From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-f179.google.com (mail-ob0-f179.google.com [209.85.214.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8505AB46E for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:42:38 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id wp4so18863208obc.10 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 03:42:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=FP2kS/IzELpgKl9JB+VukGoHabrlomkbVg4eaioF+iE=; b=IjSva0V34N+b5jsbpeN7EyHoMJvkvOmZ67HxMe5Ma6vYpcARvJo04MdT4NJmqdrna/ ZWiaFh3UXg2QG9wJiyjMzZrlV0DM2u4roWWMQOdADcKNmVcl932LBIzzGGZ1JK8zNFYe /deGREj5mZqb5BmGDhmRIPaOxLioJn7Qm3cgx5nDn/SR1j66n0dg9/afQhYyAj2oDtDS L0CSe//R9VY+kta0M/6QW5M1QhRyULEQbvO+oZFyqW8Rb8wtazsAnddlIdECtNSXnRfU 6G5miKhMWuY8HlcJqNCbN2fc0MKWLRGAhEMd8kmgqHpOfZB8V1gsipJ6sXEtfKR4nblZ 7+uA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnMlG+JKYEbBLaEuDBOM02KEJrkQumUfuqW2h37EES5xyBP1JsrN5AW3pEkhHg5Ar7e/BfA MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.143.42 with SMTP id sb10mr6055512obb.27.1423827757949; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 03:42:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.95.198 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 03:42:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1423815597-17819-11-git-send-email-jing.d.chen@intel.com> References: <1423618298-2933-2-git-send-email-jing.d.chen@intel.com> <1423815597-17819-1-git-send-email-jing.d.chen@intel.com> <1423815597-17819-11-git-send-email-jing.d.chen@intel.com> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:42:37 +0100 Message-ID: From: David Marchand To: "Chen Jing D(Mark)" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 10/17] fm10k: add receive and tranmit function X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:42:38 -0000 Hello, On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Chen Jing D(Mark) wrote: [snip] + > + /* set checksum flags on first descriptor of packet. SCTP checksum > + * offload is not supported, but we do not explicitely check for > this > + * case in favor of greatly simplified processing. */ > Checkpatch is complaining : WARNING: 'explicitely' may be misspelled - perhaps 'explicitly'? #328: FILE: lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_rxtx.c:261: + * offload is not supported, but we do not explicitely check for this -- David Marchand