From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8606A0C4E;
	Tue, 12 Oct 2021 20:46:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD49410E5;
	Tue, 12 Oct 2021 20:46:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-lf1-f49.google.com (mail-lf1-f49.google.com
 [209.85.167.49]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA66410E1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 20:46:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-lf1-f49.google.com with SMTP id x27so1006317lfu.5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=OlJIEmq5PoZS5Hyo81Sm9V8/Du/myA2azAB+vkKmN34=;
 b=HgOaGIDqMmCHNultjWLACrZU6moupIILGv3mJSsjx3CZlLA8DL79dzQ4Ke5UoKFhxQ
 SGrfQ2W0MWx4EIxSK8QyZIhGyHl+s6ycYMaEkHX8KHmGKT+0WVQwR18bOoQxK0yxt8c+
 4zO3v2UDC18bpbFJGSLUQAHXLQ9IcRiBEQeh+qvbaiErxhRcD3/L+6T53r4SNRaViNLz
 fI+wrFMLZo8I1JFohY3KDQlO9SaUHRGS8b2gsPSvmxm3qE3cknEVOoO0aCwbacdDl1Ru
 tATbF0gYDZiX33FncbAMcO9u5mJIzDIcvirqt6gHoPFZdOZgP2mpOy2iS3fglG8QMwhj
 6LpQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=OlJIEmq5PoZS5Hyo81Sm9V8/Du/myA2azAB+vkKmN34=;
 b=63q8gSdTp3eehlh1GqtUVpoQ83kDeIwsSjKCN5LaWkzvxvI1JoaYWBLM5oK/TH2A+x
 28sZLv5CuKoPFVvPOo1aOXe4/COViOjPEJdTY6wJlyGXwsDmFlyI9p5FyWLpaRJo4J4d
 BU7bL0dBPq65phL38LS470WMQOwwp+Avl17K4FiIch8saXMdDXX9coDN64XoBWEwPV2U
 x12fbO94Ua8OU9mCJGW3NwQHhhwDBaCZ46kbT632xJj8eWZ64qQt4fpwuk9pZC8VjwJ9
 Ut4TUHEtyM78OlZp3qpUgY+MgEJ7mGIUmvfAW8tPvOarpH6as35Z13FDSu5122vF5GBf
 4XtQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533dNio6JibD/1/NqFK7tWrXe+OJHhBRiNWYRkRBqq3nGVsxpqfH
 h1rryVQhsITHu7oXs8Dyr/2y8EUGKXiNzwJ4ts4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzDc0w0pMxwS40/ve6fsl7zVIuE3zgG9nGKDLeWYvh9NqcShO+23VgiuZOLZaUJMPpPsEVcXCdjE29AbA+eCE4=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1aa:: with SMTP id
 c10mr18982592ljn.222.1634064415736; 
 Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20211012011107.431188-1-dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211012011107.431188-1-dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
From: William Tu <u9012063@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:46:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CALDO+SbKOnouG7dg-C7=dhXa14pFu5COgPHkSKJbdX4FpmhJkg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
Cc: dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
 Narcisa Ana Maria Vasile <navasile@linux.microsoft.com>, 
 Dmitry Malloy <dmitrym@microsoft.com>, Pallavi Kadam <pallavi.kadam@intel.com>,
 Ranjit Menon <ranjit.menon@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [kmods PATCH] windows/netuio: add interrupt support
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 6:11 PM Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Add IOCTL for interrupt event delivery to user space.
>
> * IOCTL_NETUIO_INTR_CONTROL:
>   Enable/disable the delivery of interrupt events.
>   This is a software switch to ignore received interrupts.
>   Programming the HW to stop issuing interrupts is up to the user.
>
> * IOCTL_NETUIO_INTR_QUERY:
>   Wait for an interrupt event on the specified vector.
>   More than one outstanding request may be issued for the same vector.
>   This can be used to balance the interrupt servicing if the requests
>   are issued using distinct handles waited by different threads.
>   If N identical requests are issued using the same handle,
>   one request will be completed each time the interrupt is triggered.
>
> MSI-X support is advertised for the driver, but the implementation
> works with any type of interrupts assigned by the kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
> ---

Hi Dmitry,
Is there a corresponding userspace code so I can give it a try?
s.t like sending IOCTL_NETUIO_INTR_CONTROL to enable a device's interrupt,
and blocked at IOCTL_NETUIO_INTR_QUERY for incoming request in the intr_queue.
Thanks
William