From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
To: "Kinsella, Ray" <mdr@ashroe.eu>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>,
Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>, dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>,
Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>,
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/7] common/octeontx: enable build only on 64bit Linux
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 18:28:41 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALBAE1P_znQGD7YzM5Tww-2nRrkRdc5zh7aFUkaOjPHVdpf84w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0564d636-3088-9b3e-1226-2767996d7f2a@ashroe.eu>
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 6:17 PM Kinsella, Ray <mdr@ashroe.eu> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 25/03/2021 12:46, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 4:33 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> 25/03/2021 11:58, Kinsella, Ray:
> >>> On 25/03/2021 10:46, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>>> 25/03/2021 11:42, Thomas Monjalon:
> >>>>> 24/03/2021 11:55, Jerin Jacob:
> >>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:33 PM <pbhagavatula@marvell.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Due to Linux kernel dependency, only enable build for 64bit Linux.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Series Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I've reorganized the commits per family of drivers,
> >>>>> so it makes more sense than grouping per driver class
> >>>>> with "common/octeontx" for title for all:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> net/thunderx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux
> >>>>> common/octeontx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux
> >>>>> common/octeontx2: enable build only on 64-bit Linux
> >>>>>
> >>>>> and applied.
> >>>>
> >>>> Actually not applied yet.
> >>>> I'm not sure what to do for the ABI check which is broken
> >>>> because some drivers are not compiled anymore in 32-bit build.
> >>>> I've workarounded locally by removing the dump files in the reference build.
> >>>> Should we add an exception in libabigail.abignore?
> >>>>
> >>> In the past we said that depreciating HW support would be considered to be same as an ABI Breakage.
> >>>
> >>> From the policy ...
> >>> "Updates to the minimum hardware requirements, which drop support for hardware which was previously supported, should be treated as an ABI change."
> >>
> >> So the patches should wait 21.11.
> >> Everybody agree?
> >
> > Looks good to me to postpone.
> >
> > @Ray Kinsella @Thomas Monjalon @McDaniel, Timothy @David Marchand @Neil Horman
> >
> > Currently, I merged DLB v1 driver removal patch to next-eventdev. Is
> > this ABI breakge[1]?
> >
> > http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210316210812.15614-1-timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com/
> >
> > [1]
> > From the policy ...
> > "Updates to the minimum hardware requirements, which drop support for
> > hardware which was previously supported, should be treated as an ABI
> > change."
>
> +1
Is +1 for not to remove the dlb driver or remove it?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-25 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-25 17:02 pbhagavatula
2021-02-25 17:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/7] mempool/octeontx: " pbhagavatula
2021-02-25 17:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] net/octeontx: " pbhagavatula
2021-02-25 17:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/7] crypto/octeontx: " pbhagavatula
2021-02-25 17:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/7] event/octeontx: " pbhagavatula
2021-02-25 17:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/7] raw/octeontx2: enable build only for " pbhagavatula
2021-03-22 15:14 ` Radha Mohan
2021-02-25 17:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/7] compress/octeontx: " pbhagavatula
2021-02-26 5:52 ` Ashish Gupta
2021-03-24 10:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/7] common/octeontx: enable build only on " Jerin Jacob
2021-03-25 10:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-25 10:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-25 10:58 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-03-25 11:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-25 12:46 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-03-25 12:47 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-03-25 12:58 ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2021-03-25 13:02 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-03-26 10:50 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-03-25 14:57 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-25 15:01 ` David Marchand
2021-03-25 14:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 v2 0/3] octeontx build only on 64-bit Linux Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-25 14:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 v2 1/3] net/thunderx: enable " Thomas Monjalon
2021-08-23 19:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " pbhagavatula
2021-08-23 19:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] common/octeontx: " pbhagavatula
2021-08-23 19:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] common/octeontx2: " pbhagavatula
2021-09-07 12:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] net/thunderx: " Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-03 20:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " pbhagavatula
2021-10-03 20:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] common/octeontx: " pbhagavatula
2021-10-03 20:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] common/octeontx2: " pbhagavatula
2021-10-04 5:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] net/thunderx: " pbhagavatula
2021-10-04 5:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] common/octeontx: " pbhagavatula
2021-10-04 5:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] common/octeontx2: " pbhagavatula
2021-10-04 9:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] net/thunderx: " Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-14 19:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 " pbhagavatula
2021-10-14 19:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] common/octeontx: " pbhagavatula
2021-10-18 7:03 ` Harman Kalra
2021-10-14 19:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/3] common/octeontx2: " pbhagavatula
2021-10-15 10:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] net/thunderx: " Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-15 13:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2021-10-15 16:32 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-15 17:16 ` [dpdk-dev] " Ferruh Yigit
2021-03-25 14:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 v2 2/3] common/octeontx: " Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-25 14:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 v2 3/3] common/octeontx2: " Thomas Monjalon
2021-08-17 8:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 v2 0/3] octeontx " David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALBAE1P_znQGD7YzM5Tww-2nRrkRdc5zh7aFUkaOjPHVdpf84w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hkalra@marvell.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
--cc=pbhagavatula@marvell.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).