From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F0C6A04F3; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 16:58:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A5E1C0B1; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 16:58:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-qk1-f177.google.com (mail-qk1-f177.google.com [209.85.222.177]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7114A1BFE4 for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 16:58:13 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-qk1-f177.google.com with SMTP id x129so24805421qke.8 for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 07:58:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iith.ac.in; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=TNnWcndKS4TquwuBRvhGD3bgcHS/0j2wTLripaIzs6Q=; b=R84Ur/hDF2sxlFUHHZdgbwsndvkEfz6BrBdH8QyePyia0Ee1MnvJvZ/NiTcxN1gyMu vbxfDHMCSx0hjVm84Yde2CDFA17UoBtuozjicWdNM5sSHq2J+Bj3rcEQSJx8fnZP39d5 NHeAo6vz5zTAX8hNT1uWkuPC6BkFhEwmv+4B0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=TNnWcndKS4TquwuBRvhGD3bgcHS/0j2wTLripaIzs6Q=; b=sFASS2znKTA0P/PGvJt2DeNlGtC3WBQYDLCi2jujtmst6EJoLfN9I+oUo816mN/5Hn hJUCLZhW28B00EMLv9OXvY5KFu8rkudA7m95vXvHBd37e+Zwaezlt1haR991+YZEJVyZ xjnOWAaxutGM06fM26jAoOzNXk1wnnzSCTBggKdG4FsT5yKeK2R0qiV+NM6v0k2In6bS xMN5OZJO23Gwa+qVF8R/T73AK1QRfmQmXrEitvIp22pDSwbzfTS/BpO2MoIRjxSciqX4 0Ow7rJ9kA3Uk/UxU6q0gMdTVPLdI5jx8lDln14/vxk+S6wXee61kkpGYocX2skMBiQSA J7Lg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXmVxkjClySwEno+fM07vSc5KEJLku18yILBZUw0DbbbK+B9aiR owBWRuhvtwF7FYBzZ6rV8b7vLH3JD0QZTprl10DZoVrzl/YL0A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxSbCAgaZTY4WW7sy3nP/SCZmb3qA4YRQIaOdj1INZKtf4biuCP3260iX1APzbo9jghLuxsYPral3QWbnHH3Zw= X-Received: by 2002:a37:ac16:: with SMTP id e22mr51157412qkm.186.1577635092656; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 07:58:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Perugu Hemasai Chandra Prasad Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:28:01 +0530 Message-ID: To: users@dpdk.org, dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] segmentation fault in rte_eal_wait_lcore - regarding. X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi All, I have a segmentation fault issue regarding ret_eal_wait_lcore and rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(), I am running the code in a few logical cores using rte_eal_remote _launch() function which has a while (1) (infinite loop) in all the functions launched by remote launch and when i am terminating the code with 'ctrl+c' i am getting segmentation fault at rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(), then I replaced that with rte_eal_wait_lcore() for the respective logical cores even then i am getting a segmentation fault, can anyone please clarify this issue? Thanks & Regards, Hemasai