Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_lpm with larger nexthops or another method?

[Vladimir Medvedkin <medvedkinv@gmail.com>]

Hi Matthew,

I published changes to rte_lpm_tbl24_entry only because it was just an idea
:) So rte_lpm_tbl8_entry should look like:
struct rte_lpm_tbl8_entry {
        uint32_t next_hop :24; /**< next hop. */
        uint32_t valid       :1; /**< Validation flag. */
        uint32_t valid_group :1; /**< Group validation flag. */
        uint32_t depth       :6; /**< Rule depth. */
};

,and
struct rte_lpm_rule {
        uint32_t ip; /**< Rule IP address. */
        uint32_t  next_hop; /**< Rule next hop. */
};
, and different defines and checks should be modified too.


2015-06-24 8:15 GMT+03:00 Matthew Hall <mhall@mhcomputing.net>:

> OK, I went and made a whole ton of patches to LPM and the tests and
> examples,
> now the selftest errors out... but I think maybe I don't have an adequate
> amount of hugepages. How much hugepage memory did people have when they
> did the selftest successfully before?
>
> I just keep seeing this over and over...
>
> RTE>>lpm_autotest
> Error at line 293:
> ERROR: LPM Test tests[i]: FAIL
> LPM: LPM memory allocation failed
>
> Matthew.
>