Hi,

Is there any other work/changes required for this patch to be submitted?
Thanks

On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 7:53 PM Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru> wrote:
On 8/8/22 13:39, Joyce Kong wrote:
> Hi Huzaifa,
>
> This patch looks good to me.
> And would you please help review my memif patches?
> https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/cover/20220701102815.1444223-1-joyce.kong@arm.com/
>
> Thanks,
> Joyce
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: huzaifa.rahman <huzaifa.rahman@emumba.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 6:16 PM
>> To: jgrajcia@cisco.com
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; huzaifa.rahman <huzaifa.rahman@emumba.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH] memif: memif driver does not crashes when there's
>> different N of TX and RX queues
> net/memif: fix memif crash with different Tx Rx queues
>
>>
>> Bugzilla ID: 734
>>
>> there's a bug in memif_stats_get() function due to confusion between C2S
>> (client->server) and S2C (server->client) rings, causing a crash if there's a
>> different number of RX and TX queues.
>>
>> this is fixed by selectiing the correct rings for RX and TX i.e for RX, S2C rings
>> are selected and for TX, C2S rings are selected.
>>
> Fixes: 09c7e63a71f9 ("net/memif: introduce memory interface PMD")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
>> Signed-off-by: huzaifa.rahman <huzaifa.rahman@emumba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>

Fixed above on applying.

Applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks.