From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com (mail-oi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903A25952 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 14:57:51 +0100 (CET) Received: by oiav63 with SMTP id v63so5677881oia.13 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 05:57:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=BjdB5TlWzpAdOM+Za44/XrABlqRXhhB1dLTO0VIRnHk=; b=NQwo01DVPidhfzNsYshHqeQWdcOirTXLdjrqyW90zP3AjqLZmn/43SN8frK2wZb7Kr WcLdIc5Gibyr5lPt/YYDQ8PABePdJS7GBCX8ZEyMu2gcqu69dkPwZCvauKeP4875OUXS AlRjHhj+pOL1OAQY0dMFe4uif2f1s5PFFbB8cpGkOxU/7Lkk7OB52ztafTHCMlhvWa2W vMeSIC4MABJv6N8OuzNXGpar+rTRsN425EdyZqB4bwHozpqZ3E7PR5uzg/EviW1V5nGP VpHymRh4nT0URGFWfzErbK4SixX+7t5S2uyg2Wq1pcdUw9Qx9QKCsFCr+CF1Wwk2n2hF CXzw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlu5cYueK0l92lfch6K2jds6ATbaRTZ5i2QJALJTWj4Ot7T/UKM/lz+SttAykCtO5tApPf8 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.102.21 with SMTP id a21mr2923324oic.118.1425477470950; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 05:57:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.34.35 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 05:57:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150304134911.GC544@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1534932.rt5IAT3UZl@xps13> <54F6E6E3.50404@redhat.com> <20150304112805.GA5808@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <20150304130848.GA544@bricha3-MOBL3> <54F7077C.1010504@redhat.com> <20150304133129.GB544@bricha3-MOBL3> <54F70B9D.7040903@redhat.com> <20150304134911.GC544@bricha3-MOBL3> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 14:57:50 +0100 Message-ID: From: David Marchand To: Bruce Richardson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] config: default to shared library X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 13:57:51 -0000 On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 03:41:49PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > Right, but then there's "ivshmem" that doesn't fit that description > either > > AFAICS. > > Ah, yes, forgotten about that one! :-) Well, this is out of scope, but this config file should not exist in the first place. >>From my point of view, the ivshmem implementation is just badly hooked into the eal, and this is the only reason why ivshmem should have a build option (disabled) by default. If we could cleanup this, then there would be no exception to the naming convention. -- David Marchand