From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723C5A00C2; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:50:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B7F40E0F; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:50:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-yw1-f177.google.com (mail-yw1-f177.google.com [209.85.128.177]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA0840E03 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:50:51 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-yw1-f177.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-3bfd998fa53so45497137b3.5 for ; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:50:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RUpTGk0CzrJlJjXw+265yz0y/MqBhhncsgbWBuSBu9w=; b=Z61G7lAyFVnQIiglBKBq0B3XbEKYFnhsmuGNBobIwL994se5391909Kf3bssRkUMrM yHEot7C+xl8LwStVMCRTGgjQ4ndy8bOdOaImAcdDgMKvGjIR0gqBpGHSfN6BYq99XCPh c+bvsGxM1i+6YVYh8dqrX8DSBGzFMLBd2yjUoZ2bV5wj+V/a0ZyYSdjBb/agZtNMPB0m IrwsNNioTQSesejTlSlPrMXeQXVNXAbjAJVWx/QKakL2jd/MoWr2XPrFzFozXOWB9z8w FoeHXPbq+16vUiLWXcvrrwD3J+hpB3ZTD7QfDwnuEJU3unJEF72p8zr3MHNSsqPZW7Dp VA1w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=RUpTGk0CzrJlJjXw+265yz0y/MqBhhncsgbWBuSBu9w=; b=61DCZhavSYaqglcnMcaZgYqnCFAsghjWP830W96gFrh65AfhtCKNsfsS1CFh+DhkQY B9YHm+mhzHCjYvUGeHR0SumawrOhAPKa3VGntY47yaVUKJK6bBtm/a04ITQbFaJRYV6b +Bl0Hchj6Da7Dqgak6Fv/6Pq1WMj0toBvnYHAsCcSogoK4cpHvJ9DcdI78m5SgQgbDgO ZJnY//ixCecEYtm5EluVty8BzStsZUcEDRHORLGNkxeS4JvUS7n2QjC8T9pugVFgmO5K c0RcwJlV/r9UrfiPI//Ss8qKXLR1idY9FBrvN1QvKRlNfOjRqxgrdLOfaFrtGgNQh+R1 bmbw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmGNqosXvLAQLyFJ7HnXvBOOsTmCUK5uVGkKjCO/0UjCu9y7yIT 93d0Jt4+U+oZbLhenJccuj04djwzonDpDU3d2kI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6X7uPRf/qFCf3pt+ZgH0NU5n/xtoFa4FAHaJy9gTEC3ZJzxbuk0GmgHiaoKtP1/4V14irn3iDbbiE0g8+0G3I= X-Received: by 2002:a81:1a51:0:b0:3f0:6fad:b0d with SMTP id a78-20020a811a51000000b003f06fad0b0dmr14535963ywa.322.1670579449436; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:50:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221128105232.1394896-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Luca Boccassi Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 09:50:38 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 20.11.7 patches review and test To: YangHang Liu Cc: dev , Kevin Traynor , Pei Zhang , Chao Yang Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Thank you! On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 at 09:25, YangHang Liu wrote: > > Hi Luca, > > RedHat QE does not find new issues about the 20.11.7 dpdk during the tests. > > We tested below 17 scenarios and all got PASS on RHEL8: > > Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(1G hugepage size): PASS > Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(2M hugepage size) : PASS > Guest with device assignment(VF) throughput testing: PASS > PVP (host dpdk testpmd as vswitch) 1Q: throughput testing: PASS > PVP vhost-user 2Q throughput testing: PASS > PVP vhost-user 1Q - cross numa node throughput testing: PASS > Guest with vhost-user 2 queues throughput testing: PASS > vhost-user reconnect with dpdk-client, qemu-server: qemu reconnect: PASS > vhost-user reconnect with dpdk-client, qemu-server: ovs reconnect: PASS > PVP 1Q live migration testing: PASS > PVP 1Q cross numa node live migration testing: PASS > Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 1Q live migration testing: PASS > Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 1Q live migration testing (2M): PASS > Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 2Q live migration testing: PASS > Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 4Q live migration testing: PASS > Host PF + DPDK testing: PASS > Host VF + DPDK testing: PASS > > Versions: > > kernel 4.18 > qemu-kvm-6.2 > DPDK > > commit 849770ce78a1b1a4871871feafbfcd9c204ea625 (tag: v20.11.7-rc1) > > Author: Luca Boccassi > > Date: Mon Nov 28 10:21:36 2022 +0000 > version: 20.11.7-rc1 > Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi > > > NICs: X540-AT2 NIC(ixgbe, 10G) > > > Best Regards, > YangHang Liu > > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 6:23 PM Jiang, YuX wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk20.11.7-rc1 validation test rate is 95%. No critical issue is found. >> 2 new bugs are found, 1 new issue is under confirming by Intel Dev. >> New bugs: >> 1, Compilation error compiling dpdk with vm_power_manager sample app -- Intel dev is under investigating. >> 2, vf_interrupt_pmd/nic_interrupt_VF_vfio_pci: l3fwd-power Wake up failed on X722 37d0 >> - Find on DPDK22.11, it has fix patch: https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20221117065726.277672-1-kaisenx.you@intel.com/ >> - Patch is not merged into main, its fix can be applied on LTS20.11.7-rc1 and tested passed. >> 3, inline ipsec: test failed on LTS20.11.7 -- Intel validation owner and dev are under investigating. >> >> # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing >> * Build & CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with latest GCC/Clang version and the popular OS revision such as Ubuntu20.04, Fedora36, RHEL8.4, etc. >> - All test done. One known bug: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=991 net/ena build failure with gcc 12, still no fix. >> * PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >> * VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >> * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible Descriptor, etc. >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >> * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including PF/VF single core performance test, etc. >> - All test done. No big performance drop. >> * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic test - QAT&SW/FIB library, etc. >> - One issue is under confirming. >> >> # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing >> * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf testing/VMAWARE ESXI 7.0u3, etc. >> - All test done. No new issue is found. >> * Cryptodev: >> *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc. >> - All test passed. >> *Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput Performance /Cryptodev Latency, etc. >> - All test done. >> >> Best regards, >> Yu Jiang >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: luca.boccassi@gmail.com >> > Sent: Monday, November 28, 2022 6:53 PM >> > To: stable@dpdk.org >> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe ; Ali >> > Alnubani ; Walker, Benjamin >> > ; David Christensen ; >> > Hemant Agrawal ; Stokes, Ian >> > ; Jerin Jacob ; Mcnamara, John >> > ; Ju-Hyoung Lee ; Kevin >> > Traynor ; Luca Boccassi ; Pei >> > Zhang ; Xu, Qian Q ; Raslan >> > Darawsheh ; Thomas Monjalon ; >> > Yanghang Liu ; Peng, Yuan ; >> > Chen, Zhaoyan >> > Subject: 20.11.7 patches review and test >> > >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 20.11.7. >> > >> > The planned date for the final release is the 12th of December. >> > >> > Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report any >> > issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release the fixes and >> > reported validations will be added to the release notes. >> > >> > A release candidate tarball can be found at: >> > >> > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v20.11.7-rc1 >> > >> > These patches are located at branch 20.11 of dpdk-stable repo: >> > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ >> > >> > Thanks. >> > >> > Luca Boccassi >> > >> > ---