From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-f171.google.com (mail-ob0-f171.google.com [209.85.214.171]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1F45A1F for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 18:33:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: by obqa2 with SMTP id a2so39203853obq.3 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 09:33:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=D5HUzArU9E5MQXke1yZe3eiC/lccPVD0wF3ado/rRmg=; b=G2/ECA9kxhVQSFDuuP1ZvJo9Ps5rQ5Na7DWjlvDBFVYh8RdjT/cSh5hI9iwqII51Rx q7ghevEEw6TFi450ESsz7ytz4VONT0FfY3WIzSRoB/vfVwiSvplBGKtCMonxso77cDfj ke321vlP27O1DWeDqoq677nQX2cLm7DPcab0blgbqVxk2G3VO/FljFQ+quCMgtu/ZCJp EaDQGLnXstazkRBGKgzwNrT3lRZI+0dtlmXJROE5NBFoHYQ+VE199gv7ev0kuh47OUqQ o2p9as6suH9jWGjrj5w6yURkPIi4XR+MPwZgBTCeyJ7AkK/OwD+buDZXPm1VSwVOM3+c 1BIA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlE6xj+UjB5n9IwCmQbc9PZtm0LAlUNNNV1bmYm0mWwCMI0BeFSc5xpAtpOxGN+YoUltB1z MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.175.71 with SMTP id by7mr25645409oec.58.1441902826251; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 09:33:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.84.233 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 09:33:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1441900908-29763-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> References: <1441900908-29763-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 18:33:46 +0200 Message-ID: From: David Marchand To: Ferruh Yigit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] igb_uio: use existing PCI macros X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 16:33:47 -0000 Hello Ferruh, On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > To get pci_dev and vf number from dev, benefit from > existing macros in pci.h > > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit > Correct me if I am wrong but you might need to provide wrappers for kernel version <= 2.6.34 (or something that indicates availability of those). Please, can you confirm this is just a cleanup and you are not fixing anything ? Thanks. -- David Marchand