From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D21A0032;
	Tue, 21 Jun 2022 11:43:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F6B4069C;
	Tue, 21 Jun 2022 11:43:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-lf1-f45.google.com (mail-lf1-f45.google.com
 [209.85.167.45]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B392740151
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 11:43:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-lf1-f45.google.com with SMTP id j21so8292920lfe.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 02:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=semihalf.com; s=google;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=H8qbnf/GgxKVmf7BLV1TE/EesgyBkrzV2uMvTxOWaVY=;
 b=FwfMSP+655iXxZGxhJinL3yviJm0KdT9a5dTeVmfOQcXtXe/wvtqI/vwcYgieUTIjG
 CLDQR0aKd+2tgETDQRYIZ6mYAr8agjiYHDSfsOhKtPrxvT/hn5IQ9eYrO8hWaTB/CgZM
 V8x2/A2Dm42XFbou4WpA3c8HVX7m1xrRPPp4J9NAMMz1x/fIHMveW7vS3Z80W9kq9W42
 CxtMqejhX8FzacFMwKegJZ+4KccCPjpOmX1VmQxIq8URNZ9ZPwq8YlcL/71p5AaE4WnC
 z8sRxCYVgAmK2VGvjafzXbntq+ltU6kIYFwaKii/eRXM9iFXXgz5R8cpsdTlXPWuew6k
 t+7g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=H8qbnf/GgxKVmf7BLV1TE/EesgyBkrzV2uMvTxOWaVY=;
 b=eKICNmjHeKWYc/L48XtdQimZZBrMx35TdIZCIDZHjBfMGbNcLklcGN6mccTRrNuMVU
 8+b5O9nIIgDQR8x1R2D1FKX5Ve1jNJLAxLRKAo80xIM024i0Ic9LTecsjX/KHXwNBR2q
 XSyQ74+KSbiII2GlE7LFSW9pcJyDOt8xFGfmDicOzGQYPsN2gSuD5RradWx/WSAGyiqB
 JFvwRoaMWeJJgtXmYdJa6GTF8LYcSxIAIUYrU59eq3f/EIoPTywiS5VlKZvFEenqi+yJ
 9LnkOw/kQxIHkQ4LpTZAFoPpTZV4exXAzafy5B57QlUhBbUyqyqllr9bKkMTPL6uN3qV
 DXzw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/yGXeTjH4/OB71/HGLaOeu9X7wgLeuRmWe1RcgAmQSQw6F+LIw
 uZIZ1GI88giTt3hL3W4Bf4iJCsXrgc6vM0CSW5nm6A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vWGsqR+B0QYYbkE4YOv2Ai+UAhMQ5QrAjIOTVX5+kkCtJyaIao4AWEe3LSIMU6vEAbS4mFKPKt8H6pm5cVGwo=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:431a:0:b0:47f:6162:126 with SMTP id
 q26-20020a19431a000000b0047f61620126mr9265646lfa.394.1655804611193; Tue, 21
 Jun 2022 02:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220609121701.716299-1-kda@semihalf.com>
 <CAJFAV8yDTyLG8hGR+X2x0Yp9g=L91ZuaxaseNbg=CpUBm7FoAQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <63ed6e6c-337d-8f8a-9410-1e43b0561967@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <CALVGJW+86cUbfx0nKJMvwXcD0+sFBStFiWXjtMXnzrYC7Oe4fA@mail.gmail.com>
 <YrGRp5QfOaMsjhkF@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <YrGRp5QfOaMsjhkF@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Stanis=C5=82aw_Kardach?= <kda@semihalf.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 11:42:55 +0200
Message-ID: <CALVGJW+KJm3wRNtNo3jmWKqanUpwQfhvYN5-S50=hGotKnoUoA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix xmm_t to rte_xmm_t scalar conversion
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
 David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>, 
 dev <dev@dpdk.org>, upstream@semihalf.com, Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>, 
 "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>, 
 "Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
 Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 11:39 AM Bruce Richardson
<bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
> <snip>
> Generally the "cpp" binary is not the c-plus-plus one, but the C
> preprocessor one. Perhaps the original files are incorrect here, and shou=
ld
> all refer to g++.
>
> /Bruce
>
That does make sense. I'll submit a separate patchset fixing all
occurrences (of which there are many).

--=20
Best Regards,
Stanis=C5=82aw Kardach