DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>
To: Kamil Rytarowski <Kamil.Rytarowski@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] eal/linux: Add support for handling built-in kernel modules
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 18:14:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALwxeUsqNRkD80vCk0oLCVOktyKPDe2y7XnEavt2JriRPrd1rw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449507460-32038-2-git-send-email-Kamil.Rytarowski@caviumnetworks.com>

Hello Kamil,

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Kamil Rytarowski <
Kamil.Rytarowski@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:

> Currently rte_eal_check_module() detects Linux kernel modules via reading
> /proc/modules. Built-in ones aren't listed there and therefore they are not
> being found by the script.
>
> Add support for checking built-in modules with parsing the sysfs files
>
> Signed-off-by: Kamil Rytarowski <Kamil.Rytarowski@caviumnetworks.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c
> b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c
> index 635ec36..6cab906 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@
>  #if defined(RTE_ARCH_X86_64) || defined(RTE_ARCH_I686)
>  #include <sys/io.h>
>  #endif
> +#include <sys/types.h>
> +#include <sys/stat.h>
>
>  #include <rte_common.h>
>  #include <rte_debug.h>
> @@ -902,7 +904,10 @@ int
>  rte_eal_check_module(const char *module_name)
>  {
>         char mod_name[30]; /* Any module names can be longer than 30
> bytes? */
> +       char sysfs_mod_name[PATH_MAX];
> +       struct stat st;
>         int ret = 0;
> +       int rv;
>         int n;
>
>         if (NULL == module_name)
> @@ -918,9 +923,23 @@ rte_eal_check_module(const char *module_name)
>                 n = fscanf(fd, "%29s %*[^\n]", mod_name);
>                 if ((n == 1) && !strcmp(mod_name, module_name)) {
>                         ret = 1;
> -                       break;
> +                       goto finish;
>                 }
>         }
> +       RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "Module %s not found in /proc/modules",
> +               module_name);
> +
> +       /* A module might be builtin, try sysfs */
> +       snprintf(sysfs_mod_name, PATH_MAX, "/sys/module/%s", module_name);
> +       if ((rv = stat(sysfs_mod_name, &st)) == 0) {
> +               ret = 1;
> +               goto finish;
> +       }
> +
> +       RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "Open %s failed! error %i (%s)\n",
> +               sysfs_mod_name, errno, strerror(errno));
> +
> +finish:
>         fclose(fd);
>
>         return ret;
>

Well, in the end, won't all modules end up in /sys/module ?
So, I would say we can get rid of /proc/modules parsing.

The only thing that bothers me is this comment in the kernel documentation :


/sys/module/MODULENAME
                The name of the module that is in the kernel.
This
                module name will always show up if the module is loaded as
a
                dynamic module.  If it is built directly into the kernel,
it
                will only show up if it has a version or at least
one

parameter.


                Note: The conditions of creation in the built-in case are
not
                by design and may be removed in the
future.

But, at the moment, I suppose we are fine.


-- 
David Marchand

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-07 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1449499771-31466-1-git-send-email-Kamil.Rytarowski@caviumnetworks.com>
2015-12-07 16:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] tools: " Kamil Rytarowski
2015-12-07 16:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] eal/linux: " Kamil Rytarowski
2015-12-07 17:14     ` David Marchand [this message]
2015-12-07 18:36   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] tools: " Kamil Rytarowski
2015-12-07 18:36     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] eal/linux: " Kamil Rytarowski
2015-12-07 20:45       ` David Marchand
2015-12-07 20:55       ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-12-08  7:25         ` Panu Matilainen
2015-12-08 13:08           ` Kamil Rytarowski
2015-12-08 15:33     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] tools: " Kamil Rytarowski
2015-12-08 15:33       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] eal/linux: " Kamil Rytarowski
2015-12-09  7:30         ` Panu Matilainen
2015-12-09 13:28           ` Kamil Rytarowski
2015-12-09 13:19       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] tools: " Kamil Rytarowski
2015-12-09 13:19         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] eal/linux: " Kamil Rytarowski
2015-12-09 16:38           ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-12-09 16:45             ` Kamil Rytarowski
2016-01-18 14:22           ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-01-19 16:38             ` Kamil Rytarowski
2015-12-16 14:14         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] tools: " Kamil Rytarowski
2016-01-18  9:26           ` Kamil Rytarowski
2016-01-18 14:21         ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-01-19 16:34           ` Kamil Rytarowski
2016-01-18 14:32         ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-01-19 16:35           ` Kamil Rytarowski
2016-01-26 15:12             ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-01-28 11:16               ` Kamil Rytarowski
2016-01-20  9:48         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 " krytarowski
2016-01-20  9:48           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] eal/linux: " krytarowski
2016-01-26  9:31           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] tools: " Kamil Rytarowski
2016-01-26 15:23           ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-01-28 11:17             ` Kamil Rytarowski
2016-01-28 11:22               ` Panu Matilainen
2016-01-28 12:54                 ` Kamil Rytarowski
2016-01-28 13:52               ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-01-28 15:33                 ` Kamil Rytarowski
2016-01-28 13:13           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 " krytarowski
2016-01-28 13:13             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/2] eal/linux: " krytarowski
2016-02-09 14:56               ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-09 16:07                 ` Kamil Rytarowski
2016-01-29  7:21             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/2] tools: " Yuanhan Liu
2016-02-08 22:14               ` Kamil Rytarowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALwxeUsqNRkD80vCk0oLCVOktyKPDe2y7XnEavt2JriRPrd1rw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=david.marchand@6wind.com \
    --cc=Kamil.Rytarowski@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).