* [dpdk-dev] L2FWD uses 'too much' CPU
@ 2014-04-01 5:24 Fred Pedrisa
2014-04-01 16:36 ` Vladimir Medvedkin
[not found] ` <067001cf4dc8$b18539d0$148fad70$@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Fred Pedrisa @ 2014-04-01 5:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
Hi,
Why by default L2FWD saturate both cores ? I mean, it seems it keeps wasting
cycles due to the infinite loop placed there to check the queues.
Which would be the way to improve this and make it to become more efficient
?
Sincerely,
Fred
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [dpdk-dev] L2FWD uses 'too much' CPU
2014-04-01 5:24 [dpdk-dev] L2FWD uses 'too much' CPU Fred Pedrisa
@ 2014-04-01 16:36 ` Vladimir Medvedkin
[not found] ` <067001cf4dc8$b18539d0$148fad70$@gmail.com>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Medvedkin @ 2014-04-01 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fred Pedrisa; +Cc: dev
Hi,
One of the objectives of DPDK is avoiding of interrupts, so application
(not only L2FWD) polls NIC infineteley. You can look at programmers guide
section 24 "Power Management" and "L3 Forwarding with Power Management
Sample Application" in Sample Applications User Guide.
Regards,
Vladimir.
2014-04-01 9:24 GMT+04:00 Fred Pedrisa <fredhps10@hotmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Why by default L2FWD saturate both cores ? I mean, it seems it keeps
> wasting
> cycles due to the infinite loop placed there to check the queues.
>
>
>
> Which would be the way to improve this and make it to become more efficient
> ?
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> Fred
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread[parent not found: <067001cf4dc8$b18539d0$148fad70$@gmail.com>]
* [dpdk-dev] RES: L2FWD uses 'too much' CPU
[not found] ` <067001cf4dc8$b18539d0$148fad70$@gmail.com>
@ 2014-04-01 16:43 ` Fred Pedrisa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Fred Pedrisa @ 2014-04-01 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Vladimir Medvedkin'; +Cc: dev
Hello,
Ok. Can you help me with something else ?
Right now, at a rate of 1.3~1.4 Mpps I am having about 4~5% of packet loss,
I wonder if I use my application wth a 10G NIC, will it not be able to cope
with more than 1.4 Mpps ? Because by seeing a packet loss I got a little
afraid of it.
Sincerely,
Fred
De: Vladimir Medvedkin [mailto:medvedkinv@gmail.com]
Enviada em: terça-feira, 1 de abril de 2014 13:36
Para: Fred Pedrisa
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Assunto: Re: [dpdk-dev] L2FWD uses 'too much' CPU
Hi,
One of the objectives of DPDK is avoiding of interrupts, so application (not
only L2FWD) polls NIC infineteley. You can look at programmers guide
section 24 "Power Management" and "L3 Forwarding with Power Management
Sample Application" in Sample Applications User Guide.
Regards,
Vladimir.
2014-04-01 9:24 GMT+04:00 Fred Pedrisa <fredhps10@hotmail.com>:
Hi,
Why by default L2FWD saturate both cores ? I mean, it seems it keeps wasting
cycles due to the infinite loop placed there to check the queues.
Which would be the way to improve this and make it to become more efficient
?
Sincerely,
Fred
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-04-01 16:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-04-01 5:24 [dpdk-dev] L2FWD uses 'too much' CPU Fred Pedrisa
2014-04-01 16:36 ` Vladimir Medvedkin
[not found] ` <067001cf4dc8$b18539d0$148fad70$@gmail.com>
2014-04-01 16:43 ` [dpdk-dev] RES: " Fred Pedrisa
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).