From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f46.google.com (mail-oi0-f46.google.com [209.85.218.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CADE2EDA for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 09:39:40 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-oi0-f46.google.com with SMTP id s4so11275373oif.3 for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:39:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=T3Mf6wx9Tsj9XdAeDXO4+tTao3sjfla9AR4PYqdWlJQ=; b=ffaII2lRZ42ZU9E5Z5/gLoL0xutiVoAdWtol/I1RlPyvZZo5HlXlW2mPbE0QtnDYFj uF2FS/s3HF9Rxus/1onZhA9PDK4NG2tAJBFXqYQ3ENg7GYqtevO+FOvldnGvR6IGypzk wwd5Q4yG27kygZPClVD/CEs0ftO5Al3ROv0uqae3CYoHXjf4gnTt59CXnnQPZR62yY+E mXRZbgywx9I2qTpuKYUE/DChi09Spsgy5VdErtR9W070Wyj33lyCgnbiEi9wW8WEv0Ao Mq+0oioYw3gQJyPDBQjz80W7njD+MEYsBCRcGzMM6GJ2nsourLlCOHIDJSGQvvPIHT9B fWeg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=T3Mf6wx9Tsj9XdAeDXO4+tTao3sjfla9AR4PYqdWlJQ=; b=cVM6CoBBQKoQvk8xs6m+HpsT6AFxZE/Kqe4G4XdxvXzJCfkNpR0uNiNjgUdlTkQm5H DwhnFjYL17DlhVe5h++AEDCt8YW93QNAx/mHclLp96RZR7eiPdYCp4lHF/LWQSZBpguc GblIbgKGhDbvIodEVxH5s2FrWAbuFptUUaXgWTVYuNx+yqL4hEj1RydNCOVUDpU13pYi 9442Hz/Ne7hLBeOKASOKd921rGSYLO+9pQmozad9S9jCLoVCY6q0TRjnEoTa0I7bxaCZ rrj/DEbmyWowhX3eehAOCpaxAco+qB8rFIwG//kiRcZtx3AyGC34cThqH/nWzV9TnwK7 ZyJw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTfp//valWTo4CLkhnaIoX00u/du2k2M0a2RvPrl91yCqlpK8a18trtYT/ptFb54zWwmmCg8AMQsKSnwfbk X-Received: by 10.202.212.79 with SMTP id l76mr2393205oig.22.1455007180120; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:39:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.76.180.72 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 00:39:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20160208143153.0a01f7fe@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <1453476464-31767-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com> <1454078953-23744-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com> <20160208143153.0a01f7fe@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz> From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 09:39:20 +0100 Message-ID: To: Jan Viktorin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/9] pci cleanup and blacklist rework X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 08:39:41 -0000 Hello Jan, On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Jan Viktorin wrote: > I am confused a bit. I started to review the "[PATCH 0/9] prepare for rte_device > / rte_driver" series and then I've noticed there are 2 patch series having "pci: > no need for dynamic tailq init" patch there. But then, there is this v2 that does > not have this patch. What is the right one? What should I look at. Is related? I splitted this initial series, because I want to dissociate the work trying to get to rte_driver/rte_device from other work that modifies pci code (blacklist rework and "autobind"). I think you want to look at [1], but, if you want the global picture, first apply [1], then [2] ([2] is the v2 patchset which supersedes the initial patchset that had this "pci: no need for dynamic tailq init" patch in it). [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-January/032387.html [2] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-January/032398.html Regards, -- David Marchand