From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85AD1A04C0; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 07:59:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910C01D5D3; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 07:59:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-io1-f68.google.com (mail-io1-f68.google.com [209.85.166.68]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC5C1D5CF for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 07:59:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-io1-f68.google.com with SMTP id r25so9832940ioj.0 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 22:59:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iNbnM0XVNE7ThWlmtqwNW8Hhyv/Symh6MsxS1gIV8jw=; b=d2L9joAnfqINfI6IKHGkoJPD2Fo/pa79E8bCwBcjXWTmbJVIyNCnMAlRzXKTQJhWbu s3k+N6HQm8R+X96V594gc0ZFm3lJyK/WwWMF+UACX1xyziaaAdvyqwt9HLElaE03FSWC oIqrP2GlWWSrW3kJrgZOr075nSULfoxDeyEGy8wyhExnPtgJNzQmJqNSHVw9fi0C2MYo DnhEsxT6NQnM3q6QJn7GilQmk4Dy7CyXW9LiVS/iPVgaot8h4o1jG7t66E1gNM/TvBKh 60uLyH7opLgEq+2+zYh4qJ/1YzGUDsDUqnSlp9X8UD3Z/Jeg3m/rT53zT3TdJDedBNKE 9Mgw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iNbnM0XVNE7ThWlmtqwNW8Hhyv/Symh6MsxS1gIV8jw=; b=MkLL8ntPky/miyW5d5o8o96vkuIybcrxhlq0pRMLkmDbUYD68rwA4YYSWLZt8zeimF d8kjgB8D4431gK74UTcIUYFtlt2UrOcG4mZzidQP/BO//5fJscYVPbgwyZZpS6A1Jl8o ZieLhNxVDFCXFdeJCXKoBXIgIWa/BuC0eKCvM+6xCaDpOXP3Jc0AXmBQ4mDTrIQ05LQ1 mtIT0/w6FLd5qxqecM1poacaZ3wdaIzeb0siiwp6CmDAOW6W9OHOuRNZ92HNDabv4obO e0VJvmCPd6xnTiXks8LWX4P/aqe9kwUfBS4gHsVVRhlFx0lzpLgx4SoyIwsWrr44fjS6 KPqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Jz+KsUsDxll9R+YnN1sDxwWur98+BWo/52bBAdwBE9EmTq0nT 6DPbcrXWZFPoPAC1HPA6/otIvY0U7sQ1DI+jICs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+sWMUj+YtxEWcR4a2a5cVqeyZmEmIlyn4VgPTJDBKXT/ldre18dNOVAIblOrQd3xyfn5RQOJbBCiIzKHtrKo= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:9916:: with SMTP id t22mr5986399ioj.163.1601272768562; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 22:59:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1599843507-19970-1-git-send-email-timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com> <1599843507-19970-3-git-send-email-timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1599843507-19970-3-git-send-email-timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com> From: Jerin Jacob Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 11:29:12 +0530 Message-ID: To: Timothy McDaniel Cc: Jerin Jacob , =?UTF-8?Q?Mattias_R=C3=B6nnblom?= , Liang Ma , Peter Mccarthy , Nipun Gupta , Pavan Nikhilesh , dpdk-dev , Erik Gabriel Carrillo , Gage Eads , "Van Haaren, Harry" , Hemant Agrawal , "Richardson, Bruce" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] eventdev: update app and examples for new eventdev ABI X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 10:32 PM Timothy McDaniel wrote: > > Several data structures and constants changed, or were added, > in the previous patch. This commit updates the dependent > apps and examples to use the new ABI. > > Signed-off-by: Timothy McDaniel > --- > app/test-eventdev/evt_common.h | 11 ++++++++ > app/test-eventdev/test_order_atq.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++----- > app/test-eventdev/test_order_common.c | 1 + > app/test-eventdev/test_order_queue.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++----- > app/test/test_eventdev.c | 4 +-- > .../eventdev_pipeline/pipeline_worker_generic.c | 6 +++-- > examples/eventdev_pipeline/pipeline_worker_tx.c | 1 + > examples/l2fwd-event/l2fwd_event_generic.c | 7 +++-- > examples/l2fwd-event/l2fwd_event_internal_port.c | 6 +++-- > examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_event_generic.c | 7 +++-- > examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_event_internal_port.c | 6 +++-- > 11 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) # Please fix the build issues http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-September/152506.html # Could you share the performance difference between with/without change with SW PMD on x86? This is to make sure the "constant based" template scheme is working as expected for testeventdev, l2fwd-event and l3fwd # One core with 64B packet case numbers delta is enough.