From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31439A0526; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:09:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B2B1BFD4; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:09:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-io1-f65.google.com (mail-io1-f65.google.com [209.85.166.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF23199BC; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:09:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-io1-f65.google.com with SMTP id v6so1795133iob.4; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 02:09:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=exx549mZ4wZOuIYlwAsfFQ2NeFKjTPKmMjh6ey7W1ok=; b=RnFxGDpKj2xMwfsF7n92aveEFYP0RMg86ClO9K93d3z6+AO218Dk2qrGUAxv82LOhC PgWPLLh3cWKdeFCNRKvHWAo5Z27LHxmBEr9KL2qIXi1n3Er1s9BZhvUOMBmih0ScBJsf qWggScdSB5b/CkHdk1yl3xvk+fRrUuzFeWJiFdvhhvjyXfWfO8UR9r/66v54+Ze3pXcV M+U8Yjbb88e9kGzOJh+xmD94MSZUnAGartJ/egKDd0xnLlRjXBgW6gFUhtrkdQKSzETf 1b5ZQ3Xn3WqIOHYwDsuuDfa7w+nnUNjWWiiJGXXpONVD+er4zASBZvEujsGXTHRRHUXk 6r6g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=exx549mZ4wZOuIYlwAsfFQ2NeFKjTPKmMjh6ey7W1ok=; b=oLJbqaHzZEPddS4T9AWb/RPlCpJsjpukNAWrGejNz2gk+ZfJqtrBL5+tybFbY1X5Ot jZW1UXPteTWsU1SEuZC8rezwbsPh3OWoKn9RR2QyklITDHCECBOhfKy21FlmPwpzECah NteRFN+8jaV0wouvUVk7t9LOl7nDrOBMF6q97s4vwLXt035Eoi7rn9YSL8C9cvTybUGm uqm6+WqoJvlfoxkpm2Qk162b1rDViYYOmPEAisL4MilQYtIVjKkUN34gznDJ5boiB0yL SIexu4/Rsb1ktA9SVujpRnJUwc+s2HwHM4qubjwEGQmzN+rsFjVWKXygI7W9Ewpf1uc+ sdyw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531mSSLPegtPZQs7qZje5Jb9b4UUzm1wuBNHJW63CrxDmId+uRzS PU7M5yrHRG7/VWJ2Ktjwm25hPbLcIK0w3AOpWU0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxPqwgevJJ5Kb1mkepsAjedqBLiVqIJSfuc8ygozmjn2PEVcJDIPC8GdgUl2Kz7Eu7vDPPCzgV65UAPP+Zpyq4= X-Received: by 2002:a02:840e:: with SMTP id k14mr35827187jah.133.1595408968125; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 02:09:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200306164104.15528-1-aostruszka@marvell.com> <1734533.zqhfolzEdB@thomas> <CALBAE1NGmZ_yrmKNroj6JYAG=JztgUWr2qaO=M2juVTta2hcpw@mail.gmail.com> <3669914.27dMEtFVk2@thomas> In-Reply-To: <3669914.27dMEtFVk2@thomas> From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:39:12 +0530 Message-ID: <CALBAE1Pmig0-RawsxFvMy6sA0oXcf3guj-VBN_xcLtJVJGkOfQ@mail.gmail.com> To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> Cc: "Andrzej Ostruszka [C]" <aostruszka@marvell.com>, =?UTF-8?Q?Morten_Br=C3=B8rup?= <mb@smartsharesystems.com>, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>, dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>, techboard@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] lib: introduce IF Proxy library X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 2:26 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote: > > 22/07/2020 10:45, Jerin Jacob: > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 6:10 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote: > > > > > > In addition may I ask your opinion on the changes that are required > > > > before the library can be accepted? > > > > > > Very few contributors take time to look at it. > > > Clearly we want this feature. We really want it, > > > but we are not able to dedicate enough time for its review (blaming myself). > > > That's why I Cc the techboard to try a new process: > > > > > > For such feature requiring a community design, > > > and not having enough feedback to progress in a timely manner, > > > I propose drafting the design in a Technical Board meeting > > > (a regular or specific one). > > > > Since the patch series already have the documentation for library[1], > > example application [2] > > in addition to the implementation. > > For everyone's benefit, it would good to know what is the expectation > > of draft design so that one can create > > such a document as part of the new process and it can apply for new > > another library. > > > > [1] http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/71953/ > > [2] http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/71956/ > > I don't understand Jerin. > What is your question? > Are you proposing to include a design document as part of the patches? No > In my opinion, the cover letter is a good place to explain a design. Agree. Currently, In the patch series already have the design[1] in the cover letter and documentation[2] [1] http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-June/171070.html [2] http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/71953/ Thomas, I did not understand the expectation of "I propose drafting the design in a Technical Board meeting". You mean, Techboard will define/draft the design? or Are you expecting anything from the patch submitter otherthan participating in the discussion. The description is not clear, Hence I am asking. > >