From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david.marchand@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-oi0-f46.google.com (mail-oi0-f46.google.com
 [209.85.218.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E285960
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  9 Feb 2015 10:10:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-oi0-f46.google.com with SMTP id a141so21539363oig.5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 01:09:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=Kd1edeY4oS0aZyoiUoEy6/slq0ZD77bHk7C0s7l9Uos=;
 b=myv24Oulv+SKhd/+Ik3yo9mbKq60K+XX5Yu3ud6UN9SPYXPGRz+REp5MwcTaJtv+2C
 w5W6u3pN4FputQX+W9PbCBdPhfMeDJ1RvNPgSthjG+u3IgxYv8b1+YuDoab7cb7f0MRI
 63svh+3vtzfPs6W6XO68zNKwks6R3ySOxCCTJIlY41yWe+dzfiWHQP5+HcvwlJH9TBnW
 GkKjf5Xq1ihyxux9EAfz7Lc5wHOw86TV1+jG2EKaVuBXQR/iF/CDeTp0SYbluMRsodr+
 Fxsvkcdf4IDRF0xB6Jxdzsm2N+bmBGVCzcEF7e7TrAwiwoZG120v4RHmOIrMUDHTUGo8
 osXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmeXO9+3VbPS29D1kNRhy+wzkLMtUzvro/pTNwRD+AauI4nZlX37Sv3jN5FxZlpAKTOb7Y/
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.213.38 with SMTP id np6mr10899930obc.34.1423472999430;
 Mon, 09 Feb 2015 01:09:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.95.198 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 01:09:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1423463570-12947-2-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com>
References: <1423463570-12947-1-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com>
 <1423463570-12947-2-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 10:09:59 +0100
Message-ID: <CALwxeUsn0-FMEh_YN3Ye53nuJZ1EaMKJaD4F5Z3_7FYei2gvUw@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>
To: Jijiang Liu <jijiang.liu@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] i40e:advertise TSO capability
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:10:00 -0000

Hello,

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Jijiang Liu <jijiang.liu@intel.com> wrote:

> Advertise the DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_TSO flag in the PMD features. It means
> that the i40e PMD supports the offload of TSO.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jijiang Liu <jijiang.liu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Miroslaw Walukiewicz <miroslaw.walukiewicz@intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c |    3 ++-
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> b/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> index 6f385d2..fd625f9 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> @@ -1530,7 +1530,8 @@ i40e_dev_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct
> rte_eth_dev_info *dev_info)
>                 DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
>                 DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM |
>                 DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_SCTP_CKSUM |
> -               DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_OUTER_IPV4_CKSUM;
> +               DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_OUTER_IPV4_CKSUM |
> +               DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_TSO;
>         dev_info->reta_size = pf->hash_lut_size;
>
>         dev_info->default_rxconf = (struct rte_eth_rxconf) {
>


Correct me if I am wrong, but this patch introduces a feature implemented
in the following commit.
Those patches should be submitted in the opposite order.


-- 
David Marchand