From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david.marchand@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-oi0-f47.google.com (mail-oi0-f47.google.com
 [209.85.218.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2083975
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:51:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-oi0-f47.google.com with SMTP id v63so156173oia.34
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 02:02:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=ONbp4JOfapki5Qjxe5S/LMrIhTDtCswxPITrEyXVMYc=;
 b=hP93IGGmWyOEuHIMg4bmqptQh5BphuH1ufymjSButdWdquxN0p+yCToM0n1N6r16va
 RuWjJkNxNWLnG+d57Q8Q59DR1HKE7PzxF2hq21dCddYF9XDmvKXUpgU2axcbcZFb/Dyh
 82qrfS4tfJzbdBK2k3si63nOgO7mYA8nTDxoXXNdKhg3Oc/1HNhkv43xmbGSduEW4xnK
 GZiB0vYZDHOx3k6vRRjI7E09RcKXysIRC59llaxfvckNXZYrCwnJG7b35S3ZbusJFOXD
 oK1z0nppPSwFuM+qjn+tBLQq4zmkFWmBoN9Fok/ZUKSAknzqYbLFVH+UzrMlY7yHKk/B
 jnpg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnVO/3vYt2V3Fx3cYRlqiMaUzOTNLohY8/Oj0Wo2h/Rfr1XZagPehJdT5fCe5c9rYpcxWdH
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.45.198 with SMTP id t189mr13689687oit.68.1416909724967; 
 Tue, 25 Nov 2014 02:02:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.202.60.197 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 02:02:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1416933018-23415-7-git-send-email-ssujith@cisco.com>
References: <1416933018-23415-1-git-send-email-ssujith@cisco.com>
 <1416933018-23415-7-git-send-email-ssujith@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:02:04 +0100
Message-ID: <CALwxeUtiCb5vOyFFmd3UeOa0ohCZSP71K6jrRrYSaWPhVRWrBw@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>
To: Sujith Sankar <ssujith@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "Prasad Rao \(prrao\)" <prrao@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/6] DPDK changes for accommodating ENIC
	PMD
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 09:51:14 -0000

Hello Sujith,

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Sujith Sankar <ssujith@cisco.com> wrote:

> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_vfio.c
> b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_vfio.c
> index c776ddc..87e7862 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_vfio.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_vfio.c
> @@ -736,6 +736,7 @@ pci_vfio_map_resource(struct rte_pci_device *dev)
>                 maps[i].offset = reg.offset;
>                 maps[i].size = reg.size;
>                 dev->mem_resource[i].addr = bar_addr;
> +               dev->mem_resource[i].len = reg.size;
>         }
>
>         /* if secondary process, do not set up interrupts */
>

I still think this part is wrong.
The length should have been populated by pci_parse_sysfs_resource().
Are you sure this length is 0 ?

Can you do give me the result of cat
/sys/bus/pci/devices/$your_device_pci_address/resource ?

Thanks.

-- 
David Marchand