From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f49.google.com (mail-oi0-f49.google.com [209.85.218.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA9F2E81 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:37:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-oi0-f49.google.com with SMTP id i138so265757oig.8 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 03:47:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=NfL3wt9v1a9ZbkcFkB6iJZb528Ip0BO6h4n9Eg9KpPE=; b=iwzRlQ969WVs0yNiEvsMscCj6BRIExeTcb+0/K3oTqHvfm7Qu++veizhKh4AMEd7D8 WQESx3O3J624tEvTHj60DIAJUr/kSTmbUGEpenyMXtAdGAX7vniy2arofqVQ59fk7XWd /e7wNVdvPAXjiOUXoIiBtTidbMlVin7mqlfjnPTm/uwZk3N96GJQ9HfgOyBL8qQfd9m7 S8g13TUxArxHblUdh7/MLtByiBDyioCkf/OF0piBgmuj5RfzujLB7jyBabhZomKsj1I0 zYkgFOhP/Ku5raWE9isyJm7b5Faag8w/tXMbhps8WfqUlv9XuE1qpLDE6ZG2JgKdZUfb GGtg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkVRNlLZwATekccWMssfVu134eaGy5Jl1dyy8ctg7VmDr3yotE9jbNo8Mc6gMtrvVYFuRBz MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.223.193 with SMTP id w184mr14369968oig.110.1416916077250; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 03:47:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.60.197 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 03:47:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1416933018-23415-1-git-send-email-ssujith@cisco.com> <1416933018-23415-7-git-send-email-ssujith@cisco.com> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:47:57 +0100 Message-ID: From: David Marchand To: "Sujith Sankar (ssujith)" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Prasad Rao \(prrao\)" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/6] DPDK changes for accommodating ENIC PMD X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:37:05 -0000 On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Sujith Sankar (ssujith) wrote: > David, > > I tested it now, and it looks like the length is proper in > dev->men_resource[0].len without this change. > Not sure what changed in my workspace as I clearly remember seeing it > wrong and hence added the extra statement in the lib. > > I shall remove it in v5. > Ok, thank you Sujith. -- David Marchand