From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david.marchand@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-pd0-f171.google.com (mail-pd0-f171.google.com
 [209.85.192.171]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CFC2E8F
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  6 Mar 2014 11:08:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pd0-f171.google.com with SMTP id r10so2353034pdi.30
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 02:10:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=2UshOjTqWByWMo7ZInFPdzHr4OzUXRi5cLJC+u0d/n8=;
 b=QIi++Oov0gGYjicyYkCNgQGr7NN3tgQ0zl1B5LSHVSvDJdGjnLqsJxGAInnwGDQK2J
 7NxgFce8cm83ISQo5Nx0ALTb8lI6F0SPZ0hGr2fjSr1koRsO0xRtYKwhSwAuEfLsy6G3
 ZRc7/3KEOauvYSdmWFsDA/iG4HNgutn8HxZI4kfLpfHGqhpIDXBZH4RSVXHkR/Lj4S97
 l4oXk2pG2VGzoXhWYUS0JZexCRIwfbm78OuGN1hYQETWPbJ9z3U8s13+ALwVvsjB4MTS
 LNjNnXZxf7VZIbViIOTy4hBlBWDeQ394FuYPdDI7LGn8aNvK4b+jKHK87tYEaK7vD5y7
 Pk+A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlJ1lEpiSv4HMznVYvjoAsdRTt7kM5k4GqAWSHrA1uVkb5fisBxMFQEyh/wPdB28FnBe9d4
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.13.138 with SMTP id h10mr13256956pac.148.1394100611102;
 Thu, 06 Mar 2014 02:10:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.14.65 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 02:10:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1394096440-50930-1-git-send-email-liljegren.mats2@gmail.com>
References: <CA+Typ9k1hSKwPx6oUTCs3KGJuQZXtsxZod7ge+n0-K_rzTqmNA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1394096440-50930-1-git-send-email-liljegren.mats2@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 11:10:11 +0100
Message-ID: <CALwxeUtLbcJMiJ62rn+O0_z3crFy53Uw-tP1zSQ3xfdFRs5Y=g@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>
To: Mats Liljegren <liljegren.mats2@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Pcap question
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:08:43 -0000

Hello Mats, Meir,

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:00 AM, <liljegren.mats2@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I had this problem a couple of months ago, and tracked it down to a
> check for a macro named pcap_sendpacket. I didn't have this macro, but
> it is a function, so I simply removed the check and got things
> working.
> I thought I mentioned this in the DPDK mailing list, but I cannot find
> any evidence of this. So I probably didn't...
>
> Since I have lost the original patch I used to solve this issue, I
> made a new patch that might work for you, which you should be able to
> find as a reply to this message. It was made completely out of my
> memory of this and I haven't tested it, but the change is pretty
> trivial so I'm sure you can work out any mistakes I might have made.

Actually, the more I look at this, the more I think we should just revert
the
patches I submitted to support old pcap libraries.
I will send a revert patch for now and try to find a better approach later.

So, the patch from Olivier (resolving the conflict on kvargs) and the revert
patch I will send should be enough.
Can you confirm it is working fine for you ?


Regards,
--
David Marchand