Hi
 Any idea on the ETA for this patch? I'm presuming it's all good to be pulled into the mainline otherwise?

Thanks
Som


On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 20:05:15 +0200
Damien Millescamps <damien.millescamps@6wind.com> wrote:

> On 06/05/2013 05:49 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:50:03 +0200
> > Damien Millescamps <damien.millescamps@6wind.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Stephen,
> >>
> >> Overall this patch is very nice. My only comment on this one is why do
> >> you limit the max number of memory resources to 5 ?
> >> The PCI configuration space permits to store up to 6 base addresses.
> >>
> >>> +#define PCI_MEM_RESOURCE 5
> >> Please, can you add a log/comment with your patch, too ?
> >>
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> > Only because I was trying to save some space, and I didn't see any hardware
> > with that many useful regions. Also the kernel UIO driver has some control
> > over which regions get exposed.
>
> I agree that hardware generally don't use that much BAR for the PCIe.
> However, this is only a matter of 20 to 24 Bytes, so I don't see any
> reason not defining this macro as per the PCI standard value.
>
> Could you add a commit log and change that so it can be ack'd and pushed
> in the DPDK repository ?
>
> Thanks,

Go ahead and change the 5 to a 7.
No point in another resend of whole pile.