From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f194.google.com (mail-qk0-f194.google.com [209.85.220.194]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC2CADB9 for ; Tue, 10 May 2016 18:14:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qk0-f194.google.com with SMTP id n62so952735qkc.2 for ; Tue, 10 May 2016 09:14:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=i5wnTPAr3lrErydaN8IWaL74WWfN+mOyo6mTvGbXte4=; b=yHHNA7IqsBEw9APbhnznuZU9Xkt0xwpzmfnyl1T4E/Hum1vTHROfskBWmEdn3Bcqip kLEYvQQpkw5ngh/K450EBUbS4J5w3m5LC6i8oFwsQoUEdQaDsc7J/pc82i1pFdYm1UC0 pK7HRPGl4siHeS+wQbIg+X9reeoz8uZcFn0Ms4INU+KkPaT4k/IF7RJZvUvcJzbNLalj hogVxYl29w2lKXYi6vS6AwhFW01hVICNCJElcXvJQ4VoUPZjGUU8Xq+0/Z2Nly64ddyu wEldAdf8mRy614+yd300ic2QCKP6s2U5tEDv6+ejhMtqxZh5E8EMckp/CrTIdFP5Tw8J Dv7A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=i5wnTPAr3lrErydaN8IWaL74WWfN+mOyo6mTvGbXte4=; b=FjpG/zjfnSaIC8jorlW3lcExt8hIshpDl2zqJd1d8jxHATQj4zaBQWlYM2Kb46uXPD fuF9QbpbkA2KzmN7hGzBK45YOlC7+PvSMZE+Gi5DAYaCThtvoj5ixsI4fLUllipkOLbI DN5+AqiERzrLT+C299TSa2B7bgxGa+qFvPch0WDfrc4i9LQtEu2f54MwbJmMXy3OuIWo qMbZHzTDNcFWQI3tSitMc5uPpXboiS42yoJNY2T18ci5Xj0NF5gRNbwflZE6+o6xKFJK znVANZLvyAaI00tek373V5hIKDwfyzAfureIR9MuCb1Z856DjsT0SptK+9wzf3dSPY8A TDAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVOEX1xO4QGlRyZd/lhDiMqvtxi9Gu+U4/h0PUitgXjYz0hsr0z81H5LX7mqwgeQSeaydVy7vX1c7vFOw== X-Received: by 10.55.174.68 with SMTP id x65mr45150247qke.184.1462896854208; Tue, 10 May 2016 09:14:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.31.134 with HTTP; Tue, 10 May 2016 09:13:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2de4ef85-cdd0-9cd8-f1ff-20f81930a258@intel.com> References: <6cbfe6bd-b4c4-c0c8-3969-9d362193d8b3@intel.com> <2de4ef85-cdd0-9cd8-f1ff-20f81930a258@intel.com> From: Mahdi Moradmand Badie Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 12:13:34 -0400 Message-ID: To: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy Cc: dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_malloc X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 16:14:15 -0000 No, I don't have any idea? :) On 10 May 2016 at 12:12, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy < sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com> wrote: > Have you tried to run the unit tests? (Run 'app/test' application, then > 'malloc_autotest') > > Sergio > > > On 10/05/2016 16:55, Mahdi Moradmand Badie wrote: > > #!/bin/sh > ./build/app/Mahdi_test -c 0x55 --master-lcore 0 > > On 10 May 2016 at 11:31, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy < > sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com> wrote: > >> Forgot to ask, >> >> What's the command line you are using to run the app? >> >> Sergio >> >> >> On 10/05/2016 16:17, Mahdi Moradmand Badie wrote: >> >> Thanks Sergio, >> Yes sure, >> I attached files, it seems so easy but doesn't work. >> Thanks, >> >> On 10 May 2016 at 04:12, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy < >> sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 09/05/2016 18:32, Mahdi Moradmand Badie wrote: >>> >>>> Hello All, >>>> >>>> I had a problem regarding use the rte_malloc. >>>> I want to know if I want to use rte_malloc instead of malloc just mak >>>> change like this >>>> struct lcore_params *p = malloc >>>> < >>>> http://dpdk.org/doc/api/rte__malloc_8h.html#afb7316a4ec228ed9b8ffc1864b03d85b >>>> > >>>> (sizeof(*p)); ==> >>>> struct lcore_params *p = rte_malloc >>>> < >>>> http://dpdk.org/doc/api/rte__malloc_8h.html#afb7316a4ec228ed9b8ffc1864b03d85b >>>> >(NULL, >>>> sizeof(*p), 0); >>>> is enough ? >>>> >>> >>> Yes, malloc(sizeof(*p)) has an equivalent behavior to rte_malloc(NULL, >>> sizeof(*p), 0) >>> in the context of a DPDK application. >>> >>> Because I have problem and Segmentation fault (core dumped) ?? >>>> >>> >>> Could you provide more details of how to reproduce or could you try to >>> reproduce your problem using a very simple example like >>> examples/helloworld ? >>> >>> Sergio >>> >>> Thanks in advance, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> M@hdi Mor@dm@nd B@die >> >> >> > > > -- > M@hdi Mor@dm@nd B@die > > > -- M@hdi Mor@dm@nd B@die