From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com (mail-lb0-f175.google.com [209.85.217.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E2C8D9D for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:35:22 +0100 (CET) Received: by lbcao8 with SMTP id ao8so59828720lbc.3 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 03:35:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=AxjN0+bt+Xw7JOdpmV2ws/CuTE78L8pqZYK/t4F+9Rw=; b=cII4uAoC4BSzTDDmIWg3XPmZYCc0I+Pt9Maay3/Q4LwWnH0eE+mogIj5xiaJrXhBgV iKY4qOLTh/3abAzOfXFTVdnHxk+LEymcEVaUuSOycnmLyAKrsOy/usEsV+H0ayMtAgCr YPf0cDY0vDrUBCHCuJfu6gvE5m//xuV7+uOpX0vTCVsU7sPXKD+KXR6NIojujcoeELm3 bcKXfe4pZBhQ+ceT5iyE4+yEBua+CtWJ7FldjFwc3X5nIf3g5OKBEbOJEy8nTmOtxpa9 3k7HFh9iYz34F7hcfz6qoNuev6RvuS2a1iela+RZrkTC2vtH5+0giJ46bYYPeZ2RVHAR ODgg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.209.4 with SMTP id mi4mr19860599lbc.7.1445942121977; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 03:35:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.199.4 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 03:35:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20151026184046.GA22533@mhcomputing.net> References: <1445608311-8092-1-git-send-email-michalx.k.jastrzebski@intel.com> <20151023162033.GA10036@mhcomputing.net> <562B209A.6030507@mhcomputing.net> <60ABE07DBB3A454EB7FAD707B4BB1582139CCC19@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com> <20151026184046.GA22533@mhcomputing.net> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 13:35:21 +0300 Message-ID: From: Vladimir Medvedkin To: Matthew Hall Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/3] lpm: increase number of next hops for lpm (ipv4) X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:35:22 -0000 Hi Michal, Try patch below. I will send it via git. Regards, Vladimir 2015-10-26 21:40 GMT+03:00 Matthew Hall : > > I can't apply patch 0001-... , could You check it please? > > I generated it from a rebase of my own copy of DPDK against DPDK upstream > master. > > So I'm not sure why it would not apply against latest DPDK master. > > But I will try it and see what could be the reason. > > Matthew. >