From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pb0-x233.google.com (mail-pb0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::233]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91C768C3 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:05:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pb0-f51.google.com with SMTP id un15so3120145pbc.24 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 06:06:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=qsAeb4fAUsGUfwGif+HGF7tVGiaRlxgLTpBUEEjhVsY=; b=ClXfKgFwuaSnYWKF+lxpOv5r6KcQ5Oxh2syVcfYwNtc0zXr1dIl4XKmiNE01kDxW7B f6zncd6JeV4lbEHEGbqkQb0vLBS89G1OxPFDnic9FpWAdZV3roBBQc1NQLEoSd8NIV+K AwPbJKy7ntUJ2fkisD2W/L+eImmtEvXly8fd9mM8oo6Kpzs4IcOgDxrqDjeHzTZLjMHy NOhIrjh9zRMXvEKByXxPih+qtpKQootu2yx0FvA4x7m73ycg70zAma1MNv9Y/0MO3p66 0KCpWg4PcQD61xVz2M8sALXRHbx79ml5xihrP9e8WF8+HldaW7QRcSmopdnUe6MnxUxM +Esg== X-Received: by 10.68.182.165 with SMTP id ef5mr1544108pbc.169.1391090784351; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 06:06:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.24.71 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 06:06:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <886FB96F-B46C-4129-A609-D80E5D1B2B5E@nyansa.com> From: Hamed khanmirza Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:36:04 +0330 Message-ID: To: Daniel Kaminsky Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Selecting Linux distribution for DPDK applications: CentOS or Debian X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:05:06 -0000 Hi Dan, We are also using Debian 7.3, from the DPDK v1.3.1 up to version 1.5.1r1. it works completely fine. regards, - Hamed On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Daniel Kaminsky < daniel.kaminsky@infinitelocality.com> wrote: > We're using CentOS 6.5 and Ubuntu 12.04 and don't see any issue with both > of them. > > Regards, > Daniel Kaminsky > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Prashant Upadhyaya < > prashant.upadhyaya@aricent.com> wrote: > > > Hi Dan, > > > > Intel DPDK release notes(1.5.2) mention the following tested OS -- > > * Fedora release 18 > > * Ubuntu* 12.04 LTS > > * Wind River* Linux* 5 > > * Red Hat* Enterprise Linux 6.3 > > * SUSE Enterprise Linux* 11 SP2 > > > > I have personally used Fedora 18 and it works fine for me for > > virtualization including SRIOV and pass through as well as virtio with > KNI > > backend. > > So I am tending to stick to Fedora 18. > > > > I don't know why is CentOS not tested and mentioned in release notes. > > > > Regards > > -Prashant > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Kan > > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 2:01 PM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Selecting Linux distribution for DPDK applications: > > CentOS or Debian > > > > I'm deciding between Debian 7.3 (3.2.0 kernel) and CentOS 6.5 (2.6.32 > > kernel) for production. I'm wondering if anyone has recommendation. We > run > > the DPDK application in a virtualized environment. Currently, we > configure > > NICs in pass-through mode which gives the best performance. In the > future, > > we plan to use DPDK with paravirtualized nics (eg. vmxnet3-usermap). > Thanks. > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > =============================================================================== > > Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html > > for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication. > > > > > =============================================================================== > > >