From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98D619F5 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 13:36:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id o80so45537751wme.1 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 04:36:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=t5+F3+VD+7inA7YPPS2NZOsQmLBPX+nwZGUk4tG9940=; b=W4dLXVyN/1ny2cGjc+nwcf0rQ0QvOkxFrGAx7oyFg7NOnDPtN4qHBqk8rOruVjOiCK MwXbqea75pzHbxVMyPGAZcxBkMlmQbpqRdcuLWgoQSht38L448B9xRjSEXyYoB3/nq+F 4PdyI5+UBMFQsHtXn1xU32/WAbBTrsDHKY1W+SZ3wvaqgveWWMWzVUMMoXI+iwnp7I/K mPjp8aY3KsmuKo9nPRqXRSTYvroeAcQo1Xp4KaJtUher6jI2UG6Cvr8KqY5R4Kyx60ry CSmhzLefqHAmspsbzCzoG7s+7HBm4k1Pfg9J/ela6j/nGR+C/YMC3zzTnfq+x4ApyQTw 4n3g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=t5+F3+VD+7inA7YPPS2NZOsQmLBPX+nwZGUk4tG9940=; b=TeLzcUHjjTVGXYG56NH/2hzP0uoovrMi5y+jDfwO8xvQ5eObAzJyl9rNQ7u50JvKHG 99rluQV3MkWAQOOXTP4i88BoyYG61WvVcb9WbZsEZJuXog3faZcUgWNBcpUtY/+laadg SAa2OlkjDLaIcpfHPlONdAlx9Nh6nGRfIGPYzhS5oKZ5e4LKzvFYx+7e7srsfxAWjKRs +QP0TbZlpbhV1ZzunGFpWkmNe763IHzUjYjrvgN/xry+IpGeqMpCpQUZB6C/xf2aNg/b mSSm0BQOQMA0bSb02OI4ifYicM9yRldQfYx47po25m+SPuJrl3zAfiwgmkMppXnz2Mtc MdAA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI6WxntJzXNV50rwco3U9V2faIQ4bUxEJIE8uevRmM7hDkc3hx0Atb+hWci2y+sq1G5PnhbQYTA7U+swCAD X-Received: by 10.28.94.18 with SMTP id s18mr14523578wmb.42.1468236966440; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 04:36:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.46.69 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 04:35:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1698058.nWbIbKdPp2@xps13> References: <1453120248-28274-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com> <2858831.tSF8KXeB50@xps13> <20160711053326.GW26521@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> <1698058.nWbIbKdPp2@xps13> From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 13:35:46 +0200 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Yuanhan Liu , "dev@dpdk.org" , Stephen Hemminger , "Richardson, Bruce" , Neil Horman , Panu Matilainen , Christian Ehrhardt , Wenzhuo Lu , Ferruh Yigit , Rasesh Mody , johndale@cisco.om, Yong Wang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 01/13] e1000: move pci device ids to driver X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:36:06 -0000 Hello all, On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-07-11 13:33, Yuanhan Liu: >> I'm not quite sure I understood it well: are you asking us to resend >> what David has already send, say me for resending the virtio part? >> >> If so, what's the point of that? What's worse, it's likely to fail >> apply (due to conflicts), as every one of us make a patch based on >> the same base while touching some same files. > > Good point. > There were some changes since the patches from David (and a new bnxt). > That's why I was thinking to ask maintainers to take care of this change. > But maybe it's better to do the change in one patchset. > David, ok to refresh these patches? Now that we have a modinfo-like infra and the test code is exempt from igb pci ids, all that remains (to fully get rid of this header) are bypass api and kni/ethtool. So the deal with Thomas is that I refresh those patches letting igb and ixgbe pmd as is. Will send this later. -- David Marchand