From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-la0-f52.google.com (mail-la0-f52.google.com [209.85.215.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B75F593E for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 12:55:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id b17so5745515lan.11 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 03:58:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=MOEtcMIObuu4iac7lSaFo2iHpKffAo9YvZ8LyICQfk4=; b=PduDd1edTU7M6fghbgle6ilj8vM8ZtuWsN24YoiAXQyPYeSUCzF2HhOVYOBgHPiN52 KK28mQu+ibH+I0hyfaWnagrf0yIiVZaTVD18nWaVaYj+uzw4hHrNzLSh+9JuRlo5at2l xewwj39D85APx/A64zIpbiq4z8f+R9R0ALpkfup9cwSj+Q3xUO7oxNrLqGACTevgHwPj CYBIhhNsYBavWbkRyBH7rdf50tma6/Tp8H/QkLPkVV5YD70e/OoE6QXt/iMSHMkDJUBu epJxqY0tcJ8db2aop1LYFu5PWADNaE6IlcdSbUic+gp4dppRlVoBUoa2Cy5oHsSP1+cc 4HmA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.8.99 with SMTP id q3mr34049363lba.85.1408445906078; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 03:58:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.197.102 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 03:58:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <67bb9b241243465497c8aae410bc25ee@AMSPR06MB086.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> References: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8AD8DA4@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <735e767ffc77477ab517319407651172@AMSPR06MB086.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8AD91C6@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <7241f60d228f4a4dae39ed26f316d81c@AMSPR06MB086.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8AD9AAA@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <67bb9b241243465497c8aae410bc25ee@AMSPR06MB086.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:58:26 +0400 Message-ID: From: Vladimir Medvedkin To: Ilan Borenshtein Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:55:00 -0000 Hi all, According to 82599 datasheet it is possible to route packets to different queues within VF. So in not VT mode rx_queue defines absolute queue number, and in VT rx_queue defines relative queue number within VF. I can make patch later when I will have free time. Regards, Vladimir 2014-08-19 12:08 GMT+04:00 Ilan Borenshtein : > Yes, 82599. > I'll be updated. > > Thank you for your answer. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu@intel.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 10:41 AM > To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function > > > Are you talking about 82599? > > I have no plan to support this currently. But I don't know there may be > volunteers who is planning for it. I guess it also be great if you are > eager to contribute to it. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ilan Borenshtein [mailto:ilan@asocstech.com] > > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 3:17 PM > > To: Wu, Jingjing; dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function > > > > Looking for director packet to different queues in a VF. > > Will it be implemented in future releases ? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu@intel.com] > > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 3:40 AM > > To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function > > > > Could you explain what exactly you want? Director packet to a VF? Or > > director packet to different queue in a VF? > > > > For the first one, I think if you know which queue the VF is using, > > the flow director can do it (it's my understanding, haven't try). > > But for the latter, I have no idea which way can be used instead. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Ilan Borenshtein [mailto:ilan@asocstech.com] > > > Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 3:34 PM > > > To: Wu, Jingjing; dev@dpdk.org > > > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Is there any other way except of the Flow director to use the > different Rx queues by a VF ? > > > Will the next versions support flow director for VF ? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Ilan B > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu@intel.com] > > > Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 10:51 AM > > > To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev@dpdk.org > > > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > Flow director is not supported on VF now. > > > I think this may be the reason why ENOTSUP is returned. > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ilan > > > > Borenshtein > > > > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 8:34 PM > > > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I'm trying to configure the flow director of VF 82599 port using > > > > rte_eth_dev_fdir_add_signature_filter (). > > > > The function returns with ENOTSUP. > > > > Doe's flow director supported for VF ? > > > > What can be the reason for ENOTSUP ? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ilan B >