From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f45.google.com (mail-oi0-f45.google.com [209.85.218.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979A311A2 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 09:41:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by oiev17 with SMTP id v17so53795310oie.1 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:41:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SGixfoTYQL3xGKgy9snvDgMzQX85QBYxeTd+2q0HPmY=; b=PUz1P4y/u6MqZZWNYmSNpSUZeefmzuQonSHzF7IC5aMkHmtRqVPIWPXj9wJhWULXiW rpRFM5llMH6MPrF3cMEfJdZXjzd7pY9eDSzgxOMg9C0U9usKMJK9HnuodRQs2t3rwZFJ GEUwNeEu6DzrhKweiGyGqaezW/88GynHXj6ViYq/DboUOZlVwlPPz8EDIc+BiCLk2Xjm bojTGH+YbuWbCiJLYQgASnwHfkmdwU9nSnbOz856HWv6MI3IM5kR9QmfFz4tzvcYPzD/ JBEfSgTuLXt7MRQOHw3RfI/2aGXGJVENiAMM138ktOOIXEzSJ4DLH/sQX6iNViN8CCet /xfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmWuzxdLCEqzo5u2d5L7fUqyF2/BPSPPnO+yETDh/9yV1UtuQNGmbYNUs78+Sqca8IKAIxw MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.52.67 with SMTP id b64mr10432207oia.0.1442821308934; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:41:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.150.166 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:41:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1442760674-19482-3-git-send-email-helin.zhang@intel.com> References: <1442760674-19482-1-git-send-email-helin.zhang@intel.com> <1442760674-19482-3-git-send-email-helin.zhang@intel.com> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 09:41:48 +0200 Message-ID: From: David Marchand To: Helin Zhang , "Richardson, Bruce" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , yulong.pei@intel.com Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] i40e: Enlarge the number of supported queues X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 07:41:50 -0000 Hello Helin, Bruce, On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Helin Zhang wrote: > It enlarges the number of supported queues to hardware allowed > maximum. There was a software limitation of 64 per physical port > which is not reasonable. > I looked at the commit that introduced this limitation, can't we just get rid of this ? The primary process should know the current max queue number and initialises the array properly before any secondary process tries to set any callback, or tries to call rx/tx functions. Did I miss something ? -- David Marchand