From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qg0-f47.google.com (mail-qg0-f47.google.com [209.85.192.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50ABB2C66; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 06:15:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-qg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id t4so3944452qge.0; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 21:15:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eAtTsuwXWfbqoQnRIgHqne9uxwrNozQzE2Va0ofJJBM=; b=lvW2uXdJnvZ0vevVSKr1vP/h8Akukz7c678nmHW+Jmj1g//Ss9mRakemeTiOjy8JeL /RfSkv5PBGcopHAUE6Y12QYSmwkOr8NmZBfrY3iEun4u7tYhnuPGlHvaIbMWuspT6qk9 ZVtyWzSpHB3AjmOt3Ux61Vd5NKUqHk9ObUC8hsrp8Dw/awxqtqZvssbdrYtDau5n/8Wl fAWDfcF71XkdyPJ1BnWuR+XGgC6oQDFr9mu5wG+L+U5iPsPSnsk1hrXZ10WlAdKZ21x4 fliNk3e2kxUOZ7ygIy3lTAJqASAzvY/4xcPEue/BGooHsY9qwMVwUweogAEHSiRKjlX8 kv2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eAtTsuwXWfbqoQnRIgHqne9uxwrNozQzE2Va0ofJJBM=; b=OODBJdnFMQzqiYCtia5C7izHxE7UrDe6umP4bYD0WoHoK1mEBK0NQLfNDc+QBm8eox r2mVnLRbofc0kR7REGRuK7pqXHLBpsqV5ltnsKcuVlEtm6wD6bJ7KSMvFCsaIFf3eMan CxetfGrKB66p/jSC/Y7061p2syzdzEY5IpzN99rptO33OASm5/lGl1O07VL9NTk7BgU2 bJu2DFaeSNl2/nj4o5xPPfBE7rNdxkP3tlMSnhQToaSRjSKZoIWAvpkAJykMq8XX2aek WguhD1XBzQzSgYX59zgSNZXVvjwCj3B1BqiPNi5Hk3ns3DK5A7Js/ldrgYRGf6grMFz7 RtYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJK28y6YizbKRgXAgkH+Ck4uO4aSlqJafCScMhRupiNttlZRq0V5BHgI707wQdUOcdArEc+3yQLZLMP9Pw== X-Received: by 10.140.104.19 with SMTP id z19mr9144272qge.68.1457414154826; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 21:15:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.94.215 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 21:15:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Mahdi Moradmand Badie Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 00:15:15 -0500 Message-ID: To: Hamed Zaghaghi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: dev@dpdk.org, users@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] how to Read(Write) from(to) via lcores in dpdk regardless of NIC X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 05:15:55 -0000 Dear Hamed, First of all thank you so much for your kindly reply, It's the primary part of the big project, in order to be more familiar with DPDK, I have to implement the mentioned framework by use of DPDK, And finally we wanna implement the cache locking approach (via help of features like Cache Allocation Technology(CAT), Cache Monitoring Technology (CMT)) in Xeon processor (my supervisor told me this simple exercise will be helpful to do the final part) in such a way we could dedicate a specific part of shared memory (L3) to each core which the other don't access to it. Obviously using of DPDK with Xeon which both are from "Intel", is considered as strength point. I hope this was more clear :) On 7 March 2016 at 23:56, Hamed Zaghaghi wrote: > Hi Mahdi, > > Why do you want to use DPDK when you don't use NIC? You can do what you > want outside of DPDK. > > Regards, > Hamed Zaghaghi > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:16 AM Mahdi Moradmand Badie < > mahdi.mbadie@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear All, >> I am Mahdi and I am new in DPDK, >> I wanna generate for example 3 different packets in core0 as master write >> it to share memory (L3), then core1 as slave read this packets, change >> them >> with for example function1 and write again in share memory (L3) and >> finally >> check the result with whatever I expect. >> The most important thing is that I don't wanna use NIC and I don't know >> for >> working with cores how I can write/read to/from them, I mean with which >> template and sequence??? >> Thanks in advance, >> > -- M@hdi Mor@dm@nd B@die