DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Huzaifa Rahman <huzaifa.rahman@emumba.com>
To: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
Cc: anatoly.burakov@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, stephen@networkplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mem: close rtemap files
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:12:58 +0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANVhzTjbshcM8qvcBNideuZi6Y-p16hx+oMitT=sE3r0PDUT7Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221006134222.35ed51e1@sovereign>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1939 bytes --]

yes, It reduces the opened files from 450 to 2.
Is there any down side of using --single-file-segments flag. Because if
this is better why not make it the default behaviour.

On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 3:42 PM Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
wrote:

> 2022-10-06 10:04 (UTC+0000), huzaifa.rahman:
> > Bugzilla ID: 560
> >
> > The memory subsystem is leaving open a file descriptor for each
> > rtemap file. This can lead to hundreds of extra open file descriptors
> > which has negative side effects. For example, the application may go
> > over its maximum file descriptor limit, or the application may be using
> > limited API's like select that only allow 1024 file descriptors.
> >
> > The EAL memory subsystem does not need to hold the file open.
> > Probably the original intention was to keep the file locked, but that is
> > not necessary. The Linux kernel keeps a reference count on the file,
> > and the mmap counts is a reference and therefore maintains the file
> > as locked.
> >
> > The fix is just to close the file after it is setup.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: huzaifa.rahman <huzaifa.rahman@emumba.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/eal/linux/eal_memalloc.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/eal/linux/eal_memalloc.c b/lib/eal/linux/eal_memalloc.c
> > index f8b1588cae..955c4e4f95 100644
> > --- a/lib/eal/linux/eal_memalloc.c
> > +++ b/lib/eal/linux/eal_memalloc.c
> > @@ -679,6 +679,9 @@ alloc_seg(struct rte_memseg *ms, void *addr, int
> socket_id,
> >
> >       huge_recover_sigbus();
> >
> > +     close(fd);
> > +     fd_list[list_idx].fds[seg_idx] = -1;
> > +
> >       ms->addr = addr;
> >       ms->hugepage_sz = alloc_sz;
> >       ms->len = alloc_sz;
>
> This breaks rte_memseg_get_fd().
> If memfd_create() was used to open the file descriptor,
> there seems no way to reopen it once closed.
>
> --single-file-segments may be used to save FD count,
> does using it solve your issue?
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2582 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-20 10:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-06 10:04 huzaifa.rahman
2022-10-06 10:42 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-10-20 10:12   ` Huzaifa Rahman [this message]
2022-10-20 10:46     ` Dmitry Kozlyuk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CANVhzTjbshcM8qvcBNideuZi6Y-p16hx+oMitT=sE3r0PDUT7Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=huzaifa.rahman@emumba.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).