From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bsdasm@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-oi0-f43.google.com (mail-oi0-f43.google.com
 [209.85.218.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754F0B3FA
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 18 May 2016 14:56:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-oi0-f43.google.com with SMTP id k142so74790464oib.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 18 May 2016 05:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=dpam1h4X8cYRO4w9l44yVzTC4C9xl41psIL9kk88IwA=;
 b=p0YOSsQaCLnCpCCNIxSAjaNiE0UA2CoeQsxnO/oerIQvJzxFkeu3QvaB0nI1tyn42a
 wW0ta8iJv4Q7L0cRL8TqrUFeZJgvy567TT0OoucIIIXdxz1mJrxMsnkscYq6sJ9s5Mov
 hLDcmbUgQfD87Orf4cgL8fkksNpqTLDngprHYMkHCeBTbKsdDX6QfBItrII69UYwLjse
 vIU0HeG5/DrrvK7C23j4XOFywxU9kvzx3iqOVk9VDeeTqLFGMRtP5jq2Q0G4dFviaMYl
 adFYtHKj+Ks9emLmNICiI5cP7YoCrjvsX6Q67VOxGDpSDgljdlvTRMFEMNIh0EwCwWW1
 H4hg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject
 :to; bh=dpam1h4X8cYRO4w9l44yVzTC4C9xl41psIL9kk88IwA=;
 b=HDL3rv+cOD6lclp4pB8LU7BEQ0CmGq/453Rwaq48HqizfO4yhRKiinkKQDuI+xSrr4
 ZmGFmHRrSNQ1WMgFzxvQ9Y8LXzITCKQCq2iZ5v5EgJwcDmTCXMXbWh4tSkcEQhzxRety
 /dW+O4uVGCYMomKhEKJ/ks1Fouhpb6Thg906fuaufqJV5PbBI3w7D2yvYGVewqG9wbKb
 n4aAhAOfwkE9/lUl5JrJ5xg5Vq/lyolgo/pSX+FbhDK84m4tzNk18hcex6AUjaAmdSql
 MgxyXLelcYGTMiVgwneVhf447sQvWahKE3M4ogofU6YI5ziGaIzOYeh3hYaWJe5wNtfR
 5rGg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUHUOKMRoINolnw0jBzXbwyZuo7Sxzc7eCJdwYk7GRdlrz/64qFAEIjCezxK9Zzo1y/M1z11xGt/pvLpw==
X-Received: by 10.157.59.183 with SMTP id k52mr4083280otc.1.1463576174832;
 Wed, 18 May 2016 05:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: bsdasm@gmail.com
Received: by 10.202.91.138 with HTTP; Wed, 18 May 2016 05:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: ASM <asm@asm.pp.ru>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 15:55:55 +0300
X-Google-Sender-Auth: VuXgqfGwYUqRC_BBDRJwQ_q0el4
Message-ID: <CAMmAVbWoT0RLOygxz6xzYh5nFyxu1F7Rb-kRKuP4xvzvMXxMkg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: [dpdk-dev] rte_reorder_free_mbufs function for librte_reorder
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 12:56:15 -0000

Hi folks.

I want to use stand alone rte_ring and rte_reorder library's.
Without mempool.

For rte_ring I can call rte_ring_get_memsize() function, alloc memory
by self and use rte_ring.
But reorder don't have rte_reorder_get_memsize. Struct
rte_reorder_buffer is private.

Furthermore, code have DRY (don't repeat yourself ) problem.
For example:
line 86: const unsigned int min_bufsize = sizeof(*b) +  (2 * size *
sizeof(struct rte_mbuf *));
line 132: const unsigned int bufsize = sizeof(struct
rte_reorder_buffer) +(2 * size * sizeof(struct rte_mbuf *));

Is it possible to add rte_reorder_get_memsize for librte_reorder?

Thanks.

---
Best regards,
Leonid Myravjev