25 14:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 v2 1/3] net/thunderx: enable " Thomas Monjalon
2021-08-23 19:54     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " pbhagavatula
2021-08-23 19:54       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] common/octeontx: " pbhagavatula
2021-08-23 19:54       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] common/octeontx2: " pbhagavatula
2021-09-07 12:14       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] net/thunderx: " Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-03 20:36       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " pbhagavatula
2021-10-03 20:36         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] common/octeontx: " pbhagavatula
2021-10-03 20:36         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] common/octeontx2: " pbhagavatula
2021-10-04  5:56         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] net/thunderx: " pbhagavatula
2021-10-04  5:56           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] common/octeontx: " pbhagavatula
2021-10-04  5:56           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] common/octeontx2: " pbhagavatula
2021-10-04  9:05           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] net/thunderx: " Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-14 19:56           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 " pbhagavatula
2021-10-14 19:56             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] common/octeontx: " pbhagavatula
2021-10-18  7:03               ` Harman Kalra
2021-10-14 19:56             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/3] common/octeontx2: " pbhagavatula
2021-10-15 10:39             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] net/thunderx: " Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-15 13:58               ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2021-10-15 16:32                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-15 17:16             ` [dpdk-dev] " Ferruh Yigit
2021-03-25 14:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 v2 2/3] common/octeontx: " Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-25 14:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 v2 3/3] common/octeontx2: " Thomas Monjalon
2021-08-17  8:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 v2 0/3] octeontx " David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALBAE1P_znQGD7YzM5Tww-2nRrkRdc5zh7aFUkaOjPHVdpf84w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hkalra@marvell.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
    --cc=pbhagavatula@marvell.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).