From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93331B221 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 13:29:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id 196so15370750wma.1 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 04:29:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=8wYJsGnDIR6rvyrR/WNqMOezAT6Ad/ozFUqvCDEGw6E=; b=CK7SOEyiqE350jiydIwBjRaWwE5kx1xl9xnHTiY9UHVQBrR5Z8QfVTVsPpTJiZ5UOy AMrpMx2ov309VGml4HJDk6L2fOHIPNH1QUPQYgYZBGykCjehIiImPm+BRAwyttIGRR0B T0UyJe9O9PoyYi6gz3y26xAPBJZYIQo8ninK8qXWr3dh3wS4vptRzZDQe1FyU0PtZLJu fC6DdpO2YvGjS+oBmH8X7KcvayVObELFpP2nMBmZGLvuzXo39LLMzYIoaCBVrU3oBQrZ 32jg/ojeSu8Nk2kNk/lHGYV87rgenP9kYmylIcmWRbgi/0K9kivcsesSbQuBWcYgBdTm notQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8wYJsGnDIR6rvyrR/WNqMOezAT6Ad/ozFUqvCDEGw6E=; b=Tm5vr31QHL8gQOovbX2Ech5TEFIPkYXqpaWqqOOAAf/wjHnd5vP2Z2AwDR418amyzb o4IAnosGpstGMrJRbNTOIYhL+7GkrCJcfUFsC48gfwbfveARfN1x7zvRr9MD+H5+E6Ek uBdkNlyYY/ITMOusG5UCWMlNhVksAzhuIMlud+DfU03OAAipIfcGZlcgROMcTn9C8m7C VQh01lRMG1d9VxuZxgMdS+GuLwntrBXX1sF6w3zozFQWKEHDHqANsPjj7j4oKU2A1toD Yl1QHpbdlk2AXwTDhCFpoeKjblpGdnxNsMmSRbVbiCZfISf6u8+ZL44JMnlIDi+jsc6A otPw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVFQjEONvg5dLGLOZW9PtWmZaO0b8H3rO0lxwjRpWWBMdFQa0mk gWd3dJo4+v8ZOq46s2oGZtDFvzkyMQcia+N8Lco= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCFUgtPrdWJWuiLXm//smwlbdeKzoe2MkH4+wN9/7ku/zsp83HrerswhKXugRP1ELcZDV9kaKXUjrDbQfSfjTg= X-Received: by 10.223.182.19 with SMTP id f19mr8584414wre.166.1507634983502; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 04:29:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: jblunck@gmail.com Received: by 10.28.140.196 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 04:29:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20170712195846.65286-1-jblunck@infradead.org> <20171006083934.34819-4-jblunck@infradead.org> From: Jan Blunck Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 13:29:42 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: c-zQ3EqWKt0xkd29Ii0HLKCsfwA Message-ID: To: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Doherty, Declan" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] cryptodev: rework dependency on vdev header X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 11:29:43 -0000 On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:47 AM, De Lara Guarch, Pablo wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jan Blunck [mailto:jblunck@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jan Blunck >> Sent: Friday, October 6, 2017 9:40 AM >> To: dev@dpdk.org >> Cc: Doherty, Declan ; De Lara Guarch, Pablo >> >> Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] cryptodev: rework dependency on vdev header >> >> The rte_cryptodev_vdev_pmd_init() is a helper for vdev-based drivers. >> By moving the helper to the header we don't require rte_vdev.h at build- >> time of the librte_cryptodev library. This is a preparation to move the vdev >> bus into a standalone library. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck > > This looks good, but could you also remove the deprecation notice from the previous release? > Apart from that: > I wondered about that too. The message said that it will be static from 17.11 on and I wonder if we should actually keep it into the notes for this release.