From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECCEA04B3; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 07:01:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC191C065; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 07:01:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-io1-f66.google.com (mail-io1-f66.google.com [209.85.166.66]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F2B1C011 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 07:01:11 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-io1-f66.google.com with SMTP id e7so12918131iof.11 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 22:01:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=StU6iQib94oeUbcqcRFotXwd7TiiRkxnh6PXTLLRWf8=; b=XOTX6UkWV4JrKSNi4/vK5ZmRxBJCTrmqC8B4DwNn1nHLytvmXkd/TmnbVDj2ewT/OQ eLYI6wShzvfcGHRGUFM8vQPMtShxuJJjdtC3SA2MXCH5Q3jYifRhoTlBIN1YDj3cRndu Y7PvT6wq/0rx8owGu0p0uqHzZxrFVZycU0U6lEQu3zysFlEeC/becqyPt40dQvxxfaI+ eT0YSa11WIfwtxeF8jIa9Ywut7r0xPE3SpdBb309ueO0JtojUVybJ8dHmDYQgnVq6Y4s akltgBdQGC1QaYR9ysGo1IuG1/Sh2GAy8FOFoVO5PvZvzpIvjLyyp3ehf/+r26WVOG2c 9atQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=StU6iQib94oeUbcqcRFotXwd7TiiRkxnh6PXTLLRWf8=; b=noCPtOLiPSEgicFIdgF2DWe1mKgNr6rSyDWMJBD3tozcV8g+rdv5Fe6WuD1Z0wU2Nc EOVAvSHFw+vmkUQpKJi4o/5b85ahfsDD4AMPZWTb1TXRwi5upKiDdF22qIqNOUzj4k5W XCORcaGdjm0FU3tdyIAQeoWnLfxFMRekPTlw3ysFwagUUjQYtYUYgxgg3Tn635mHfC92 9dLhbclLQw1YOWRrW0HYyPgTxeQHOBKveqIsZ+MGgmH70NmSOOZ30UkzT0Pq2s0xGF+S O73f3XLPxoYONXUx8EQVextbwWqlj2TsGoLMQb6a3ZkeVV9QkQbMxVZ6xdC4PAXA9Eqp dBmA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXDxoVr6LXoewswRl+qVAX6vU+Fv9Mdc6opm5GBWYeuWnYvqL5D MRG65ToeF92iv7rpywm7TfFL8DDupulLiBieypM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyLz1z9ybIgpfzR+wu1574xskZwTs9t8AdRUjcE9Ma0o7uEngLwmFpYD3PhgJ019gA/yoXkFH2m30R+Z3ya+Es= X-Received: by 2002:a02:7715:: with SMTP id g21mr15501542jac.104.1580191270774; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 22:01:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200120150300.15407-1-mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: From: Jerin Jacob Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:30:54 +0530 Message-ID: To: Honnappa Nagarahalli Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Mattias_R=C3=B6nnblom?= , "jerinj@marvell.com" , "dev@dpdk.org" , nd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] event/dsw: use custom element size ring for control X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 10:36 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote: > > > > > Subject: [PATCH] event/dsw: use custom element size ring for control > > > > Replace DSW's use of regular DPDK rings (and code for packing/unpacking > > control messages into void pointers) with custom size rings. > > > > In addition to cleaner code, this change allows DSW to support up to th= e > > eventdev API's maximum of 255 ports by tweaking DSW_MAX_PORTS. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mattias R=C3=B6nnblom > > + > > +# Depends on rte_ring_elem_*() > > +allow_experimental_apis =3D true > The rte_ring_elem_xxx API changes look good. > > Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli Applied to dpdk-next-eventdev/master. Thanks. > > > -- > > 2.17.1 >