From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com (mail-wm0-f66.google.com [74.125.82.66]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCDE2BA7; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 21:35:01 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f66.google.com with SMTP id u144so3080717wmu.0; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 12:35:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=Hpy85uB7RUQQUGAjl2cd6sELzNUqCw6/K8t2uwdInUM=; b=0rE7gpoqP1IHjSYZtqN9O3tmIRClx+RzZHrE5Q4zUZ9Ry75yeni2pbifAVuINHHjYM aowNNvPp5wpOhOaeAmylHY25PitNyHlepPtxxH6q784aQXAOUGs/4hz3aP1gCOjJ8EHC P0B0UNG798jpUjJXftAuqSoeB8hHXaUzMCcUo7iewMGn5qgRkBWsIWNRcBz97aOvRyI2 ONPTKchIJqGk8yXdSPIq9BMfjdbcaq3Y85jt2ORZk9Y/2DFqbEzjCk2F9DoLj+xAwIXF QwVdpyjUfczof3ZYknys9F2dibCmoBZu/bSeSu82G565JCKkJpCQ0T+n7BBdutFBd+Vj hq9A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Hpy85uB7RUQQUGAjl2cd6sELzNUqCw6/K8t2uwdInUM=; b=U7LiFSHN28bLac7qwl9j3vYpu73SiSt2K7gIA5c8BNqctnxagt9Cw4ucp8PvW91OB9 Q044Y3KC04erQeYolmN4wqKryF97PMMxNakN9xqkrZ7rcxf8R/yJXMlpiAEIDScmA05s YFTP4aQTWXvrdvkSzCQfRn6KlC+EWr/kt/VJBu2nREEJvO5scPb/481sdsBBh8O+YzuJ B3J83W0voVaIjCYMLplgAceqZzME/3sLSTiQ6AI0p/gRi4gReVnWqNFO7616AOkYsRSx 2xLpQEVuFmEfnESyOJWoV0Q/0X98KWj2OqG8OsWJrr+Og3DQdwWMhIXqxHXS1NWKwVTx rh6w== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00lQ40Inl5zvQlIn0O/WMM6yC0O0LL9pOgYok/Z+4ezudtdR8D7uJxB0QiLdTurK6bcL0/NhVRV2qpfsQ== X-Received: by 10.28.8.202 with SMTP id 193mr4836431wmi.101.1479933301395; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 12:35:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: jblunck@gmail.com Received: by 10.28.63.83 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 12:35:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20161007020225.GA22829@roosta.home> <1854c9f5-eedf-fc7b-a786-7526b80b6efa@samsung.com> <20161012152421.GC104428@bricha3-MOBL3> <20161013233714.GC17047@roosta> <61df7d78-c57a-d379-252a-aa7128e7e62e@intel.com> <20161025125750.GB57276@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> <674cdf6a-7a92-8d1a-4caa-f2582cf1b733@intel.com> <20161025140048.GB10444@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> <7c4bc057-93ee-42e1-b7ce-c87460aeee2a@intel.com> From: Jan Blunck Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 21:35:00 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Z9i43uysKD38wVuQRwA6Wty3HtY Message-ID: To: Ilya Maximets Cc: Ferruh Yigit , Bruce Richardson , Declan Doherty , Eric Kinzie , dev@dpdk.org, Heetae Ahn , Yuanhan Liu , Bernard Iremonger , stable@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] Revert "bonding: use existing enslaved device queues" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 20:35:01 -0000 On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote: > To be clear, I still insist on applying this path as is. > That is very kind of you. Please see the patches that I've send in reply to this thread which are required additionally to the revert you send. Happy Thanksgiving, Jan > Best regards, Ilya Maximets. > > On 21.11.2016 15:49, Ilya Maximets wrote: >> On 21.11.2016 14:39, Jan Blunck wrote: >>> Ferruh, >>> >>> I've been working on a patch but was distracted by other stuff and >>> therefore haven't tested it yet. >> >> Jan, on what patch are you working? I don't understand. >> >>> >>> Stay tuned, >>> Jan >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: >>>> >>>> Is there an update for this patch? Is a consensus reached? >> >> Ferruh, I didn't receive any response on my e-mails. I've pinged this thread >> few times, but didn't receive any feedback and I have no idea what patch Jan >> talking about. >> >> Best regards, Ilya Maximets. >>