From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FD243DCA;
	Mon,  8 Apr 2024 11:25:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45FD140289;
	Mon,  8 Apr 2024 11:25:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-yw1-f172.google.com (mail-yw1-f172.google.com
 [209.85.128.172])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5B440041;
 Mon,  8 Apr 2024 11:25:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-yw1-f172.google.com with SMTP id
 00721157ae682-617dfcf80aeso23982087b3.3; 
 Mon, 08 Apr 2024 02:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712568309; x=1713173109;
 h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
 :reply-to;
 bh=tYxAodhEC7nmkXYDXjPd4ZgTzLHCnfsmYXrwI6s3XeQ=;
 b=LgUwd+sFCoJtPVuwAIM5OSRhgd3hFuU8o1ZqvooQXHK9rsIaKEI4efDSt4El+93N3A
 KAVw2QyZZ9LaAtTwP2Kq8U5VgiHMkC16MZTtOHVfGpFibT/W8rRplkxts9NaXjTqXZSj
 lzePvyHcCKE+BdUQL/m2vOmybu0E2EZihJmxZSjpt3Qeqe2bUufZsynwubSdIT3+Javc
 hST72zz9jYc2LWas0IA1iPvbrBTtUpHiSWUa4NwzjGQdra1HlpIC3JpAg1icDXsq1m3v
 8fP9OSxsQChfnK/x2vIW7rGCtIccw4CkfYUYjSZHVHxOlQeqs9Io2b3/bdln006eqxxM
 e4qw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1;
 AJvYcCWCE7gR0kA1gWu+SOEmpXl0iOBExzqgn9FU9FLn7pqAOiO5MkLKXzoNcMUkZxUBfv01snqXpuY+xerLZFU=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YydLgc0TvGXq5+wG6blZGs5zU9NLGF+16HuBaPmrTPkFRbQkc8a
 d4LjWLt3gksbGjHTWPXNgnm3aTY4TdEJxoddtFcvETqOqjqinxU2GVL3+S/E4ag=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHslB/SGn0Ccx7WJGDHcyihgGN6fmu5wBxRsOFm3KNDknPatyYHgB4Vc4hO+3OzTfxfslNDmA==
X-Received: by 2002:a81:9c0c:0:b0:615:2135:f479 with SMTP id
 m12-20020a819c0c000000b006152135f479mr6988348ywa.13.1712568308907; 
 Mon, 08 Apr 2024 02:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw1-f174.google.com (mail-yw1-f174.google.com.
 [209.85.128.174]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 ih4-20020a05690c6a0400b00609efea8f69sm1585046ywb.105.2024.04.08.02.25.08
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Mon, 08 Apr 2024 02:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw1-f174.google.com with SMTP id
 00721157ae682-6150670d372so37932267b3.1; 
 Mon, 08 Apr 2024 02:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1;
 AJvYcCVnzhZbWdHjscS9U7r6Kdx4UEOufmbnHWF+qp77grPI/ecg5a+ce8pvtt1Q90CejdEQDIx50K8xEVsu00Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a0d:ca0e:0:b0:615:8029:49f8 with SMTP id
 m14-20020a0dca0e000000b00615802949f8mr2262020ywd.23.1712568308423; Mon, 08
 Apr 2024 02:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240403231101.979032-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com>
 <CAGYh1E8UbFLdFihd4UebzCjMrf2u7KNdqVQCAmnbt4gbvQVJ7Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGYh1E8UbFLdFihd4UebzCjMrf2u7KNdqVQCAmnbt4gbvQVJ7Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 10:24:57 +0100
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAMw=ZnTe64DM78tD=_EGKFOqu5CKqhrJiG9xCcu5jB2n2jHRNg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAMw=ZnTe64DM78tD=_EGKFOqu5CKqhrJiG9xCcu5jB2n2jHRNg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 22.11.5 patches review and test
To: YangHang Liu <yanghliu@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@dpdk.org, dev@dpdk.org, Pei Zhang <pezhang@redhat.com>, 
 Chao Yang <chayang@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org

On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 05:09, YangHang Liu <yanghliu@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> RedHat QE tested below 18 scenarios on RHEL9.4 and didn't find any new dpdk issues.
>
> Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(1G hugepage size): PASS
> Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(2M hugepage size) : PASS
> Guest with device assignment(VF) throughput testing: PASS
> PVP (host dpdk testpmd as vswitch) 1Q: throughput testing: PASS
> PVP vhost-user 2Q throughput testing: PASS
> PVP vhost-user 1Q - cross numa node throughput testing: PASS
> Guest with vhost-user 2 queues throughput testing: PASS
> vhost-user reconnect with dpdk-client, qemu-server qemu reconnect: PASS
> vhost-user reconnect with dpdk-client, qemu-server ovs reconnect: PASS
> PVP  reconnect with dpdk-client, qemu-server: PASS
> PVP 1Q live migration testing: PASS
> PVP 1Q cross numa node live migration testing: PASS
> Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 1Q live migration testing: PASS
> Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 1Q live migration testing (2M): PASS
> Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 2Q live migration testing: PASS
> Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 4Q live migration testing: PASS
> Host PF + DPDK testing: PASS
> Host VF + DPDK testing: PASS
>
> Test Versions:
>
> qemu-kvm-8.2.0
> kernel 5.14
> libvirt 10.0
> git log
>
> Test device : X540-AT2 NIC(ixgbe, 10G)
>
> Tested-by: Yanghang Liu<yanghliu@redhat.com>

Thank you!